General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRichard Engel Is Very, Very Sad About U.S. Leaving Afghanistan
https://crooksandliars.com/2021/08/richard-engel-very-very-sad-about-us8/31/21 4:38am
Richard Engel Is Very, Very Sad About U.S. Leaving Afghanistan
For decades, we have poured billions into our wars -- while fighting over every penny intended for the poor.
By Susie Madrak
While we see elite military advisors and journalists predicting dark things for America as a result of leaving Afghanistan, I thought about Martin Luther King Jr.'s seminal speech, "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time To Break Silence":
For years, we've asked, "Why can't America feed our hungry, or provide health care for the sick? Why is there always enough money for war?"
Well, war makes defense contractors, mercenaries, and assorted other people rich. And it gives journalists a high profile that increases their career standing and clout.
Link to tweet
Maybe this is one of the reasons Richard Engel is so sad. While war is hell, adrenaline is addicting, and soldiers often have a hard time adjusting to relative calm. The same is probably true of journalists: "Without the war, who am I?"
Well, Richard, your feelings should not be the basis of foreign policy.
You said, "This is the worst capitulation of Western values in my lifetime." Really, Richard? More than the entire Trump era?
Your speech crossed a line, I think. You are neither a historian, nor a pundit. Finally, Richard, you are no Walter Cronkite. No doubt your employer will try to equate your speech with his, but you fall far short of the standard.
We know which side today's media is on, and it ain't ours.
Thank you, President Biden, for choosing the rest of us over the Endless Wars.
pwb
(11,292 posts)Give him a gun next time to fight and he may not want to stay so long.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Both are as bloody as Afghanistan in recent months.
Or, if he wants to stay in the Middle East, Lebanon looks likely to heat up any week now.
Ilsa
(61,700 posts)Being bilingual in Arabic made his career.
spanone
(135,897 posts)Zambero
(8,974 posts)Then 20 years on someone finally switched off the light. By all appearances, it appears that at least one war correspondent had development a long-term dysfunctional love affair with the war he chose to cover. And as one popular song has so aptly stated, "Breaking Up Is Hard To Do".
Glorfindel
(9,739 posts)Maybe he can go find another war in Somalia or Ethiopia to enjoy.
agingdem
(7,864 posts)how about he stay home and cover the war Gosar, Jordan, Gaetz, Greene, Boebert, Cawthorn, Johnson, Cruz, McCarthy et al. are waging with the United States...this war has it all...fascism, extreme violence, treason, sedition, destruction, anti-American flags, death, gallows..what's not to like???
Glorfindel
(9,739 posts)steventh
(2,143 posts)Engel's statement was a surprise when I heard it. An unpleasant surprise.
agingdem
(7,864 posts)20 years of being the go-to war guy...Rachel loved him..Mika and Joe loved him...heady stuff and now nada...how dare Joe end this Bush/Cheney disaster!...I mean who the hell does Joe think he is taking this away from him...the President of the United States or something??? I'm thinking maybe Richard should schedule some quality time with a shrink...
Demsrule86
(68,710 posts)agingdem
(7,864 posts)"the media (medium) became the message"...Engel was always the story..wars and conflict zones were just backdrop..Richard Engel "reporting" from a balcony in: Afghanistan/Iran/Yemen/Syria/Libya/Somalia... Richard Engel kidnapped (or maybe not)..SHOCK AND AWE, baby!...oh, ya..about the war...
Great post! All of it truthful, sadly.
Thrill
(19,178 posts)PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)experienced by many members of the military as well as journalists reporting from war zones in his 2002 book War is a Force that gives Us Meaning.
I read his book n 2003 because I was so angry and saddened by our invasion of Iraq. The book is even more relevant today as a frame through which to view he 20 years the US spent in Afghanistan and the current criticisms of the withdrawal by the architects of the war and those who reported on it.
