General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHunter Biden paintings pose ethical challenge for president
WASHINGTON (AP) The White House has established an arrangement that would allow President Joe Bidens son Hunter to sell his artwork for tens of thousands of dollars without knowing the identity of the purchaser, an agreement established in attempt to avoid any potential ethical concerns surrounding his sales.
Under the arrangement, a private art gallery owner will set prices for his work and will handle all bidding and sales, but will not share any information about buyers or prospective buyers with Hunter or anyone in the administration. The deal was first reported by The Washington Post.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Friday that the gallerist would reject any offer out of the normal course and that the administration believes the agreement provides quite a level of protection and transparency." A person familiar with the arrangement noted that it requires the art dealer selling Hunter's work to turn down any buyer or offer that seems out of the ordinary, including any that comes in above the asking price. The person was not authorized to discuss the arrangement publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
After careful consideration a system has been established that allows for Hunter Biden to work in his profession within reasonable safeguards, Psaki told reporters.
Of course he has the right to pursue an artistic career, just like any child of a president has the right to pursue a career.
Read more: https://tucson.com/news/national/govt-and-politics/hunter-biden-paintings-pose-ethical-challenge-for-president/article_c2ace3c3-339a-5394-9632-f8be781e7738.html
It appears that the administration has come to appropriate resolutions to any foreseeable issues.
Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)peddled favors for cash right in the White House...I really don't give a damn. Hunter Biden has a right to work in his profession.
Rhiannon12866
(205,552 posts)Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)paleotn
(17,931 posts)Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)PatSeg
(47,517 posts)But it is because of the former guy, that I think the administration and the Bidens are going the extra mile to make sure there is no appearance of impropriety. Also they know how the right will twist anything to make Biden or any Democratic president look bad.
I really feel badly for Hunter Biden. He has been a target for republicans ever since it was believed his father would run for president. The right will attack anyone for anything while ignoring the graft and corruption in their own house.
Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)They will twist the Hunter situation no matter what. We should take a lesson from Northam who basically said what he said and ignored it and it was over.
PatSeg
(47,517 posts)that republicans will look for any appearance of weakness and they will attack. In the absence of any actual weakness, they will fabricate it. Anyone who runs against them knows to expect it. I feel badly for the Bidens. They are such a close knit family and nothing is more painful for them than to have a family member attacked.
patricia92243
(12,597 posts)this much trouble.
Does this mean that everything a presidents' grown children do has to be approved by whoever. God forbid if Hunter ever wants to sell his car.
gab13by13
(21,362 posts)c'mon people, enough.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Like all the cheap shit Ivanka was selling while her father was President.
BTW, those are actually some pretty good paintings, if you like modern art. Which I do. Wouldn't mind having some of them.
marble falls
(57,114 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)I have seen some of her shit in thrift shops, where TJ Maxx donated them after they couldn't sell them at a discount. The disposable crap Walmart sells is far more well-made.
Traildogbob
(8,761 posts)The Goya beans. I dont want to hear one day word about ethics after TFG and his whole damn herd of spawn, and his cult, have not one damn ethic. When Joe starts sexually assaulting women, bone porn stars, stealing from kids cancer charities, promotes Kamala being hanged, F**k I cant type fast enough to fill the list. Jared took $900 million dollar loan from the murderous country behind 9/11 to bail out his idiot ass.
Media, STFU trying to create damage to a real President. We wouldnt want Bishops to end his communion on Sundays.
KS Toronado
(17,270 posts)Maybe even hint who's label is on them.
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Remember that Oval Office stunt?
KS Toronado
(17,270 posts)I'd buy a print.
PatSeg
(47,517 posts)betsuni
(25,546 posts)(Painter was an ethics lawyer under G.W.B's administration), is uneasy about the arrangement.
PatSeg
(47,517 posts)They are surprisingly powerful and disturbing. Apparently GW has a conscience and a soul. Can you imagine Trump painting about the death and destruction he has caused?
betsuni
(25,546 posts)The best we can hope for is a nightmare once in a while.
PatSeg
(47,517 posts)Missed that it was from The Onion.
I think there could be nightmares. He does paint a lot of severely wounded vets and though he may not admit it, I think he feels responsible. His life would have been so much better if he'd never run for political office and the world would have been better off as well.
mopinko
(70,138 posts)the onion.
mopinko
(70,138 posts)meant for the smart aleck that posted.
Smackdown2019
(1,188 posts)So if any money is made by a Democrat Presidential family member legally, Republicans want their heads. If Republicans Presidential family makes money illegal and are caught, it's a political witchhunt?
We all need to ignore those A-holes and live in reality.... they dont!
padah513
(2,503 posts)I fixed it for you
CurtEastPoint
(18,652 posts)lookyhereyou
(140 posts)crickets
(25,981 posts)My first question on reading the article was, "what ethical challenges?" They've bent over backwards here to avoid any, which is miles beyond the complete lack of effort by relatives of the former WH occupant. This is a nonissue being plumped up as something it is not.
