General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMonoclonal antibodies are great but they are no substitute for vaccinations
I am fully vaxxed and will be getting a booster as soon as the guidelines are formally announced. I will use monoclonal if I test postivie or I am exposed. However Monoclonals are not a substitute for vaccination
Link to tweet
RockRaven
(14,984 posts)and at a cheaper price than the single can of gas.
Thunderbeast
(3,417 posts)The expensive monoclonal antibodies put profits into the pockets of DeSantis' largest donor.
Does it make sense now?
FarPoint
(12,426 posts)Not now as we are in clinical crisis mode....Blah, blah blah about profiteers, ...yea, what else is new? I'm looking harder and harder regarding mitigating this virus....The profit zone, save for another day because it is not going away....
Kablooie
(18,637 posts)Republicans are no substitute for horses.
Response to Kablooie (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,481 posts)If I test positive for COVID, I will get monoclonal antibody treatment as soon as possible. I have a number of risk factors and under state and CDC guidelines I qualify for monoclonal treatment if I am exposed or test positive. Monoclonal treatments are great but they do not replace vaccinations.
Link to tweet
"My wife was vaccinated. I wasn't. She stayed sick for two days. I stayed sick for ten, and it was miserable. Absolutely miserable," he said.
Monoclonal antibodies typically cost more than $1,000 per dose, but governments buy them and send them to hospitals and clinics so people can get them at little to no cost. However, supply is limited, and depending on the location, it might not be that easy to get.