There is a great summary of the book here:
https://www.supersummary.com/war-is-a-force-that-gives-us-meaning/summary/
Below is an excerpt:
Hedges ends the book with a study of the effects that the narcotic of war has on individuals. He uses his own experience with soldiers and other journalists to underscore the addictive nature of war, describing the rush of adrenaline and euphoria that can accompany battles and the deep lows that follow after the mind and body crash after the excitement. This is very similar what a drug addict experiencesintense highs followed by dreadful lows that can, in the short term, only be cured by chasing another high. He notes the prevalence of drug use and addiction among soldiers and how it intensifies when they return home, seeking to replicate their experiences.
Hedges book is a singular work that studies war not from a military or tactical point of view, but as a psychological phenomenon. His arguments that myth is essential to warfare and that manipulation of nationalist and ethnic identities to perpetuate itand that individuals enjoy war in complex ways that may be difficult to explainare innovative ways of pondering why civilizations spend so much blood and treasure fighting each other.
malaise
(269,212 posts)He's addicted to war.
dalton99a
(81,635 posts)He adores Bush and Cheney
malaise
(269,212 posts)but then I'm anti-war
Paladin
(28,277 posts)dalton99a
(81,635 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,177 posts)neocon warmongers. The news media just love conflict. It pays the bills.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)It was CNN that tried to paint that narrative. That somehow the war was noble and we were standing up for freedom there.
Fuck them.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)The only reason to be in Afghanistan was to whack Bin Laden. We should have ignored the Taliban entirely and never tried to drag them into the 21st Century (or even the 19th) at the muzzle of a gun.
Bush should have gotten us out; Obama should have gotten out; Trump should have gotten out. But they didn't.
Biden did. And I don't know how this will play out, politically, but I'm willing to bet that history will give Biden high marks for his management of this crisis and other ones on his plate right now.
KPN
(15,665 posts)President. He is the President America needed in a time of deep and daunting crises.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)For everything not going 100% smoothly during a crisis.
That's what makes it a crisis. Withdrawing a military after a country collapses to a band of warlords isn't supposed be like planning a freaking wedding reception.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Can come up with is: Reinvade Afghanistan.
KPN
(15,665 posts)history as a great one -- he already is in my book.
George II
(67,782 posts)....should contact MSNBC and tell them that they won't watch their channel until Engel is removed permanently.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)fear. There is no lead anchor tied to your ass.
kairos12
(12,879 posts)sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)McKim
(2,412 posts)Love these comments, the posters on this story are just so right!!!!Especially enjoyed the Chris Hedges quote. The whole nation is addicted to war, in my opinion. We watch it on TV like a football game and with the same competitive spirit. Thee is something primitive and childlike, violent about this. The TV watchers just hate to lose the game!!! Well, it's time to grow up, America! War is NOT a game, its a horrible destructive force. We have to find another way to be!
malaise
(269,212 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 31, 2021, 11:38 AM - Edit history (1)
I remember watching the illegal invasion of Iraq- there was a British commentator on BBC describing the beauty of the Western bombs killing innocent civilians in their own home country. It was like fireworks to that asshole. And yet they call us the barbarians in our shitholes countries.
llmart
(15,556 posts)I remember during the first Iraq war I was completely disgusted with Wolf Blitzer who every night was absolutely orgasmic reporting on the bombing that was killing civilians in Iraq. I refused to watch any of it after that.
malaise
(269,212 posts)It's sick and sad
llmart
(15,556 posts)At the time I worked with mostly men in an office setting and they would get all frothed up at what they had seen on CNN the night before. It disgusted me. It was like they'd watched a sporting event or something. Of course none of them were in any danger of being sent there to fight, so all fun and games.
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)tinrobot
(10,926 posts)As a war reporter, it is in his best interest for wars to happen.
Same goes for defense contractors (who should really be called war contractors). They make a lot of money off of war.
And, to some degree, the military as well (mostly those who give the orders, not those who carry them out). Careers are made in combat.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)He didn't fire one shot.
He didn't lose any close childhood friends like many of us did in Vietnam or Iraq or Afghan. He didn't pick up the Stars and Stripes aind read under the heading "Killed in Action" childhood friends that lived within 1 mile or just blocks from his childhood home
So Fuck you Richard Engle you Neocon and don't give me this shit "we fought them there so we wouldn't have to fight them here"
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.