Jarqui
(10,126 posts)What right does anyone have to mess with the sale of art he created?
I have this funny feeling that the answer is : clearly and absolutely none.
So he's going along with this to protect his father. There's no other legitimate reason for it. He should be able to sell his art to the highest bidder like any other artist on the planet. Because of his father, he can't because of how the media will twist it.
But where were these critics when Ivanka got trademark concessions for her fashion business from the Chinses, etc? Where were these critics when the Trump sons sold off more than $100 million of their father's real estate? Where were these people when the Trump Hotel in Washington rented entire floors out to someone and nobody showed up? etc, etc. etc.
I think the Bidens have done all they could here. And it has compromised the return his son might have otherwise received for his art.
For every sentence uttered or written about this, there should be paragraphs or chapters or books on the Trumps.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)for the Truman administration. President Biden should follow. At least the support.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Truman
"At the beginning of her career, critical reviews of Truman's singing were positive, polite or diplomatic in tone, with some later reviewers speculating that negative opinions were held back out of deference for her father as a current sitting United States President.[2] This practice was broken in 1950 when Washington Post music critic Paul Hume wrote that Truman was "extremely attractive on the stage... [but] cannot sing very well. She is flat a good deal of the time. And still cannot sing with anything approaching professional finish." The review angered President Truman (who was dealing that same day with the sudden death of his childhood friend and White House Press Secretary Charlie Ross[7]), who wrote to Hume, "Some day I hope to meet you. When that happens you'll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for black eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!"[8] Hume wanted to publish the letter, but Washington Post publisher Philip Graham vetoed the idea. However, Hume showed the letter to a number of his colleagues, including Milton Berliner, music critic of the rival Washington Times, which published a story. The Post was then forced to acknowledge the letter, which drew international headlines, becoming a minor scandal for the Truman administration. Reviewers after that felt more free to be honest in their reviews of her performances, with mixed criticism for her singing thereafter.[2]"
NJCher
(35,688 posts)We have to set standards and an ethical framework because the other side cannot even conceive of such matters.
Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)as he doesn't work in the White House or they promote his paintings in some way...we play by the rules and the GOP blows the rules up. There can be no rules in that situation because it puts us at a disadvantage...you can not play by the rules and allow the other party to walk all over you. There are no rules in that situation. I well remember how Chelsea Clinton and the Obama girls were treated by the other party-they were kids. And I don't give a damn about 'rules' for us but none for the traitor party.
NJCher
(35,688 posts)for how to handle the influence peddling suspicions, not just by republicans but by independents and Democrats as well.
Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)GOP who supported the Trump kid's constant grift to pound sand. We won't play your game anymore. Have we seen Matt Gaetz resign yet? No, we haven't but Katie Hill resigned for consensual sex with a staffer. And we lost that seat. This sort of thing must stop.
Our people are targeted by the GOP...we damn near gave Virginia back to the GOP with the Northam and Fairfax scandal. They were also targeting the Democrat next in succession...the AG. We must play hardball.
Of topic, I am cleaning the house we sold today (taking a break at the moment) So I will be cooking again...it is finally over! I read the cooking forum everyday but have cooked almost nothing these last several months.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)paleotn
(17,931 posts)Hunter Biden is not president of the US. He's a private citizen, with no direct ties to the government or to anything of any importance. I could care less what he does, just like I didn't give two shits about the activities of Billy Carter or Roger Clinton.
When nothing particularly important has crossed the minds of journalists, those with attention spans of fruit flies, why must they go on and on about the unimportant? Just to hear themselves chatter? Stupid humans. Ugh.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Who cares? He's a private citizen, and he's not selling his paintings out of the basement of the White House.
Let's line up the financial "scandals" of Hunter Biden against the scandals of Junior, Eric, Ivanka, and Jared.
And when they bring up Hunter's admitted drug issues, we can just show the video of Junior at CPAC yesterday.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)dlk
(11,570 posts)The double-standard is disgusting!
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)He does just seem to be preying off of the President's name. Except for President Obama, there always seem to be relatives who do this. I still don't like it.
I remember Billy Beer.
Hekate
(90,719 posts)
administration in US history. The Trump admin corruption was enthusiastically participated in by every single adult member of his family, and enabled by an entire political party, which then tried to overthrow the US government.
So I question your discomfort, as it is so narrowly applied. Billy Beer? Really? Compared to Ivankas 30 Chinese patents that she immediately applied for and got as soon as Daddy was elected?
Hunter Biden isnt doing anything illegal, unethical, or immoral. Yet the RW will hunt him down and beat him to a bloody pulp, the way theyve tried to do to Hillary. Daily. Dont be fooled by their sudden sanctimony.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)I remember Donald Nixon, and wasn't Reagan's brother up to something?
But I don't think our side should get a pass. It's not illegal, but frankly, it stinks. I don't see why Hunter should be giving the other side ammunition.
He should spend the next eight years as far out of the public eye as possible.
Hekate
(90,719 posts)If he became a priest in his ancestral religion they would start asking if hed developed a sudden interest in small boys.
