General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsManchin and Sinema are not centrist.
I'm seeing a lot of dissing on centrist and people spiking the football of sorts by saying, "aha see! Centrist are doing XYZ...
Hillary who nearly 30 years ago worked her butt off for universal healthcare, used her platform to help get CHIP passed is a centrist. Btw, she also had a plan for basic income and said she thought it should look something like what Alaska has in her 2016 platform.
Joe Biden is a centrist, Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, and so on...
Manchin is to the right of centrist and not quite yet a republican. That is not where most centrist are at.
mucifer
(23,596 posts)yellowdogintexas
(22,282 posts)as he was far more liberal than it appeared.
Nixie
(17,003 posts)just like another non-Democrat did, but it was fine for the other guy.
TwilightZone
(25,508 posts)Manchin:
Sinema:
Sources:
https://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Joe_Manchin_III.htm
https://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Kyrsten_Sinema.htm
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,658 posts)I am looking at her behavior, not what she claims.
Bonn1997
(1,675 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)She is not a liberal and will go out of her way to shove it in your face.
Yes she will finally vote on the left but you have to go Collins like concerns and idiotic posturing before doing the right thing. She made a big thing about struggling over voting guilty for Trump's impeachment.
She is a pain but if that is what it takes to beat McSally or Kelly Ward then I am all in
Personally i
grantcart
(53,061 posts)She is not a liberal and will go out of her way to shove it in your face.
Yes she will finally vote on the left but you have to go Collins like concerns and idiotic posturing before doing the right thing. She made a big thing about struggling over voting guilty for Trump's impeachment.
She is a pain but if that is what it takes to beat McSally or Kelly Ward then I am all in
Personally I think she has a screw loose.
TheBlackAdder
(28,240 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 8, 2021, 12:18 AM - Edit history (1)
.
Looking at that, it implies that Liberals cannot have strong economic interests either, and its spectrum touches populists, moderates and Libertarians.
It's looks good on paper, but fails so many political science litmus tests, using basic challenges.
Just food for thought (Note who is sitting next to her.). . .
Link to tweet
.
Celerity
(43,662 posts)off on so many pols. That site is literally the worst ideologically rating site for US politics I have ever seen.
The data is also far too often woefully out of date (Sinema, for instance, is FAR to the right now from where she started out)
Sinema almost halfway to farthest left corner INSIDE the farthest left sector is a joke, even using the incredibly, artificially, skewed to the right US general scale (By general scale I mean NOT just this site, I mean overall perceptions atm after years of rightward sliding of the centre. Even more skewed when compared to most all of the advanced Western nations)
lapucelle
(18,376 posts)Hillary Clinton is a Hard-Core Liberal.
https://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm
https://bit.ly/3qmWhfZ
betsuni
(25,745 posts)lapucelle
(18,376 posts)BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)According to their perception, Hillary is a centrist. Some even called her a republican lite.
lapucelle
(18,376 posts)Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema as "right of center" should probably do a little research into the actual records of the folks in question.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Looking at those charts, it makes it clear to me how someone can be so FAR to the left that even the "CENTER" of the chart looks like the extreme-RW. And the opposite is true also: someone on the FAR right would see someone like Manchin as being a "crazy liberal". --- Isn't it strange how it is that being on the EITHER extreme side can have such a warping effect how ordinary people in the middle are perceived and judged.
That's just crazy-talk. All I'm trying to say is that I think we all have an obligation to bring back to reality anyone who thinks in such a way, or anyone who advocates such a thing.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)bigtree
(86,013 posts)...by those who fling the label around.
'Moderate', and centrist,' on the other hand, are labels the pols themselves apply to legislation and their politics.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It's all relative. What euphemism would you prefer?
bigtree
(86,013 posts)...which, the last time I checked, was 'progressive' or liberal.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... intentionally ambiguous definitions and hypersensitivity over perfectly valid and legitimate words can often lead to confusion in perfectly ordinary conversations that involve discussing the differences of what motivates people to do and say and behave in certain ways. That's all I'm trying to say.
bigtree
(86,013 posts)...calling it "illustrative clarity and precision with regard to making contrasts and comparisons" is just a weak excuse.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)bigtree
(86,013 posts)...that works in your own sphere of influence, but it just grates and divides everywhere else.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Demsrule86
(68,753 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)How about using the term "mainstream" inasmuch as the majority of ALL Democrats wind up being "moderate" or "centrist".
By the way, some on the "far left" call themselves "far left".
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)betsuni
(25,745 posts)Hear that one a lot. Give me a few moments and I will remember who said it.
That one, too.
betsuni
(25,745 posts)Sympthsical
(9,165 posts)She runs as progressive. Biden ran as a moderate. Others run as a centrist.
Far left is anyone to the left of conservative Democrats who hate progressives and need to let everyone know about it.
Repeatedly.
George II
(67,782 posts)BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)Who are you talking about?
ahoysrcsm
(787 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,778 posts)I and others are working to turn Texas blue. Far left policies killed a number of candidates in Texas last cycle including the rather dumb concept of "defund the police." While you may not like this term, I have seen it used by GOP candidates against good Democrats in the real world.
bigtree
(86,013 posts)...it's being used here, and by you, against 'good Democrats.'
The disconnect in your response is stunning.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,778 posts)I am not being ironic in strongly disagreeing with your claims and attempts at analysis. You are wrong and many real democcrats lost in 2020 due to being attacked as socialists and far left. I saw a good number of ads using the ignorant "defund the police" policy to great effect.
The fact that you do not understand the facts here is sad
lapucelle
(18,376 posts)Similarly, it's remarkable that some are labelled "centrist" or "Republican light" based on inaccurate "standard narratives" rather than on actual voting records.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Ridiculous, isn't it?
lapucelle
(18,376 posts)Tom Cotton is a Hard-Core Conservative
Tom Cotton is a Hard-Core Conservative
Irish_Dem
(47,658 posts)They just use the GOP flag for cover.
betsuni
(25,745 posts)or moderate or Republican lite. The rules of why are mysterious! Just because.
Demsrule86
(68,753 posts)majority. Power must be earned at the ballot box.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Being all reasonable, rational, realistic, intelligent and stuff.
I suppose it's true that "everyone wants what they want and they want it RIGHT NOW" ... but some of us live in the real world and we are willing to do the most we can with what we have, and continue to aim high and plan ahead and work hard (and work smart) for where we want to eventually be.
I think we can get there. If we work hard to ADD new Democrats to the Senate (ie: by replacing REPUBLICANS... not by primarying Democrats.) then Manchin will be irrelevant.
lapucelle
(18,376 posts)Kamala Harris is a Hard-Core Liberal
https://www.ontheissues.org/Kamala_Harris.htm
https://bit.ly/3qnRYBd
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)as someone pointed out Biden certainly appears way more left than he ever let on. I think it is the times and what is allowed today, was never allowed during Obama time. But I agree. Those two are not really centralists. Not sure what they are but using the Democratic title allows us to be in majority and get that bill rammed thru.
BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)We've been calling Biden, Obama, Harris centrist even though they are left of center. What I am really trying to say is Joe Manchin is not one of us. Don't put him off on us, lol.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)incorrect perspective and it does not matter how often the facts or correct info is provided for them, they refuse the information because it does not serve them. I am not going to pretend and suppose on incorrect information. Then gaslighting wins.
Demsrule86
(68,753 posts)pnwmom
(109,021 posts)Progressive Punch says he votes with us overall 62% of the time, which ranks him as #50 in the Senate. Hard to be much more in the middle than that.
https://progressivepunch.org/scores.htm?house=senate
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)DTomlinson
(411 posts)LizBeth
(9,952 posts)DTomlinson
(411 posts)Not sure how you can get more left-wing within American politics than that. Unless you're defining "progressive" and "left-wing" differently.
Maybe there is something to these rankings if they're based on congressional roll call votes, but I'd just note that Sanders will disagree with Democrats from the Left...not remotely for the same reasons (or unreasons) Republicans disagree. Just something to keep in mind...
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)and do the research for you, though.
DTomlinson
(411 posts)Response to DTomlinson (Reply #79)
LizBeth This message was self-deleted by its author.
DTomlinson
(411 posts)Have a good day.
BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)How they vote and legislation they have introduced. The problem is people perceive politicians ideology any way they want or whatever feels right to them. Harris has ranked more progressive than Sanders but people repeatedly say Sanders is the most because that is what they want to believe.
lapucelle
(18,376 posts)DTomlinson
(411 posts)lapucelle
(18,376 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,252 posts)And yet they just voted for the most progressive piece of legislation in decades.
KentuckyWoman
(6,697 posts)A centrist who wants to balance the needs of rich and poor, corporate and public etc, is going to clearly see that pendulum is way too far on the rich, corporate side. We need to be pushing to move it back to the middle - meaning toward the left.
And we have a LONG way to go leftward before we hit middle.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Centrist is Kool-Aid dishonest and Kool-Aid slur. Here's a govtrack.us graph showing HRC's ideological and leadership rating while U.S. senator (she's the purple dot in the upper middle of the left):
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/hillary_clinton/300022
But honest Democrats know her from her very liberal and very ambitiously progressive platform also.
Btw, there's a deceitful effort by deceivers to portray the relatively few people on the IL-liberal left as "liberal" and/or "progressive," setting the stage to portray everyone else (80 million 2020 voters!) as progressively less so, until most liberals are misidentified as ideologically "centrist" or "moderates," neither good liberal fish nor conservative fowl.
A simple way to identify IL-liberal left activists is by behaviors:
* They actively oppose (not just disagree with) those 80 million liberal progressive voters,
* even over and above Republicans (this is a strong identifier, who are they constantly acting against?),
* even to the point of being willing to steal elections to win (most are anti-democratic because they're both too radically righteous to properly evaluate what's right and wrong and too few to win elections)
* even to the point of throwing progressivism to the Republican wolves while trying to defeat Democrats.
* If someone claims to be more liberal than Democrats but behavior sometimes makes you think of trumpists, ("Lock her up!" "Democrats are corrupt corporatists!" "We're going to primary vulnerable Democratic senators." think the IL-liberal left.
betsuni
(25,745 posts)bigtree
(86,013 posts)...'centrist' and 'moderate' suggesting that other viewpoints within the party are outside of a mainstream of opinion, and not just arbitrary disagreement or different perspective on some issues.
Their political stance is inherently confrontational, divisive, and exclusive.
I'd also note that 'progressive' and 'liberal' are aspirational identifications against the republican, conservative opposition, not expressions against their own party, like self-identified moderates and centrists posturing against Democrats - telling us we can't have this or that, or need to accept less than we deserve or should expect from a body which regulary votes itself raises without hesitation, or never lacks in defending their own privilege.
Kaleva
(36,375 posts)If one is on the far fringe and uses themselve as a reference point, everyone else appears to be far away.
I would agree that Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Schumer, Obama, and Hillary are part of the center of our party as that's where the majority of our party members, the base, are.
George II
(67,782 posts)dianaredwing
(406 posts)That was getting a little bizarre. Why is it necessary to point score every activity every democrat makes? Naturally, they are individuals with individual constituencies that sometimes have differing needs and opinions. There will be controversy. That is why we have cooperation and mediation. That is what makes democrats and republicans fundamentally different. Democrats are willing to cooperate with those who do not think EXACTLY as they wish them to. Republicans will NEVER cooperate.
andym
(5,446 posts)If the center of the Democratic party, Manchin and Simena are not there, but if the center of the nation, then they are probably near there.
mvd
(65,180 posts)Sanders, Warren, AOC, etc. - progressive
Biden, Harris - left of center
Obama, Hillary - moderate
Manchin, Sinema - slightly right of center
Romney, Collins, Murkowski - right of center
Most of the other Repukes - GQP, extreme right
At least that is what the definitions should be IMO. The spectrum has been skewed by the Repukes.
BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)Thank you for that. It makes a lot of sense to me. Although some progressives are not so much progressive when it comes to social issues.
pnwmom
(109,021 posts)That makes him a centrist. The next most moderate Republican, Susan Collins, only 34%. Not even close.
https://progressivepunch.org/scores.htm?house=senate
Demsrule86
(68,753 posts)jorgevlorgan
(8,346 posts)He is not compromising between the mainstream qop (basically terrorists) and the reasonable pragmatic goals that are needed. Sinema and Manchin, however....
