General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCops were in pursuit of 13 yr old on dirt bike. He crashed and died
https://www.newser.com/story/314986/family-of-teen-killed-on-dirt-bike-wants-answers-from-fla-cops.htmlItsjustMe
(11,253 posts)Deuxcents
(16,354 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,463 posts)LisaM
(27,843 posts)The kid is not old enough to be driving on the street, but is filling up on gas and then (by all appearances from this short clip) illegally takes a dirt bike onto a street with traffic and pedestrian crossings and starts driving too fast and (maybe) does a U-turn and looks as if he's driving with complete disregard for anyone else. The police are chasing him, but it appears that they have some justification (it's only a few weeks since the police took heat for NOT apprehending a driver in Wisconsin who drove onto the sidewalk). Were the police supposed to just watch while an underage driver zoomed around in a reckless manner where he was bound to hurt someone?
I need more information. Why on earth is a 13-year old just driving around on the street and what should the police have done? They didn't seem particularly aggressive pulling out of the gas station, but clearly they needed to stop him.
Maybe there is more to it, but the police seem justified in trying to get him off the road.
Sympthsical
(9,132 posts)On the gas station video, he leaves to the left, then comes back going the wrong way in the far lane. Then it seems like he ran a red light to make a left turn. You can't see the lights, but the traffic perpendicular to him when he enters the intersection is just cruising through it, and the police slow as they approach the intersection to pursue.
So, I think maybe there was cause for the police to pull him over. Certainly by that point in the pursuit, he was breaking laws and being reckless.
I'm sure we'll get more info and dash cam. But based on the short gas station video, a run red light and going the wrong way would be justifications for me.
The question is, "How did this start? What prompted this?" Because by the time the video below begins, it seems like the police were already after him.
Link to tweet
It's very tragic he died. But I don't think summoning for pitchforks without facts being provided is responsible.
LisaM
(27,843 posts)I just don't see that we have all the information we need but the situation seemed dangerous without interference.
They could have been going after him for not being old enough to drive. And I have no idea if dirt bikes are allowed on the street, either.
On edit - it appears that they may not be street legal, according to an article I found. Here's a snip.
https://www.dirtrider.com/state-laws-for-dirt-bikes/
Sympthsical
(9,132 posts)I don't know anything about dirt bikes or what Florida laws are. So, I don't know if what he was driving was street legal.
If his dirt bike is not street legal, I mean that's pretty much cause enough right there. He glanced to his right, saw the police coming at him, and took off.
I think it's weird that none of the news articles I've read say - and I did look for it.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)SYFROYH
(34,185 posts)Hopefully the investigation will reveal more about any police culpability.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)I am against police stops for traffic violations when it can be done by mail except in cases of this level of recklessness.
MichMan
(11,998 posts)I understand your point, but that would mean anyone driving without plates couldn't be stopped for traffic violations.
XanaDUer2
(10,772 posts)SYFROYH
(34,185 posts)I have to credit WhiskeyGrinder for making me look this up. It does appear that the BBPD has a very high standard for vehicular pursuit which the 13-year motorcyclist didn't trigger.
I'm all for not pursuing over paperwork like an expired tag or minor violations like a busted taillight, but a minor driving on the road is a danger to self and others. I don't know how any moving traffic stop could happen if this is the only relevant policy.
Still, the BBPD appears to have overstepped with this pursuit according to their policy.
III. PURSUIT POLICY
The decision to initiate pursuit must be based on the pursuing officers conclusion that the immediate danger to the officer and the public created by the pursuit is less than the immediate or potential danger to the public Boynton Beach Police Department should the suspect remain at large. The pursuit must be conducted in a non-reckless manner with emphasis on the safety of the public, human rights and the property of others.
Vehicular pursuits will be initiated only if the officer reasonably believes that the person(s) fleeing has committed a forcible felony defined as:
1. Murder (as defined in FS 782);
2. Manslaughter (as defined in FS 782);
3. Sexual Battery (as defined in FS 794);
4. Carjacking (as defined in FS 812);
5. Home Invasion Robbery (as defined in FS 812);
6. Robbery (as defined in FS 812);
7. Arson (as defined in FS 806);
8. Kidnapping (as defined in FS 787);
9. Serious Aggravated Assault/Battery (as defined in FS 784); and/or
10. Discharging of a Destructive Device or Bomb (as defined in FS 790).
Any pursuit must be conducted in accordance with this directive and only those officers who have received instructional training in the high-speed pursuit policy will engage in a vehicular pursuit.
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Seems like they were just following him as he flew in and out of traffic.
SYFROYH
(34,185 posts)From the definitions section:
Vehicle Pursuit: An active and continuing effort by an officer in an authorized emergency vehicle to apprehend the occupant(s) of a moving vehicle, provided the driver of such vehicle who is or should be aware of the attempt being made, increases his/her speed, takes other evasive actions, or refuses to stop in an attempt to avoid apprehension.
There isn't a definition for high-speed pursuit in this policy.