General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsand another damn thing that the orange piece of shit did......GOT THREE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES APPROVED.
THREE!!!!! 🤬 🤬 🤬 I keep just trying get over the last damn six years four of the orange piece of shit, and two, going on three years of the gawd damn Covid. Im just not going to make it. Im not.
dchill
(38,547 posts)A pretty good trick.
bamagal62
(3,270 posts)Were screwed.
BluesRunTheGame
(1,621 posts)JohnSJ
(92,422 posts)voting, or voting for Jill Stein, and encouraging others to do likewise, bear a large part of the responsibility for that
In every critical swing states Hillary lost by less than 1%. In those critical swing states, Jill Stein received 1% of the vote.
It did make a difference
bamagal62
(3,270 posts)The money on Jill Stein?
sheshe2
(83,933 posts)JohnSJ
(92,422 posts)FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)FlyingPiggy
(3,384 posts)Have just laid down the law and appointed Merrick.
FBaggins
(26,760 posts)The constitution doesnt vest advice and consent with the president and any senators in his party
tritsofme
(17,403 posts)Suggestions otherwise are just misinformation.
In It to Win It
(8,286 posts)FlyingPiggy
(3,384 posts)One of the things dems do well is not do anything. Or just brings a knife to a gunfight.
onenote
(42,769 posts)Not sure what you're saying, although it sounds a lot like "Presidents should get to lay down the law" notwithstanding the Constitution.
tritsofme
(17,403 posts)Democrats only had 46. How are you at math?
FlyingPiggy
(3,384 posts)Of the terms of engagement. We are often more worried about what it will look like and do nothing. Not even to protest. Just accept everything as a defeat bc we dont have the numbers. Were pretty good at that. It may be futile, but at least try and pretend to fight. We never put pressure on them to do the right thing when they are in the majority. But, I get it. This is the Democratic party and we just need to shut up and rah rah rah and do more of nothing. All is good .
tritsofme
(17,403 posts)But President Obama and Senate Democrats were consistently loud in demanding a vote for Garland.
Trying to make anyone the villain in that story besides Mitch McConnell is blatantly dishonest.
Polybius
(15,497 posts)The Senate was majority Republican in 2016.
FlyingPiggy
(3,384 posts)Instead of accepting defeat at first sign of anything.
Hekate
(90,836 posts)NowISeetheLight
(3,943 posts)Trump is an incompetent idiot and egomaniac but McConnell is like the man behind the curtain. He completely politicized the court with the Garland episode. All he cares about is power.
littlemissmartypants
(22,822 posts)patphil
(6,217 posts)I'm sure Trump was given the names he should nominate. But, ultimately, a lot of conservative Republicans worked to get this job done.
I'm not absolving him, but it should be remembered that the Trump Supreme Court, which will be with us for decades, was a collaborative effort.
And that's a terrifying thought!
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,619 posts)Control of the SCOTUS and the future of Roe was on the ballot in 2016
DFW
(54,445 posts)He would have nominated three of his kids without proper guidance
Seeing as how the Republican-dominated Senate would have confirmed a cucumber, a radish and a garden slug, as long as a Republican president nominated them, it was not a matter of getting them confirmed. The fact that Opus Dei had a big say in who was nominated mattered far more than whether or not Trump had any input, which I am quite confident he did not.
a kennedy
(29,711 posts)ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)can we just stop paying attention to that ass?
If we never spoke of him again I would be a happy camper.