HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Here we go, judge is piss...

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:07 PM

Here we go, judge is pissed . . .

This'll be interesting.

Edit: The prosecution was explaining why the Zaminsky's weren't on the stand, asserting they had a 5th Amendment privilege. However, it is untrue for the wife.

But when it came up, the judge looked furious. They argued a bit, the judge thought about it, and found a solution.

If he'd let the two sides to get into it, it would've allowed the possibility of giving the defense a rebuttal. The judge found a way to avoid it.

14 replies, 2547 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 14 replies Author Time Post
Reply Here we go, judge is pissed . . . (Original post)
Sympthsical Nov 2021 OP
Heartstrings Nov 2021 #1
Tomconroy Nov 2021 #2
Sympthsical Nov 2021 #4
Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #7
Sympthsical Nov 2021 #9
Amishman Nov 2021 #11
Beaverhausen Nov 2021 #3
sheshe2 Nov 2021 #5
48656c6c6f20 Nov 2021 #6
BlackSkimmer Nov 2021 #8
Walleye Nov 2021 #10
Bev54 Nov 2021 #12
Sympthsical Nov 2021 #13
Bev54 Nov 2021 #14

Response to Sympthsical (Original post)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:09 PM

1. Oh ffs!

Heís exhaustingÖ..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Original post)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:11 PM

2. What happened?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tomconroy (Reply #2)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:14 PM

4. Prosecutor started messing with the 5th Amendment again

He's trying to say the Zaminsky's weren't testifying because of their 5th Amendment right. It's not true for the wife.

Honestly, I'm trying to figure out what they're hashing out. But that's the claim at issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Reply #4)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:17 PM

7. Disaster averted, it looks like.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dr. Strange (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:21 PM

9. Yeah, judge found an exit

He doesn't want a clusterfark at this late stage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Reply #9)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 08:06 PM

11. Honestly pretty generous of him

The prosecution repeatedly making significant and bizarre slips relating to the 5th is pretty severe. The judge could have come down a lot harder.

I suspect that if we do manage to get guilty on a few charges, quite a bit will be made of it on appeal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Original post)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:13 PM

3. yeah what happened? We aren't all watching

thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Original post)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:14 PM

5. Some details perhaps?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Original post)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:14 PM

6. I can't see your radio broadcast.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Original post)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:18 PM

8. I hate this judge.

One good thing is that when these prosecutors have been speaking - itís the first time Iíve seen the murdering little punk look uncomfortable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlackSkimmer (Reply #8)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 07:26 PM

10. He looked like this was the first time he had actually sat and thought about what he did

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Original post)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 08:23 PM

12. The defense attorney is at fault here, saying the prosecution could have called them

but did not. The prosecution was explaining the jury why not and defense jumps up and says it is not in evidence. He really is a pompous ass, turned me right off this entire trial. Calling prosecutors liars when it really is he and his client that is the liars. What a stupid way to conduct yourself during a trial. I understand theatrics but he is totally disrespectful, which would not be allowed in a court room in Canada.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bev54 (Reply #12)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 08:26 PM

13. My ultimate understanding of the resolution

Is that either side could have called the wife but did not, but the husband was off limits because of the 5th Amendment.

That was what I came away with, but I could be wrong.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sympthsical (Reply #13)

Mon Nov 15, 2021, 08:31 PM

14. Well they could have and that was decided by the judge

but the defense is the one claiming in their summation that the prosecution could have called them, knowing that Mr. could plead the 5th but failed to say that. When the prosecutor rebutted that he stood up to say it was not in evidence. Shit man you brought it up!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread