Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Merrick Garland Acts Like Donald Trump's Lawyer
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/06/merrick-garland-joe-biden-donald-trump-policies-doj-court-cases/How Merrick Garland Acts Like Donald Trumps Lawyer
The Justice Department wants to defend the executive branch. That means defending Trump.
Dan Friedman
Under President Joe Biden, the Justice Department is defending many of the polices and prerogatives of former President Donald Trump. Six months after Trump left office, lawsuits on matters ranging from the Trump-Russia scandal to a rape allegation against the former president are still winding through courts, and DOJ is siding with the former president in some cases, and fighting Congress to keep Trump-era records secret in others.
The Justice Department appears to be doing this because it is run by lawyers eager to preserve executive branch power against legislators, and because Attorney General Merrick Garland wants to avoid re-litigating Trump-era controversies, according to aides.
DOJ, in other words, has decided to defend Trump to help Biden. But to Trumps critics, this stance amounts to a feckless stymying of accountability for a president and aides whose conduct was unprecedented in its lawlessness.
Here is a run-down of matters where the Justice Department is, at least in part, siding with or protecting Trump.
snip//
Guns
In May, 87 former federal prosecutors asked Garland to abandon a Trump administration policy of charging gun crimes that occur in the District of Columbia in federal court. The prosecutors say that due to stiff mandatory federal penalties for gun arrests, the policy disproportionately affected Black residents. Average sentences for gun crimes are about twice as high in the federal court system, the Washington Post has reported. But DOJ has so far indicated no plan to change course.
In May, 87 former federal prosecutors asked Garland to abandon a Trump administration policy of charging gun crimes that occur in the District of Columbia in federal court. The prosecutors say that due to stiff mandatory federal penalties for gun arrests, the policy disproportionately affected Black residents. Average sentences for gun crimes are about twice as high in the federal court system, the Washington Post has reported. But DOJ has so far indicated no plan to change course.
Immigration policies
While Biden has broken with many of Trumps draconian immigration policies, the Justice Department is quietly defending some Trump-era rules and their architects in court, the New York Times recently reported. DOJ lawyers have argued to keep in place a policy that bars immigrants with temporary protected status from gaining green cards with the support of their employer. They have also agreed to defend former members of the Trump administration, including Jeff Sessions and Stephen Miller, in lawsuits seeking damages for harm caused by the family-separation policy they advocated. This is a traditional step for DOJ to take. But Lee Gelernt, the deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Unions Immigrants Rights Project, told the Times that the department should reconsider due to the historically heinous conduct it is now defending. For the Biden DOJ to choose to represent the people who did the family-separation practice is deeply troubling, he said.
While Biden has broken with many of Trumps draconian immigration policies, the Justice Department is quietly defending some Trump-era rules and their architects in court, the New York Times recently reported. DOJ lawyers have argued to keep in place a policy that bars immigrants with temporary protected status from gaining green cards with the support of their employer. They have also agreed to defend former members of the Trump administration, including Jeff Sessions and Stephen Miller, in lawsuits seeking damages for harm caused by the family-separation policy they advocated. This is a traditional step for DOJ to take. But Lee Gelernt, the deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Unions Immigrants Rights Project, told the Times that the department should reconsider due to the historically heinous conduct it is now defending. For the Biden DOJ to choose to represent the people who did the family-separation practice is deeply troubling, he said.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1189 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Merrick Garland Acts Like Donald Trump's Lawyer (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2021
OP
Goodheart
(5,321 posts)1. Getting angrier by the day at one Mr. Garland.
jalan48
(13,863 posts)2. So it's black and white? Any Presidential action must be defended by the DOJ?
Ursus Rex
(148 posts)3. Any *Democratic* DOJ.
And yes, it's supposed to be non-partisan, but that ship sailed long ago.
It sounds like We must defend these governmental norms, so we can be assured theyll be intact for our Republican colleagues to choose to ignore when theyre in control!
jalan48
(13,863 posts)6. Feels more like the legitimization of authoritarian rule to me.
sop
(10,167 posts)5. I'm still waiting to see what Garland's DOJ will do as Republican legislatures continue suppressing
votes in state after state. Garland recently vowed to double the number of DOJ civil rights attorneys to fight Republican efforts to suppress votes. Hopefully, something will happen before the 2022 elections.
https://news.yahoo.com/ag-garland-says-the-justice-department-will-double-manpower-to-fight-voter-suppression-203230727.html
KPN
(15,643 posts)7. What ever happened to the maxim "nice guys come in last"?