General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMerrick Garland Made a Lethally Important Point About His January 6 Investigation
Merrick Garland Made a Lethally Important Point About His January 6 Investigation
His speech on Wednesday did everything it was supposed to do.
By Charles P. Pierce
Jan 5, 2022
There will be a general disappointment in some quarters that Attorney General Merrick Garland did not arrive for his speech on Wednesday with a chain of human heads behind him. This, I think, mistakes what the speech was really about.
First, it was a memorial of the first anniversary of the attempted overthrow of the 2020 presidential election. As such, there were elegiac elements to the address that were wholly appropriate. Second, nobody ever is going to mistake Merrick Garland for William Jennings Bryan. He burns no barns. He busts no blocks. He rouses no rabble. But its more than a little unfair to judge what he said Tuesday by either of those standards. He said a lot more than hes usually given credit for saying....
More pointedly, Garland cited the Watergate investigation in defense of the pace and mechanics of the Justice Departments investigation. This is a lethally important point. There was a long period of time in which it seemed as though the actual investigation would never get past the White House gates. For example, back in 1974, there was tremendous impatience among the Democratic majority in the House of Representatives at how slowly they perceived the Judiciary Committees impeachment inquiry was moving. Yet, one day, committee counsel John Doar showed up with a binder containing his statement of the case against Richard Nixon, and the fight was over at that moment. It was thinking about John Doar that reminded me that Merrick Garland convicted both of the Oklahoma City bombers after an investigation that did not leak a drop.
It was a good speech that did everything it was supposed to do. It paid proper respect to the dead and wounded of January 6, 2021. It linked what the DOJ is doing now to the DOJs original purposewhich was to protect the lives, rights, and the franchise of newly freed Black citizens in the South in the years after the Civil War. In doing that, he tied the insurrection itself not only to the actions of the previous administration*, but also to the voter-suppression campaigns by Republican politicians that preceded January 6, but which has accelerated in the days since. He even cited John Doars work for Attorney General Robert Kennedy in working for voting rights in 1961.
It was a big circle, and Garland drew it perfectly.
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a38678418/merrick-garland-jan-6-investigation-speech/
Tree Lady
(11,457 posts)Were on tv, my father yelled and screamed at most of it as he watched every night after work.
Believe me people did think it was going very slow and I even remember thinking Nixon is going to get away with it. But one by one the dominoes came down getting more and more important people closer and closer to Nixon.
Do we have proof yet some type of deal was made quit step down and we won't arrest you to Nixon?
Walleye
(31,017 posts)Poiuyt
(18,123 posts)used to have some honor. They don't now.
BTW, my recollections of Watergate were the same as yours. I was in college at the time (at the same school as Richard Kleindienst's children).
DeeDeeNY
(3,355 posts)The Republican Party back then had some honor.
Marcuse
(7,479 posts)Aviation Pro
(12,164 posts)Andropov was during Reagan's era.
Marcuse
(7,479 posts)Poiuyt
(18,123 posts)He did sign some important agreements with them, but there's no way he would have been a puppet like Trump was.
lastlib
(23,224 posts)He hunted them all his life;
The only one he didn't catch
Was married to his wife."
Old poem I remember from the Watergate days. Yeah, it's a stretch, but, forget it, I'm rollin'.......
choie
(4,111 posts)when people respected subpoenas and even AGs had to testify and handover documents. Plus, seems there are no John Deans anymore.
DENVERPOPS
(8,817 posts)that they made a deal. At times he could go off record and start blabbering about things. I thought that they made him a deal to resign, and tucked him away in SanClemente? So he would be off the grid. That way if he started blabbering about national security etc there would be no media around to hear him, just his secret service agents.....
And yes, he had secret service agents after he left office. One day, we were surfing and we got too close to his home's beachfront and were quickly chased away.
LiberalFighter
(50,912 posts)I think part of the key nail was the hearing being public.
underpants
(182,788 posts)PSPS
(13,594 posts)ShazamIam
(2,570 posts)the continuing investigation.
Thanks Mr. Pierce
Grasswire2
(13,569 posts)mcar
(42,307 posts)Beastly Boy
(9,323 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)It encourages people to speak first and think later. We'd be better off without it.
Caliman73
(11,736 posts)Emotions cloud rational thinking. They are prone to encourage us to follow impulsive ideas or they do not allow us to step back and take a more critical view into a situation.
Emotions are good for immediate action. We are more likely to storm the ramparts when we are emotionally activated, but emotions can be easily manipulated so you do not want your initial emotional response to be your only and last word on a subject.
Link to tweet
?s=20
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)are known to be financing the disruption across the nation by domestic extremists, overwhelmingly conservative but including radicalized citizens of all types, as everyone from the National Educational Association to...Vox report. I don't think anyone can doubt they are allied with the coup plotters. Creating civil unrest and seizure of local institutions are standard coup techniques.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)exposure, despite the dark money security preps, may be exposed.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)But I should think we should expect the agents of top-level traitors to be professionals who maintained legal distance, for themselves and more so for their employers.
And of course there's the new "grassroots" method of funding everything. Claim even phony associations with popular anti-establishment causes or names and rake in hundreds of thousands in short order. Following that money would lead them to every political social media site on the web, and good luck finding one who had any idea what the money was being used for.
Still. I wouldn't want them following me.
Cha
(297,195 posts)crickets
(25,969 posts)Response to mcar (Original post)
Post removed
Joinfortmill
(14,417 posts)TickTock.
gab13by13
(21,323 posts)he did not tell us he was investigating the people who planned the coup, yet.
His speech was a request for more time.