Texin
(2,599 posts)He probably figured he'd get an anchor desk like Wolf Blitzer.
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)This year....not so much.
Demsrule86
(68,710 posts)OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)Pisces
(5,602 posts)His whole life, not about the money and fame. Where is the emotional intelligence on this board??? He is compromised and not reporting like a robot. Sorry if everything hes saying isnt scripted to your pleasure. This guy needs to decompress to have perspective.
He may be an adrenaline junkie, but we need people like this in the field. He has blown up his entire life for reporting.
How quick people are to turn on someone who they hailed a hero fairly recently.
niyad
(113,600 posts)Demsrule86
(68,710 posts)I never considered him a hero anyway.
Pisces
(5,602 posts)War to him. Its living breathing people. We want to claim the Repubs dont have nuance in their vocabulary. What Im reading from some fair weather posters on this blog is the parallel universe.
I can find many glowing posts about Richard Engel when he was on the Rachel Maddow show a couple of years ago. Back then people were saying he needed a break. Our own pretzel flip on someone who says something that doesnt coincide with our narrative is crazy.
IronLionZion
(45,558 posts)dude is delusional. The US will be at war with somebody somewhere again soon. Too many people want it for profit and false patriotism.
karynnj
(59,507 posts)could be a turning point in the middle east. That in a sentence is the essence of what a neocon is.
As to his reporting over the years, he probably deserves the praise he got for being willing to get close enough to show people what was actually happening. However, that one sentence - stated as if it had no greater meaning, suggests that any OPINION he added to facts on events covered needs to be examined in light of that admitted bias.
I remember not understanding why the neocons could believe that a war in Iraq could be a turning point. It was 2005 before I read a NYT oped that spoke of how the neocons saw changing Iraq as a way to change the dynamics through the entire middle east. I was struck by how so many presumably intelligent people could believe such a risky, stupid idea. I concede that the war would by definition bring change, but for the life of me I can't see how it could be a positive reset of all the troubled dynamics of the Middle East. (Not to mention the immorality of killing so many Iraqis to cause this reset.)
Being a reporter in the field makes him an expert on the things he actually saw. Even then, there is always the problem that no one can see anything and what they see may actually differ based on their believes and who they trust. In addition, especially over time, there likely is an inclination to report what fits the narrative.
In fairness, he was just as angry in his reports on Trump abandoning the Kurds. Clearly from the sentence, he was already biased in favor of the Iraq invasion in concept even before it happened.
GoCubsGo
(32,096 posts)You'll have a big war here to cover in your own country if the Red Hat crowd has their way. And, if you're so concerned about women, why don't you go to Texas, and cover what's going on there? Or, is your concern selective?
ffr
(22,672 posts)ananda
(28,885 posts)Tough love is the only way out.
ancianita
(36,152 posts)of the world, saying that policing has always been our job.
And yet he never said a damn word about about Trump's capitulation to Western values for the Kurds; at best his reporting was lukewarm about the withdrawal because he knew he still had Afghanistan to live report from. But now that he's hit his dead end in conflict zone reporting with Biden, and so he's pissed.
Engel never could read policy on the ground, and he shouldn't now, either.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,683 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,781 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,288 posts)Traildogbob
(8,828 posts)South of us, that have women and children so abused, and lives threatened, they travel a thousands deadly miles to find safe haven, only to face Stephen Miller fan boys at the border. Pretty certain they have no chance of education or many liberties even Afghans have.
AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)Seriously.
If his main reason hes pissed is because the blood and guts are over, that tells me he needs an extended vacation and/or detox. Or counseling.
If his main reason is his career, then he is as much of a war profiteer as weapons dealers.
Both are sick reasons and NBC and MSNBC need to chill on giving him airtime for awhile. He needs to relearn (or learn) healthy perspective.
FSogol
(45,548 posts)Less people dying, but maybe something tragic will happen!
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,678 posts)he is part of the MIC and get's nothing if we stop fighting
Go away you corporate toad !