Against Child Hostages (A message to Joe Manchin)
https://modelcitizen.substack.com/p/against-child-hostages
*snip*
First, the child benefit isnt universal. Wealthier families get nothing. It wouldnt matter much if they were eligible, however. For comfortable families, it would simply amount to a small tax cut. But they dont need a small tax cut. Our country needs a better-financed social insurance system, which means that wealthier households should pitch in more. If you like, you can think of phasing out the child allowance at higher incomes as a way for those households to get the benefit while having their taxes increased by precisely amount of the benefit to help finance the benefit.
Personally, Id prefer real universality it should be a benefit for kids no matter how lucky or unlucky they happened to get in the parent lottery. And then, separately, tax rates at higher brackets should go up by an amount that would wipe out the value of the benefit and then some. As a matter of fiscal accounting, its not important if relatively posh households with kids ever actually receive a child benefit check or ACH transfer. I do think its important politically, though. We value our kids, period, and were in it together. But we cant do this sort of sensible thing because of inane PAYGO and spending cap requirements.
Second, conditioning benefits for kids on their parents working is not required by the principle of reciprocity and is not at the heart of a durable social compact. There are many countries with unconditional child allowances that enjoy social compacts rather more durable than ours.
Cass talk about reciprocity and shared expectations and obligations makes no sense. Its a category error. This is a benefit for children. Its nonsensical to ask recipients to do their part in supporting themselves when maybe the main fact about human children is that they cant support themselves.
*snip*