General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKyle R Trial: DA doing well on this initial attack, IMO
I am hoping he finishes right before lunch and allows the destruction of this whiny teenage killer to sink in while the jury has their lunch break.

Johnny2X2X
(22,611 posts)Ridiculous. Was just talking about KR tailoring his story and the judge admonished him for violating his conctitutional right to remain silent. WTF?
Scottie Mom
(5,815 posts)I practiced law for a long time -- if a defense entails the mind set of the defendant, the DA was well within his rights to ask about intent.
uponit7771
(92,646 posts)... it was his oppinion those statements to Mr Black had no bearing on what KR did.
a kennedy
(33,169 posts)


Amishman
(5,873 posts)The judge started out as unfriendly, and the ADAs didn't exactly help the situation with the prior witnesses. The witness yesterday flat out accusing Binger of trying to coerce him into changing his statement was probably the last straw.
Sympthsical
(10,436 posts)A grave constitutional violation.
Who hired these people?
hlthe2b
(108,891 posts)Sympthsical
(10,436 posts)People need to look outside of the narrative they want.
This was egregious by the prosecution. He violated Prosecutor 101.
hlthe2b
(108,891 posts)Yes, the prosecutor made an error, but that judge had already stacked the deck totally prior to now. He shows his bias toward the defense in nearly everything he does or says.
Sympthsical
(10,436 posts)At least you're conceding the point, I suppose.
I'll take it.
hlthe2b
(108,891 posts)It IS bullshit from a corrupt judge.
Sympthsical
(10,436 posts)Calling a 5th Amendment violation bullshit.
I do not think the interest here is in law and justice.
"Well, I don't like the guy, so violating his core rights at trial isn't that big a problem."
Honestly seems like what you're going for here.
hlthe2b
(108,891 posts)Don't worry, that judge is determined to make sure he walks, so you can feel happy about that. (and it clearly appears that you will).
Kingofalldems
(39,477 posts)Bucky
(55,334 posts)but bear in mind this is a partisan forum, not a forensic debating forum
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Are we all supposed to agree with one another?
Bucky
(55,334 posts)Just remember that there's plenty of folks here who ain't so okay with diversity. If you haven't been called a DINO, a Nader-doop, or a Republican troll (excuse me, I meant to type "Repuke-blow-kkk-on" troll), you haven't had the full DU experience
hlthe2b
(108,891 posts)the prosecution. I guess that is a concept that is difficult for you--for someone to see his actions as a whole, even if he may have called one decision correctly.
manicdem
(519 posts)Most of the attorney blogs and channels are saying the prosecutor screwed the case up with this and many other things.
hlthe2b
(108,891 posts)bears no blame nor deserves no criticism.
Don't worry, though. It is clear that Kyle will be acquitted. I won't be sharing the champagne though. This is a redux of George Zimmerman. May this little shit's life be just as karma-haunted as apparently is Zimmerman's.
manicdem
(519 posts)To be fair, the prosecution has totally screwed the case up. Their witnesses were helping to defend rather than prosecute.
hlthe2b
(108,891 posts)
manicdem
(519 posts)I'm just going to keep posting and you can keep replying.
Johnny2X2X
(22,611 posts)Now he's not allowing questions on what the defendant knows about gun laws.
Scottie Mom
(5,815 posts)He may not be crocked, but he most certainly is a wack job IMO.
Celerity
(48,963 posts)the favour of the white power vigilante. The judge is a fucking POS.
uponit7771
(92,646 posts)... bullets before he broke is gobsmacking
Celerity
(48,963 posts)Every single lawyer I am seeing comment is saying this, especially after the prosecutor went after the judge and told him to stop interrupting him, plus he has now 3 times violated pre trial rulings and has tried to introduce character evidence that is banned under Federal Rule of Evidence Number 404, as well as trying to slip in inferences that violate the little asshole's 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination.
this prosecutor is a clown (so is the judge, so you have a perfect storm of volatility)
the lead counsel for the defence is loving life atm
dsc
(52,849 posts)Celerity
(48,963 posts)person’s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait.
There are some exceptions, but those exceptions are not germane to what the prosecutors was trying to do
Celerity
(48,963 posts)but the federal rules of evidence does things like define hearsay and the like. I would think each state would have its own version of that.
Celerity
(48,963 posts)every single lawyer has been using that phraseology
here is the NC state citation, for instance
https://ncpro.sog.unc.edu/manual/703-3
Celerity
(48,963 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Obvious who the judge sides with.
Celerity
(48,963 posts)that I have seen (over 10 now, all lawyers, prosecutors, or ex judges) is ripping him to shreds as well.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)He even let the court reporter admonish the prosecutor. This is a joke.
a kennedy
(33,169 posts)multireeds
(56 posts)tissue box dude is provided by the court
Johnny2X2X
(22,611 posts)He thinks it's the greatest thing, you can tell. He killed 2 liberals and the only thing he's sorry about is that it wasn't more.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Johnny2X2X
(22,611 posts)Can't even talk about Rittenhouse pointing his gun at people.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Poor widdle boy is looking like a victim.
UTUSN
(73,676 posts)rockfordfile
(8,732 posts)The media called him on his bs and he reacted like a guilty judge.