General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat would a jury trial for Donald J Trump look like?
Would they be sequestered?
Would both sides be ordered to not talk to the press?
Would it be possible to get Trump voters, not necessarily Trump supporters, on the jury? Could they render a fair judgement if they were not part of the "cult"?
Could they order Trump to be silent during his trial?
It's hard to imagine.
Turbineguy
(37,415 posts)Moostache
(9,897 posts)Imagine OJ trial on steroids and Fox News hosts on oxygen 24/7 to counter their hyperventilating.
MyOwnPeace
(16,955 posts)You certainly have identified 'issues' regarding it all!
Tree Lady
(11,536 posts)I think his hard core wackos would go even more nuts.
intrepidity
(7,367 posts)to find a dozen+ people who would actually be fit to serve on such a trial?
I can't even imagine. Main reason I can't imagine him *ever* getting the justice he deserves.
Walleye
(31,150 posts)634-5789
(4,175 posts)Poiuyt
(18,134 posts)Wink, wink
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)But you cant bump people for being a Republican because they may be pro Trump, cause then Democrats could be bumped for being against him.
A non biased jury pool would have to be picked from the indigenous tribes of the jungle.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)...between someone that voted for Trump and someone that was part of the MAGA cult. A Trump voter would not be automatically disqualified.
bucolic_frolic
(43,495 posts)Would a Military Tribunal be appropriate? I have no idea. Floated as a trial balloon. Because a civilian jury could be impossible to find neutral either way, and how would you identify any bias since everyone's harboring an opinion?
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)I think the courtroom would be in Guantánamo. So sunny and beachy?
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)kentuck
(111,111 posts)...it would still be the topic of conversations all across America. It would create discussions that had never been discussed before.
People would re-evaluate the meaning of justice and who was above the law?
Over-all, even if found not guilty, it would be a very useful exercise, in my humble opinion.
Irish_Dem
(47,947 posts)A jury trial would be a joke given the number of Magats who would sit on the jury.
keithbvadu2
(37,044 posts)Pervs
liars
Mammon worshiping Christians
Republican family values Jerry Falwell Jr
Lindsey G after the golf game
Vlad
Rocketman
MBS
Donnie Jr
Eric
Javanka
Stormy? - juror excused
Melania? - juror excused - undependable emotions
We the jury find the defendant DJT not guilty by reason of total jury nullification.
Beastly Boy
(9,575 posts)I can't even imagine that.
texasfiddler
(1,993 posts)[link:|
soryang
(3,299 posts)no matter what jurors said during voir dire, some who supported trump would claim they didn't, and that they could be objective in evaluating the evidence in court. At least one would get through the jury selection process and keep the jury from reaching a verdict and result in a mistrial.
Blue Owl
(50,578 posts)Poiuyt
(18,134 posts)kentuck
(111,111 posts)...in my opinion.
Because it would force Americans to confront the issue. What type of justice do we have in this country and do we still have a Constitution?