General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRecount done for 2.1 million ballots in audit of Maricopa County election
PHOENIX The hand recount of 2.1 million ballots from the 2020 Maricopa County election has been completed, an Arizona Senate spokesman said Monday.
Three boxes of Braille ballots about 50 to 60 in total were left to be counted along with large-type, overseas military and duplicated ballots but all others had gone through the process, which began April 23.
Ken Bennett, state Senate audit liaison, has said the end of the hand count wouldnt immediately signal a final audit report.
snip>
You got to read the rest...it is a hoot.
https://ktar.com/story/4496413/recount-done-for-2-1-million-ballots-in-audit-of-maricopa-county-election/
Hugin
(33,140 posts)I'm floored they didn't immediately blurt out, "IT WUZ STOLENZ!111!!!i!!1"
But, you know it's coming. Wait for it... Wait for it...
Deminpenn
(15,286 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)The ballots were spoiled in Day One, when the "auditors" were seen with blue pens in their hot little hands, and the process discredited when they kicked out observers on Day Two or Day There.
No result has credibility. None. The original results are the only valid results.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)
is not very good at hiding it
Fann has said the aim of the audit is to restore faith in the election system and find ways to improve Arizonas voting laws, not to reverse the result of the election.
But they are only cyber ninja-ing the prez and Senate races narrowly won by Dems. Hmmmm.
GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)It is neither. It meets none of the formal criteria for a legal audit. As FiveThirtyEight says, it is a "partisan inquisition. Continuing to refer to it as "audit" or "recount" only legitimizes what is not legitimate, and will only lead to more of this kind of stunt elsewhere.
kentuck
(111,094 posts)More accurately.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,175 posts)Resources have been shifting to a paper examination of mail ballot envelopes for signatures as counting has come to a finish.
Bennett said that process is to address questions such as Are there folds in the 1.9 million ballots that came in and out by mail? Are alignment marks on the fronts and the backs of the ballot aligning as authentic ballots should? Is there a depression in the oval where a human hand-held device would have filled in that oval as opposed to an inkjet printer or a Xerox machine or whatever you might think?
Other parts of the audit still to come could potentially include a second tabulation of scanned images, but Bennett or others havent provided details about what that might entail if it happens.
I guess they didn't find any bamboo filaments in the ballots themselves, so now they're going to check the mailing envelopes for evidence that they were mailed from Beijing. Oh, and a heads up for Ken: a "human hand-held device" used to fill in the oval is commonly called a "pen" among professionals.
And they're still looking for the joker who smeared a small amount of panda feces over TFG's name on the ballot and whether or not that should count as a vote.
spanone
(135,831 posts)Roisin Ni Fiachra
(2,574 posts)against AZ State Senators and any other AZ officials or individuals complicit in this breach of voter privacy, and monumental waste of taxpayer time and money.
kentuck
(111,094 posts)I thought it was reported 50-60,000 ??
kentuck
(111,094 posts)They will need to do DNA tests to find out for sure?
panader0
(25,816 posts)They'd probably say, "Wait, we are not done. The envelopes have to be examined to determine
if they were made by humans or reptiles."