General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs President Biden going too far with his executive orders?
I mean, c'mon, Joe ... Maybe you need to slow your roll for a few days.
On edit: It amazes me that this is even necessary, but:
SlogginThroughIt
(1,977 posts)They didn't want to heed our warnings then that if W made this the norm that this would happen.
True Dough
(17,383 posts)BY EXECUTIVE ORDER!!!
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)That could be next.
Cetacea
(7,367 posts)Heads are exploding..
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Dude is ON FIRE!
lame54
(35,345 posts)Justice
(7,188 posts)Trump had 200+ EO.
msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)everything that monster rolled back has to be put back in place, and more. He's doing it right.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,073 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,288 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(16,897 posts)Keep hammering Joe. Kick ass.
Make those MAGAts in Congress go on the record that they are Anti-American.
johnp3907
(3,736 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I can't believe it was even necessary.
allnews
(244 posts)Keep them coming!!!
former9thward
(32,146 posts)Obama had quite a few of his knocked down by the SC in 9-0 decisions.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Bucky
(54,094 posts)former9thward
(32,146 posts)Yes, hilarious. The point I was making stands because Biden has signed more EOs that any of the last few presidents in this short time.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Or are knock-knock jokes merely potential points of contention as well?
ProfessorGAC
(65,400 posts)Roisin Ni Fiachra
(2,574 posts)Prez gets stuff done, as fast as possible, which is exactly what we need.
Bucky
(54,094 posts)He'd been pressed by Civil Rights leaders to lean on Executive Orders to fix the country's civil rights abuses (and he did do that some; it was really Kennedy who used EOs for civil rights action). But Johnson also felt like it would be more transformative to have Congress, the people's representatives, pass the major pieces of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965. And he was right. For all his faults, Johnson ended up having a much bigger impact on how much progress was made than Kennedy did.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's not to say that you're wrong about who had the bigger impact, but Kennedy's role in that legislation is usually forgotten:
The Report to the American People on Civil Rights was a speech on civil rights, delivered on radio and television by United States President John F. Kennedy from the Oval Office on June 11, 1963 in which he proposed legislation that would later become the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkcivilrights.htm
Chakaconcarne
(2,482 posts)If it wasn't made by OP, then it came from a freeper site and shouldn't be on DU.
That is my opinion.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)niyad
(113,930 posts)nolabear
(42,004 posts)Hey, youve got your peeves, Ive got mine. (I know its a paste)
betsuni
(25,801 posts)Even though I know nothing can be done and everybody says less people, less popcorn, it still bugs the hell out of me.
Same as "troops" used for individuals. Was watching an old movie where a guy was asked how many troops there were and he said there was one, when asked how many troopers, said 95. SEE! I yelled at the TV.
Midnight Writer
(21,853 posts)Bettie
(16,148 posts)the five second rule means nothing when dogs are there! He will still lose the popcorn!
roamer65
(36,748 posts)Keep signing, Joe.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)Just kidding!
He's making FDR look like a slacker.
And they said this trial would slow down his agenda...
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)Burn tRump"s follies to the ground!
For the music lovers out there...
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,552 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)If only DU had a bigger "sarcasm" thingy ...