Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
3. What do you mean we haven't heard anything?
Tue Jan 4, 2022, 08:10 PM
Jan 2022

I’ve read several articles in the last week about the situation. What information are you looking for, specifically?

question everything

(47,479 posts)
7. The kind that is linked in the above reply
Tue Jan 4, 2022, 08:15 PM
Jan 2022

I was not specifically looking for these news but nothing in the two print papers that I get everyday nor network news, nor on DU.

DBoon

(22,366 posts)
4. "Logistics Management" has this
Tue Jan 4, 2022, 08:12 PM
Jan 2022
The aforementioned import dwell fee, which POLA and neighboring Port of Long Beach (POLB), whom collectively account for roughly 40% of total U.S. imports, was rolled out on October 25, but the fee has since subsequently delayed, as POLA has seen a 53% reduction in import containers dwelling for more than nine days going back to October 24.

What’s more, POLA and POLB said yesterday that they will each delay consideration of the “Container Dwell Fee” until January 10, adding that going back to October 25, the ports have seen a combined decline of 35% in aging cargo on the docks, with year-end holidays slowing the progress compared to previous weeks, as was anticipated.


https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/port_of_los_angeles_considers_fee_for_lingering_empty_containers

My bolding

dalton99a

(81,486 posts)
5. Southern California's Container-Ship Backlog Moves Farther Out to Sea
Tue Jan 4, 2022, 08:13 PM
Jan 2022
https://www.wsj.com/articles/southern-californias-container-ship-backlog-moves-farther-out-to-sea-11639132381

Southern California’s Container-Ship Backlog Moves Farther Out to Sea

The backup of container ships waiting to enter the nation’s busiest port complex isn’t letting up. But it has moved farther from shore.

Only about 30 vessels sat within sight of the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach this week, waiting for berths at a gateway that has come to symbolize U.S. supply-chain bottlenecks. More than 60 others destined for the port complex remained in waters farther out to sea, some hundreds or even thousands of miles away, including ships that reduced speed during their voyage from Asia to delay their arrival.

The system has hidden from view a big part of the armada of cargo ships waiting to unload. But the backup at the biggest gateway for U.S. container imports remains as large as ever, with the lineup of vessels now stretching across the Pacific, signaling that big volumes of cargo are still heading for port terminals, warehouses and transportation networks that have been swamped by the imports.

Jim McKenna, chief executive of the Pacific Maritime Association, which represents West Coast terminal operators in labor negotiations, said some ships now take 22 to 24 days to complete a voyage from Asia that used to take 10 to 14 days.

ShazamIam

(2,571 posts)
10. They couldn't blame it on Biden so dropped it from the news since that would be anti-corporate.
Tue Jan 4, 2022, 08:30 PM
Jan 2022

The ships are still piling up. Production, distribution and retailing are all controlled by for profit corporations, not the government.

https://www.westernoverseas.com/port-congestion-update-1-3-22/

doc03

(35,337 posts)
13. We were not supposed to have Christmas and President Biden was to blame
Tue Jan 4, 2022, 10:02 PM
Jan 2022

but we had Christmas so the media dropped it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We have not heard about t...