General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Book of Jobs -by Joseph Stiglitz: "we need to embark on a massive investment program"
The Book of Jobs
Joseph Stiglitz
Vanity Fair
January 2012 Edition
...A banking system is supposed to serve society, not the other way around.
from page 3: That we should tolerate such a confusion of ends and means says something deeply disturbing about where our economy and our society have been heading. Americans in general are coming to understand what has happened. Protesters around the country, galvanized by the Occupy Wall Street movement, already know.
......................
It has now been almost five years since the bursting of the housing bubble, and four years since the onset of the recession. There are 6.6 million fewer jobs in the United States than there were four years ago. Some 23 million Americans who would like to work full-time cannot get a job. Almost half of those who are unemployed have been unemployed long-term. Wages are fallingthe real income of a typical American household is now below the level it was in 1997.
We knew the crisis was serious back in 2008. And we thought we knew who the bad guys werethe nations big banks, which through cynical lending and reckless gambling had brought the U.S. to the brink of ruin. The Bush and Obama administrations justified a bailout on the grounds that only if the banks were handed money without limitand without conditionscould the economy recover. We did this not because we loved the banks but because (we were told) we couldnt do without the lending that they made possible. Many, especially in the financial sector, argued that strong, resolute, and generous action to save not just the banks but the bankers, their shareholders, and their creditors would return the economy to where it had been before the crisis. In the meantime, a short-term stimulus, moderate in size, would suffice to tide the economy over until the banks could be restored to health.
The banks got their bailout. Some of the money went to bonuses. Little of it went to lending. And the economy didnt really recoveroutput is barely greater than it was before the crisis, and the job situation is bleak. The diagnosis of our condition and the prescription that followed from it were incorrect. First, it was wrong to think that the bankers would mend their waysthat they would start to lend, if only they were treated nicely enough. We were told, in effect: Dont put conditions on the banks to require them to restructure the mortgages or to behave more honestly in their foreclosures. Dont force them to use the money to lend. Such conditions will upset our delicate markets. In the end, bank managers looked out for themselves and did what they are accustomed to doing.
.............
the rest (3 pages - very good read):
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/01/stiglitz-depression-201201
ProSense
(116,464 posts)no one sums up the situation better than Stiglitz.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)They've been right about everything for the last ten years.
And no Democrat seems to ever listen to them.
opihimoimoi
(52,426 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)K&R.