Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCourt "Completely Rejects" AZ Senate's Reason For Not Turning Over Cyber Ninjas Records
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
"AZ Law"
@arizonaslaw
BREAKING: Court "Completely Rejects" State Senate's Reason For Not Turning Over Audit-Related Records Held By Cyber Ninjas (READ Decision)
NUTSHELL: The Ninjas/Senate will need to turn over many more documents.
https://bit.ly/AZlaw1219
Karen Fann
Ninja Doug Logan
10:31 AM · Jul 15, 2021
"AZ Law"
@arizonaslaw
BREAKING: Court "Completely Rejects" State Senate's Reason For Not Turning Over Audit-Related Records Held By Cyber Ninjas (READ Decision)
NUTSHELL: The Ninjas/Senate will need to turn over many more documents.
https://bit.ly/AZlaw1219
Karen Fann
Ninja Doug Logan
10:31 AM · Jul 15, 2021
https://arizonaslaw.blogspot.com/2021/07/breaking-court-completely-rejects-state.html
A judge today "completely reject(ed)" State Senate President Karen Fann's reason for not turning over records related to her election audit. It does not matter whether the records are in the hands of the Cyber Ninjas or subcontractors, Judge Michael Kemp ruled.
"The Court finds that any and all documents with a substantial nexus to the audit activities are public records. This does not mean that all internal files of all government vendors constitute public records of the officer or public body with whom they contracted their services. The Court further finds that CNI and the subvendors are agents for the Senate Defendants who have at least constructive possession of the documents in question. In Court filings in a related case, Arizona Democratic Party, et al. v. Fann, et al., CV2020-006646, Defendant Fann admitted that CNI and Mr. Bennett were the Senates authorized agents."
Judge Kemp concluded his 6 1/2 page ruling with this clear message: " It is difficult to conceive of a case with a more compelling public interest demanding public disclosure and public scrutiny. The Motion to Dismiss is denied."
Full decision at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
15 replies, 2198 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (57)
ReplyReply to this post
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court "Completely Rejects" AZ Senate's Reason For Not Turning Over Cyber Ninjas Records (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Jul 2021
OP
Documentation of the Cyber Ninja / Arizona Reptilian Party's crimes will be even more amusing.
lagomorph777
Jul 2021
#3
the AZ fraudit only brings more reasons for other nations to doubt our strength and intention and re
lindysalsagal
Jul 2021
#13
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)1. This opinion will be fun to read
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)3. Documentation of the Cyber Ninja / Arizona Reptilian Party's crimes will be even more amusing.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)2. Uh-Oh...
Didn't think of that...
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)4. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread Nevilledog.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)7. Such an embarrassment for the state of AZ..
Don't know for sure but did Bennett say he wouldn't comply?..Read on twitter feed..
Also, from link..
In a separate ruling this morning, Kemp also rejected efforts by Fann and the Cyber Ninjas to yank a related case - from the Arizona Republic - from Judge John Hannah. The effort to transfer/consolidate is just one of the legal tactics they have used to get rid of Judge Hannah - Arizona's Law separately reported yesterday on the Motion to Disqualify him
WHITT
(2,868 posts)8. Da Judge
It is difficult to conceive of a case with a more compelling public interest demanding public disclosure and public scrutiny
Ain't taken' no shit.
Volaris
(10,272 posts)10. Ya that's judge speak for :because I SAID SO, that's fucking why
And that's a really dangerous place to be if you're the one getting told that shit lol.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)9. The financial audit of the Cyber Ninja contract with AZ State Senate
will be a barrel of monkeys.
Nevilledog
(51,122 posts)12. And the monkeys are flinging poo.
Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)11. REpubs ain't big on transparency and accountability...
time to do a deep dive, cavity search level inspection of that fiasco.
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)13. the AZ fraudit only brings more reasons for other nations to doubt our strength and intention and re
resolve, which is exactly what putin wanted.
ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)14. I have just one word for this decision....
cynical_idealist
(360 posts)15. What's the penalty for manufacturing false evidence?