Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats quietly explore barring Trump from office over Jan. 6
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/588489-democrats-quietly-explore-barring-trump-from-office-over-jan-6Democrats quietly explore barring Trump from office over Jan. 6
By John Kruzel - 01/06/22 06:01 AM EST
...
Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified after the Civil War, says that officeholders who "have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same" are disqualified from future office.
Raskin, a former constitutional law professor, served as a House manager during Trumps impeachment trial over his role in the Jan. 6 attack. Days after Trump's acquittal in the Senate, Raskin discussed the constitutional provision in a press interview, saying Trump was right in the bullseye middle of that group."
"The point is that the constitutional purpose is clear, to keep people exactly like Donald Trump and other traitors to the union from holding public office," he told ABC News on Feb. 17, adding that the legal mechanics would require "more research."
Most constitutional scholars who spoke to The Hill think the provision is not self-executing. In practical terms, that means applying Section 3 to Trump would require an additional step by lawmakers to make the 14th Amendment operative.
Some scholars believe that Congress, by a simple majority in both chambers, could act on its own to find Trump engaged in insurrection, which would implicate the constitutional provision. Under the 14th Amendment, restoring Trumps eligibility would then require a supermajority vote.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 887 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats quietly explore barring Trump from office over Jan. 6 (Original Post)
dalton99a
Jan 2022
OP
mopinko
(70,099 posts)1. do that and take the wind out of the sails of these traitors.
neuter him.
Bayard
(22,064 posts)2. Disqualified from future office
Best be taking this action right quickly, if it takes a majority in both Houses.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)3. Boy that would be a chocolate sunday with nuts on top...
TFGs nuts.
helpisontheway
(5,007 posts)4. Why are they waiting if we need control of House/Senate
We are very likely to lose midterms. Are they just leaking this but plan to kick the ball down the road? Are they gonna suggest it once they are no longer in charge? Or would the two so called Democrats refuse to block him from running. Manchins constituents love Trump. 🙄
CousinIT
(9,241 posts)5. INSURRECTIONS should have consequences. n/t
DeeNice
(575 posts)6. that hashtag needs to trend
#InsurrectionsHaveConsequences
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)7. This is something that MUST be done!
I've been shocked for the past year that it hasn't happened. He shouldn't be allowed to be dog-catcher. Nothing.