Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhen the Supreme Court Ruled a Vaccine Could Be Mandatory
History.comIn 1901 a deadly smallpox epidemic tore through the Northeast, prompting the Boston and Cambridge boards of health to order the vaccination of all residents. But some refused to get the shot, claiming the vaccine order violated their personal liberties under the Constitution.
One of those holdouts, a Swedish-born pastor named Henning Jacobson, took his anti-vaccine crusade all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's top justices issued a landmark 1905 ruling that legitimized the governments authority to reasonably infringe upon personal freedoms during a public health crisis by issuing a fine to those who refused vaccination.
...snip...
In the case known as Jacobson v. Massachusetts, Jacobsons lawyers argued that the Cambridge vaccination order was a violation of their clients 14th Amendment rights, which forbade the state from depriv[ing] any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. At question, then, was whether the right to refuse vaccination was among those protected personal liberties.
The Supreme Court rejected Jacobsons argument and dealt the anti-vaccination movement a stinging loss. Writing for the majority, Justice John Marshall Harlan acknowledged the fundamental importance of personal freedom, but also recognized that the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand.
One of those holdouts, a Swedish-born pastor named Henning Jacobson, took his anti-vaccine crusade all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation's top justices issued a landmark 1905 ruling that legitimized the governments authority to reasonably infringe upon personal freedoms during a public health crisis by issuing a fine to those who refused vaccination.
...snip...
In the case known as Jacobson v. Massachusetts, Jacobsons lawyers argued that the Cambridge vaccination order was a violation of their clients 14th Amendment rights, which forbade the state from depriv[ing] any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. At question, then, was whether the right to refuse vaccination was among those protected personal liberties.
The Supreme Court rejected Jacobsons argument and dealt the anti-vaccination movement a stinging loss. Writing for the majority, Justice John Marshall Harlan acknowledged the fundamental importance of personal freedom, but also recognized that the rights of the individual in respect of his liberty may at times, under the pressure of great dangers, be subjected to such restraint, to be enforced by reasonable regulations, as the safety of the general public may demand.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1692 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (27)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When the Supreme Court Ruled a Vaccine Could Be Mandatory (Original Post)
brooklynite
Aug 2021
OP
Interesting and informative. Thanks. Will archive for future reference.
RestoreAmerica2020
Aug 2021
#1
RestoreAmerica2020
(3,438 posts)1. Interesting and informative. Thanks. Will archive for future reference.
Paz.
Haggard Celine
(16,849 posts)2. Good decision.
I was talking to my parents yesterday about all of this. They said that they lined up for their polio shots when they were young and always had all of their other shots to be allowed in school. I had to take all of my shots, too. I remember that I had to go back to the health department in the summer before I went off to college and they gave me more shots so that I would be allowed to live in the dorms. These people who refuse to get vaccinated are acting like spoiled children, and they're a public health hazard. I don't know what to do about it, though. Things have gone so far now, and the virus is mutating and spreading like wildfire. It's a mess!
malaise
(269,157 posts)3. Off to the greatest page
informative
LeftInTX
(25,504 posts)4. There is a new high school nearby named after Justice Harlan.
XanaDUer2
(10,713 posts)5. Nowadays, Typhoid Mary could open a hotdog stand nt
Smackdown2019
(1,190 posts)6. She did!
Trump was the virus and the Republican party is sick!
tclambert
(11,087 posts)7. In Florida or Texas, of course.