Demsrule86
(68,753 posts)can't be done in reconciliation...get over it. What do you suppose we would get if McConnell was in charge?
jorgevlorgan
(8,346 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 7, 2021, 05:14 PM - Edit history (1)
Living in poverty and on the verge of starving. They (and the six others voting with the qop) were wrong. Get over it. But if you are actually saying 42 Dems were wrong, that is something worth discussing.
BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)to be able to bypass that rule with VP Kamala Harris's help id we had Manchin and Sinema on board.
Iggo
(47,584 posts)Im completely unsurprised by Manchin, as absolutely everyone else here should be.
I have to admit, Sinema caught me by surprise. Though perhaps she wouldnt have if Id been paying attention to her. Which I definitely was not.
LeftInTX
(25,699 posts)Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Jon Tester of Montana, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire voted against proceeding, though the tally remains open. So did two close Biden allies, Chris Coons and Tom Carper of Delaware. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), who caucuses with the Senate Democrats, also opposed it.
Bonn1997
(1,675 posts)pnwmom
(109,021 posts)BGBD
(3,282 posts)Just voted for one of the most progressive bills of the past 50 years.
A couple years ago Manchin votes to uphold ACA.
He voted twice to convict Trump.
Almost a republican?
I wish I lived in a world where the debate for minimum wage was if it should be $12 or $15 an hour. Republicans want to eliminate minimum wage, not increase it to $12.
Mr.Bill
(24,348 posts)as if they represent no one but themselves. But that's true of a lot of politicians.
Response to BlueLucy (Original post)
ahoysrcsm This message was self-deleted by its author.
betsuni
(25,745 posts)Before she ran for president she'd read Peter Barnes' "With Liberty and Dividends for All: How to Save Our Middle Class When Jobs Don't Pay Enough" and his idea of a fund using revenue from shared national resources to pay a dividend to every citizen, like how the Alaska Permanent Fund distributes the state's oil royalties every year.
"Shared national resources include oil and gas extracted form public lands and the public airwaves used by broadcasters and mobile phone companies, but that gets you only so far. If you view the nation's financial system as a shared resource, then you can start raising real money from things like a financial transition tax. Same with the air we breathe and carbon pricing. Once you capitalize the fund, you can provide every American with a modest basic income every year. Besides cash in people's pockets, it would also be a way of making every American feel more connected to our country and to one another -- part of something bigger than ourselves. ... We would call it 'Alaska for America.' Unfortunately, we couldn't make the numbers work. To provide a meaningful dividend each year to every citizen, you'd have to raise enormous sums of money, and that would either mean a lot of new taxes or cannibalizing other important programs."
Then she says some Republicans had proposed a nationwide carbon dividend program that would tax fossil fuel use, but couldn't make the numbers work on that one either.
Someone will eventually figure out a way to make it work. But I guess it can't be progressive if Hillary wanted to do it. And if anything's a Republican idea, that's out too -- to this day people still whine about the ACA supposedly being a Republican idea -- how many times did the Republicans try to repeal it? Progress means getting things done to help people, not labels or whose idea it was or slogans.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,778 posts)scipan
(2,361 posts)Of course Bernie is farther left than the bulk of Dems.
Glad ppl are trying to capture the mantle of "progressive".
I am a democrat who agrees with virtually everything Bernie is for.
Especially when he talks about mega corporations.
radius777
(3,635 posts)For Manchin to nitpick about the unemployment assistance amount/duration, the eligibility for the stimulus checks etc during a national crisis is a conservative mindset that is focused on what the middle class or poor are 'getting away with' rather than looking at what the rich/one percent (where the true money is, they did great during the pandemic) are doing. Sinema also with her arrogant thumbs down, applauding Trump's tax cuts, etc.
The left/right graphs and other 'statistics' don't really capture the totality of a politican, as alot of being a politician is what one projects on the cultural stage via their words and actions. Manchin and Sinema clearly project a conservative ethos and seem to disdain even mainstream liberals (Sinema in her campaign said she would not support Schumer as leader, and also threw shade on Pelosi). I have zero tolerance for this as it only helps to further the 'scary liberals' Fox news narrative.
We're stuck with Manchin as WV is too red, but Sinema is from purple AZ (that Biden and Kelly won) and should be primaried with a better Dem.