Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

vsrazdem

(2,174 posts)
Thu Feb 11, 2021, 07:03 PM Feb 2021

I hope the president puts a stop to this.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) under President Joe Biden is going to the mat for former secretary of education Betsy DeVos.

In a Monday filing with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian Boynton and other DOJ attorneys argued that students who were ripped off by for-profit scam colleges cannot depose the former Trump-era official.

“The [students’] demand for a former cabinet official’s deposition is extraordinary, unnecessary, and unsupported,” the filing alleges. “It is a transparent attempt at harassment—part of a PR campaign that has been central to [the students’] litigation strategy from the outset. It should be rejected and the court should quash the subpoena.”

Making common cause with the DOJ in the motion to quash is another Trump-era official: former acting associate attorney general Jesse Panuccio. Now an attorney with elite law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Panuccio is acting as DeVos’s personal attorney “and is represented in her capacity as former U.S. Secretary of Education by the U.S. Department of Justice,” the filing explains in a footnote.

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/biden-admin-teams-up-with-ex-trump-doj-official-to-defend-betsy-devos-against-ripped-off-college-students/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sfstaxprep

(9,998 posts)
1. Joe Biden Said He Would Be 100% Hands Off So Far As DOJ Matters Are Concerned
Thu Feb 11, 2021, 07:04 PM
Feb 2021

Don't expect this to be different.

vsrazdem

(2,174 posts)
3. yes, for investigations. This is the DOJ representing Devoss, when they do not have to.
Thu Feb 11, 2021, 07:08 PM
Feb 2021

Going against students who were ripped off is going to anger a lot of people. This is unjust and it should be stopped immediately.


As a matter of law, the Biden administration does not have to take on DeVos’s representation here. The DOJ picks and chooses whether to represent present and former officials—but they are not bound by any rules, regulations or federal statues to do so. Additionally, there does not appear to be any extant legal authority for the DOJ to represent DeVos here in her personal capacity because she’s not actually a party to the underlying litigation. In order for DOJ to represent DeVos like this, the agency is supposed to initially file a statement of interest but no such document has been filed in the case.

The underlying case concerns hundreds of students who were defrauded by various for-profit colleges across the country. The students, all federal student loan borrowers who are currently in debt, sued the U.S. Department of Education because DeVos’s agency was accused of serially dragging its feet when asked to process student loan debt cancellation requests.

Multiple courts in the Northern District of California agreed with the students. DeVos herself ultimately admitted that student borrowers had paid for educational programs that were effectively “worthless.”

treestar

(82,383 posts)
2. He can't put a stop to a court ruling
Thu Feb 11, 2021, 07:06 PM
Feb 2021

It was Dotard who disregarded court orders.

The law is what it is - it is not impossible they are wrong, not just because we don't like DeVos.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
5. They are supposed to
Thu Feb 11, 2021, 07:17 PM
Feb 2021

When they are sued in their government capacity, they are defended. These happen all the time. Any government agency can be sued, and the officials in their government capacity. In the end, it is an argument over something the agency did. It would be impossible for each Secretary to have to be deposed for every lawsuit - it's all they would do all day. There are probably thousands of lawsuits against her in her capacity as Sec. of Education, and there will be against Biden's.

vsrazdem

(2,174 posts)
7. If you read the article you would see that they were not "required" to represent
Thu Feb 11, 2021, 08:10 PM
Feb 2021

Devoss in this case. She already has a private lawyer representing her. These students are trying to get back the money that the Dept of Education garnished from their accounts after the course already told them to stop, and they disregarded the court's order. There is no reason for the DOJ to be on the side of Devoss. Biden has aready removed the DOJ out of other lawsuits, so there is no reason he cannot do this for these students. This is a no brainer.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
9. The Department of Education is involved.
Fri Feb 12, 2021, 10:16 AM
Feb 2021

I don't know the exact rules, but I don't think you do either. I do not think Biden is supporting or trying to help DeVos in any way.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I hope the president puts...