General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWAPO: Capitol riot defendants facing jail have regrets. Judges aren't buying it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=540https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/capitol-riot-defendants-regrets/2021/02/26/b3d06e3e-76b1-11eb-9537-496158cc5fd9_story.html
By Rachel Weiner and Spencer S. Hsu Feb. 26, 2021 at 12:04 p.m. EST
For many accused of attempting to obstruct the confirmation of electoral college votes in the U.S. presidential election on Jan. 6, arrest was a reality check. Now they are getting another.
As defendants charged in the Capitol siege have been coming through court, some have been shifting blame onto former president Donald Trump, downplaying their actions or expressing remorse. But federal judges particularly those who work a few blocks from the Capitol arent buying it.
One judge called a defendants claim of civil disobedience detached from reality. Another verbally smacked down an attorney who tried to use QAnon the sprawling set of false claims that have coalesced into an extremist ideology to explain his client shouting Kill them all! Other judges have been giving defendants civics lessons on how democracy works.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, the chief federal jurist for the District of Columbia, responded incredulously to one defense attorney who said his client believed Trump requested his unlawful conduct. She said if a president could authorize overturning an election he would be no different from a king or a dictator, and that is not how we operate here.
Tommy Carcetti
(43,182 posts)orangecrush
(19,572 posts)I'll say.
tblue37
(65,408 posts)MontanaMama
(23,322 posts)They need to pay for the damage they did. The current costs exceed 30 million. If we divide that evenly among the people whose names we have on record maybe they will turn in the people we have yet to identify in an effort to get their bills reduced. This is infuriating.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)to pay for metal working and glaziers without costing the taxpayer. The bill is getting too large to not be paid back
Butterflylady
(3,544 posts)Sounds good to me.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)They obviously were all manufactured by the same entity, and they must have cost a bunch of money. I'll bet you'll find either Trump campaign money behind them or money from big donors.
taxi
(1,896 posts)It was said that the rally organizers had $500,000. The rally may or may not have purchased the items, but either way the items would have been meant for the rally and nothing else. That being said, yes, I agree with you.
Grasswire2
(13,571 posts)dianaredwing
(406 posts)Aristus
(66,388 posts)If anyone in a position of authority issues an unlawful order, a soldier is duty-bound to disobey it. And ignorance is not an excuse. The Army teaches (or used to) recruits as to what constitutes a lawful or an unlawful order.
Trump gave an unlawful order. These idiots aren't absolved of responsibility just because they obeyed it.
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Hestia
(3,818 posts)dates
Cha
(297,323 posts)you do the time.
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)Sammy Davis song...
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)play in traffic on the closest interstate, would you do it?
ffr
(22,670 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)I wonder how long it will be before reality slips away again.
TNNurse
(6,927 posts)His friend could not rent that big truck because he did not have a credit card.
So our defendant signed the paperwork and rented the truck.
His friend left it on the side of the road with much damage. It was a big truck so it was a felony.
Our defendant thought he was innocent because he did not damage the truck.
Everyone on the jury understood that if you sign the paperwork you are responsible for the vehicle.
This people do not understand that they showed up and did the damage because he told them to makes them guilty of stupidity.
Felony stupidity.
niyad
(113,350 posts)Aussie105
(5,403 posts)Sure!
Regret they got caught, regret they can't avoid penalties, regret that their Revolution didn't happen.
No pity. No quarter. That law book coming down is going to hit them hard.
This is not about revenge.
It's about applying the law of the country fairly, and above all, making sure they get the message and don't regroup to try again. Because they would.
DemUnleashed
(633 posts)Who cares if they regret it...so what?! A bank robber who gets caught regrets what he did too because he sees his future prison life!!
joe_stampingbull
(165 posts)that evil stupid conman made us do it!!!!
LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)With all judges.
Because if its a "normal" judge, who is non partisan in his rulings, he/she will spare no quarter with these miscreants.
And if its a born again Trump humping judge? Good luck blaming your predicament on that judge's sworn Dear Leader, who can do no wrong.
Evolve Dammit
(16,743 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)mackdaddy
(1,527 posts)That will be real regrets.
But Trumpie says he loves you, so that should make it all better.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)He lost by 7 million votes. Some of these people are actually going to be sentenced to several YEARS in a federal penitentiary. It's truly incredible that they let their lives be thrown away for such piddling nonsense.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Of course they start to backtrack in the cold light of day and consequences. Everybody does.
There are plenty of people serving hefty prison terms because of actions done while in the throes of some irrational influence. That's life. That's why we teach our kids instincts toward civility and decency. That's the training. These people need to accept the consequences of their actions. Let's be clear: they have all snarled angry invective at the stories of crimes *other* people have committed. Why they get this "The lesson I learned" treatment even before trial is obvious.
These people were wilding.
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)MyMission
(1,850 posts)That talked about numbers. Sorry I don't recall where it was, but I'm commenting on my impressions. It mentioned the hundreds who actually entered the building, as opposed to double that who "only" stayed outside on capitol property, which is also a crime. And then the hoards who did neither but were there pushing and cheering the others on and calling for death and destruction of our elected officials and Democratic process.
The ones being arrested and sought are those who entered the building and also those who were within the capitol perimeter. Any who entered the building or grounds did so unlawfully, after violent actions to break through the police lines and the capitol building. Many of them committed violence, others ignored it.
There were many there who did neither. I might suggest that they had some restraint or common sense or awareness or were clearly there to protest and not physically actively interfere. The ones that went in because they were invited or allowed or following the crowd are guilty, and there is video evidence.
What were they thinking when they just walked into the building, as some have claimed? Maybe they weren't thinking. Or they were following the crowd or imagined orders from their leader? Doesn't matter. For many who "breached" there's social media evidence of prior posts that advocated violence disguised as patriotism. Many of them hoped to enact pressure, revenge and violence and are now lying about their motives, claiming regret. Maybe some are honestly regretful. Ultimately they planned, hoped, or allowed themselves to get wild, get caught up in the frenzy and that makes them dangerous, whether their actions were deliberate or not.
There were more who did not enter the building or grounds. Simply put and giving them the benefit of the doubt, they knew better than to trespass. That was a point made in what I read. The ones being arrested should have known better than to engage in criminal behavior.