We shall see what happens with Mark Meadows criminal referral.
Joinfortmill
(14,417 posts)gab13by13
(21,323 posts)that Sheldon Whitehouse heard. Whitehouse said that Garland is going after the pawns and even though there is evidence out there to investigate several of the coup planners it isn't being done. That's what Sheldon Whitehouse just said.
was everything in this speech. I applaud every word in his speech.
Hekate
(90,674 posts)ShazzieB
(16,389 posts)Merrick Garland: "The actions we have taken thus far will not be our last. The Justice Department remains committed to holding all January 6 perpetrators -- at any level -- accountable under law, whether they were present that day, or were otherwise criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy. We will follow the facts wherever they lead."
Please note this wording: "We remain committed to holding all January 6 perpetrators -- at any level -- accountable under law."
That is a strong statement, imo. With that in mind, "We will follow the facts where they lead" is also a strong statement. That is not an amorphous future promise, but a statement of what they are already doing and will continue to do going forward.
It would have been nice if he'd said, "We will continue to follow the facts where they lead," but I have no doubt that's what he meant.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.
burrowowl
(17,640 posts)Reflects my take on Garland's speech.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)dem4decades
(11,288 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... else close to what a judge says about being quiet.
The number of MAGA involved would no doubt be more than 20 and they'd leak to the high hills if they were being directly engaged by the alphabet crew.
RobinA
(9,888 posts)when I see it. Nothing against Garland, Im just way past thinking those people will ever get taken down. And Im hoping against hope that some people will one day wish to hell Garland was safely tucked away on the Supreme Court.
DENVERPOPS
(8,817 posts)Hillary had been elected so that Trump and Republican's couldn't have stacked the court with not one, but three hard core Republicans.
Making sure that the court didn't just LEAN right, but was solid right by several votes........
Do you remember that Gorsuch's mom was a hard right political appointee, heading I think the EPA??. After a couple years of doing everything the Repubs wanted, she was almost convicted for corruption, and dodged it by resigning quickly before she would have been prosecuted and found guilty........
Fine family...............
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)dem4decades
(11,288 posts)FBI?
They're admitting their crimes on TV and still nothing.
gab13by13
(21,323 posts)Garland said he will follow the facts even if the facts lead to upper level people. There are facts out there now that implicate upper level people.
Whitehouse also said that arresting people for trespassing isn't going to cut it.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)I would add one more thing. In addition to honoring the capital police et al, he gave a strong stark description of what they and the legislators faced that day. Over the last year, I suspect the reason some Republicans have basically said it is not important to look back at it and they have minimized the danger.
Hekate
(90,674 posts)As always, hats off to Charlie Pierce.
dem4decades
(11,288 posts)gab13by13
(21,323 posts)blew up a day care center full of kids, everybody was against him.
Mustellus
(328 posts)Weekly emails to me from the Secretary of Defense, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force.. the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs... First Sargent of the Air Force....
I had no idea I was on their mailing lists.
Monthly "Leadership" talks from the local commanding officers.
The message was always the same: Our oath was to "Preserve, Protect, and Defend the Constitution of the United States". Not any one person... not any party. But the system. Again and again and again.
And it appears to have (mostly) worked.
I think that's what Garland was doing with his DoJ. Telling them that the Rule of Law still holds. Telling the R's inside the department exactly where their loyalties need to lie. It wasn't so much a speech for us.. it was a 'Leadership' talk to his troops. No one gets off by political party.
Yes, no heads on a platter yet. But I recognized that speech.
mcar
(42,307 posts)Hekate
(90,674 posts)PurgedVoter
(2,217 posts)Cha
(297,195 posts)for your on the ground report.. and TY for your Service!
dlk
(11,561 posts)There was no mistaking his resolve.
Cha
(297,195 posts)are mistaking it.
dlk
(11,561 posts)Mueller was a Republican appointed by Republicans. I believe Garland is different. There was no mistaking his resolve in the speech
stollen
(419 posts)for the first mention of Watergate in the San Francisco Herald Tribune. It was on the back page of the news section, about 2 inches long.
So at least we have a head-start on Coup-gate as far as the media is concerned.
gab13by13
(21,323 posts)the leaks wouldn't come from DOJ, they would come from the people being investigated, they would be claiming executive privilege and all kinds of delay tactics.
Today is 3 weeks since DOJ received Mark Meadow's criminal referral and it is just for ignoring a subpoena. It took DOJ 3 weeks to indict Bannon.
Want to start a pool when the indictment comes?
Cha
(297,195 posts)has to say.
I don't pay any attention whatsoever to any pundits.. on tv or online.
Mahalo, mcar!
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,176 posts)malaise
(268,968 posts)Rec
Goodheart
(5,321 posts)Lethal to whom? Lethal to what?
soldierant
(6,857 posts)except me and Noah Kim at Mother Jones. Garland did not connect the dots, but Noah and I got something like this out of it:
We could lock up everyone involved, from Trump** down tomorrow, and it would not save out democracy.
The only think that will save our democracy is winning the elections in 2022 and 2024.
That's why he went on so aout voting rights. Protecting the people's voice at the ballot box is, just now, even more important, and even more urgent, than getting accountability.
Noah didn't exactly say all that, but he did, s I did, focus on the voting rights prts of the speech.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)traitortrump has long yearned for, direct targets he can fight - instead of the diligently cumulative evidence/case building work, that has been eroding trump support, . . . for a full year . . . with much more to come.
soldierant
(6,857 posts)but so are the voter rolls.
It doesn't matter how much how many people hate Trump** and Trumpism if their votes do not get counted.