There is nothing he can do that will cause them to stop the abuse except commit suicide. Hes a wounded soul and they smell blood.
GoodRaisin
(8,924 posts)and they will make up lies about it anyway.
Deminpenn
(15,286 posts)If the Bidens don't know who bought the art, then that certainly reduces the chance to near zero the buyer could use his or her purchase to gain influence.
The 75k and up asking prices seem out of line for an inexperienced artist, though, but Hunter is entitled to try to earn a living as an artist.
On further thought, maybe instead of the buyers being anonymous, the auctioneer should have kept the artist's name anonymous and set the auction as a nothing special, garden variety art sale.
MichMan
(11,939 posts)Seems like the buyers could disclose anything they wanted to. If someone wants to spend large amounts of $$$ for art it is their business
I could see a buyer who wanted to influence Biden mentioning that he or she had bought one of Hunter's paintings.
FelineOverlord
(3,580 posts)Hunter is a private citizen. He can sell his work for whatever a buyer is willing lling to pay.
Resistance Twitter is responding with appropriate anger and mockery to the desperate attempts of reporters to somehow make this into a scandal.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Ellipsis
(9,124 posts)Is it worth $75k to a half Mil? ... not so much.
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/hunter-biden-gallery-show-1979790
Hekate
(90,719 posts)Good article, too.
Hekate
(90,719 posts)
his colors.
The gallery owner is setting the prices, iirc, and then theres speculation from WaPo and others in the media, demanding transparency. Screw them.
IcyPeas
(21,893 posts)This artwork by Biden is untitled but measures 24in x 48in and was created on sheet metal. His art dealer has priced Biden's artworks between $75,000 and $500,000
blogslug
(38,002 posts)The dealer is setting those prices and will get a cut of the sale. Artists are terrible at pricing their works. I'm not thrilled about giving buyers anonymity but numerous works have been sold to unknown purchasers. Some people buy art because they love it or want to support the artist. Others buy it as an investment or for bragging rights.
It's all subjective.
No matter what Hunter Biden does to make money, right-wing trolls are going to condemn him. This is perfectly cromulent art made with his own two hands. Good for him.
treestar
(82,383 posts)separate adults.
Maybe because of the former recent grifter family?
flying rabbit
(4,636 posts)Bucky
(54,027 posts)canetoad
(17,169 posts)Were in a ballpark figure for a first time exhibitor.
However, knowing the art world, it is just not possible for him to work his way up via exhibiting and sales as an unknown. Hunter Biden is who he is and the prices reflect the novelty value of a president's son selling artworks.
I have both curated and judged exhibitions and art prizes. It seems to me that creating this work is a therapeutic activity for Hunter. I also believe that any artist should take full advantage of a circumstance that favours the sale of their work; lord knows it's hard enough for artists to make a living in any society.
I'm hoping that Hunter's story brings attention to artists in every facet of society and their role in the mental well-being of humans across the globe.
Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)And I have no doubt, it is theurapeutic.
ZonkerHarris
(24,229 posts)Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)ZonkerHarris
(24,229 posts)They are good but that's not why people are willing to pay so much money for them.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)They're not to my taste, but that's irrelevant. Clearly, they take a lot of time to create. Are they valuable? Well, the market decides that, I think. I can't really see any controversy here, frankly.
He paints, apparently. I did not know that. I doubt he has any influence over his father, really. So, if his art dealer can sell them for whatever the market will bear, good for Hunter Biden.
If they want to set up a system where he doesn't know who buys them, that's fine with me, too.
I'm not seeing any issue here, really.
On another note, we have an entry atrium in our new split-level townhome. We just moved in and are trying to decide what to hang on our walls. We have lots of art, most of it by younger, aspiring artists we have known. But there is a wall in that atrium that is highly visible from the living room and is well-lit. It is crying out for a large piece of art hanging on it.
We have a good friend whose husband died not too long ago. He was a very accomplished artist who painted large-scale works. He never really sold any of them, and most were hanging in their house. His wife is one of my wife's best friends, so we contacted her about maybe buying one of his paintings for that wall. She's moving into a smaller place, and won't have a place for all of his artwork. She's coming to visit our new home tomorrow. We'll talk about it then, after she sees the space I'm talking about.
But, she doesn't want to sell any of her late husband's paintings. She suggested that she might simply loan one of them to us to hang for an indefinitely long term. Perhaps we'll let her do that. I'd like to see any of several of his dramatic large paintings I've seen hanging there. The biggest problem will be the mechanics of hanging it on that high wall. We'll have to hire someone to do that, since I don't go up on 12' ladders any more.
tenderfoot
(8,437 posts)eom
lame54
(35,295 posts)gulliver
(13,186 posts)No meetings. No phone calls. No contacts of any kind, direct or indirect, once it is known that someone bought one of the paintings. These kinds of ethics codes are common.
Hunter would still make a ton of money purely on name recognition and historicity. Heck, Republicans would be prime candidates as buyers. Hunter figures prominently in their fantasies already.