General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWorkers at Amazon's Bessemer, Ala., warehouse have voted not to unionize
Workers at Amazons Bessemer, Ala., warehouse have voted not to unionize, a major victory for the e-commerce giant but not the end of the fight for labor organizers.
Out of the 3,215 employees who participated, 1,798 "no" votes and 738 "yes" votes were recorded before voided and challenged ballots were counted. Fifty-percent plus one of the employees would have had to vote yes for the union to gain National Labor Relations Board recognition.
Although the initial vote has gone against them, the union plans to challenge the results
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/547347-amazon-warehouse-workers-vote-not-to-unionize-in-alabama
irisblue
(33,034 posts)Freethinker65
(10,057 posts)The workers have no better opportunities in Alabama. That is why Amazon located there. A supply of low skilled workers they can train and pay less than if located anywhere else. Sad.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)Freethinker65
(10,057 posts)It would have been hard to get to 50% + 1. Go after Amazon for the anti-union influencing BS so that there are consequences and other businesses do not follow it. Challenging the vote will not change the outcome.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)game anyway, no matter the bosses or state. Under the PRO Act, this wouldn't have been an issue at all.
MichMan
(11,974 posts)Union says that was illegal even though all the mail was collected by unionized USPS employees.
People of course were free to mail their ballots from anywhere else.
Seems ridiculous to challenge a mailbox that made voting easier.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)in the box outside the door" with the implication being that Amazon would know how people voted, intimidating them to vote no or not vote at all. It didn't look like the familiar blue mailbox just sitting on the curb -- it was in a tent and looked more like one of the centralized unit you see at a cul-de-sac.
MichMan
(11,974 posts)How would Amazon know how someone who dropped off a ballot on a mailbox was voting?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)MichMan
(11,974 posts)because the Post Office put up a convenient mailbox that made it easier for people to mail their ballots in a vote by mail election.
I understand what the basis is by the union with their complaint, but given all the recent attention to mail in voting, it makes the nature of the complaint seem ridiculous and frivolous.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)The NLRB denied a drop box on Amazon property specifically because of the issues that can raise. Amazon went directly to the USPS to request a box. Not only does the action corrupt the union election, but taints the idea of mail-in voting for all elections.
Initech
(100,104 posts)crickets
(25,983 posts)They had a chance to get improvements to their working conditions and benefits and didn't take it. It's a shame.
Elessar Zappa
(14,065 posts)propaganda is strong. Many workers have been fed the lie that unions will just cost them money without any benefits. We need to change that narrative somehow.
LymphocyteLover
(5,654 posts)Aristus
(66,462 posts)This was your chance. Your shot. Your opportunity to make things better for yourselves.
Shame you passed on it...
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)facility. It's a long game.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)--The union membership rate of public-sector workers (34.8 percent) continued to be
more than five times higher than the rate of private-sector workers (6.3 percent).
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm
MichMan
(11,974 posts)Not even close.
Akoto
(4,267 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)Takket
(21,629 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,443 posts)MichMan
(11,974 posts)lpbk2713
(42,766 posts)They voted against their own interests.