General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBillionaire ex-Walmart exec says the first 'settlers' of his planned $400 billion city 'Telosa' will
likely be selected through applications - and they could move in by 2030If Marc Lore's vision comes to fruition, 50,000 residents could be living in a egalitarian utopia by 2030.
Lore, who stepped down as CEO of Walmart's US e-commerce division earlier this year, announced last month that he plans to build a futuristic city known as Telosa. Telosa - which gets its name from an Ancient Greek word meaning "highest purpose" - plans to offer its citizens equal access to education, healthcare, and transportation. Residents will get around in autonomous vehicles and the city will run on renewable energy, Telosa's website promises.
While citizens of Telosa will be able to build their own homes and sell them, the city will maintain ownership of the land itself, Lore told USA Today's Scott Gleeson on Sunday. He calls his vision for the city "equitism" - a mash-up of equality and capitalism.
"The sole purpose of creating a city in the desert would be so it's owned by the community, basically take all the appreciation of the land and give it back to the citizens," Lore told USA Today. "Taxes paid will go back to the city for infrastructure - roads, tunnels and bridges - so everyone would know exactly where their money is going."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/billionaire-ex-walmart-exec-says-the-first-settlers-of-his-planned-dollar400-billion-city-telosa-will-likely-be-selected-through-applications-and-they-could-move-in-by-2030/ar-AAPFdfL
Utopia or pipe dream?
Bettie
(16,104 posts)At his company? Then, they can spend their pay at the company store?
Clash City Rocker
(3,396 posts)EYESORE 9001
(25,938 posts)in a vehicle powered by his self-satisfaction.
ZZenith
(4,122 posts)"Taxes paid will go back to the city for infrastructure - roads, tunnels and bridges"
Budi
(15,325 posts)Then Charles Manson happened! 😬
That walmart controlled community is the last place I'd live. A little too stepford for my taste, ya know?
Under The Radar
(3,401 posts)Which Disney gave up on the idea. There was still problems and there were many more rules as to the standards that your house and vehicles had to be maintained and they were inspected regularly. There was still some crime and the cost was extremely expensive.
Joinfortmill
(14,419 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)Good because maybe you should. We also dont need another city in the desert.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)musing over input from many genuine experts. After all, there are lots of planned-from-scratch communities in the U.S. alone. This is just more planned.
Assuming he gets the project going, and offhand I don't see reason to assume he wouldn't, its workings and dysfunctions will be of interest to researchers in many disciplines. I wish he already knew where it would be.
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)Where is the water for this many people coming from. The Southwest I going dry.
Response to CanonRay (Reply #10)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tree Lady
(11,464 posts)Then I immediately thought where is the water for this 50,000 people town?
And I have been thinking for years we need a bunch of cities but in the small red states of democrats, if green jobs, cafes, good health and culture I think democrats would move there. If we continue to vote by electoral system we need this.
DFW
(54,372 posts)Or will they get someone new for this season?
xmas74
(29,674 posts)Idk if there's much on now.
DFW
(54,372 posts)I saw some episodes of the show dubbed into German here in Düsseldorf.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)Joseph Smiths original settlers had visions of communal living with central planning, and economically theyve (LDS) done quite well. But most of UT is empty, and in many areas like the southeast its gorgeous to boot. It would be interesting to see other groups with similar economic modes of living come in, I mean with similar visions of planned communities. If they ended up leading in sustainable wealth production, that state could be real economic powerhouse, and over decades maybe swing more toward purple.
Bobstandard
(1,305 posts)Water? What about it. Well have it trucked in from Walmart!
And tell me. How does urban development deface something as stark as the desert? Beautiful, to you maybe. To me, its a need waiting to be filled with people! And their needs and wants. Which we can supply through Walmart! And the indestructible world wide supply chain! For we are mighty!
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)Like you see in major urban areas. Idling to stay cool in summer.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)Ruin Lordsburg, New Mexico. Nothing but seedy truck stops and blowing dust and trash. That place could use some intervention. It would be an improvement.
marble falls
(57,081 posts)joetheman
(1,450 posts)onethatcares
(16,168 posts)except for Mr. RichieRich.
Do you think the company grocery store will be a Safeway or that big blue onee?
sounds like resident owned mobile home parks in sunny Floriduh. Now get that pos off our land.
hunter
(38,311 posts)The HOA in this place is going to be hellish.
Any wealthy asshole or con man can develop a city on previously undeveloped desert or wetlands, and many assholes have.
Improving existing cities and high density suburbs without the usual racism disguised as "gentrification" or "redevelopment" is the way to go.
That requires feet-on-the-streets activism, good jobs paying comfortable living wages for everyone who can work, and a strong social safety net for those who are unable to work.
Billionaires are the least likely people to save the world. Most of them are fucking clueless. Too many are fascists.