Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,956 posts)
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 08:59 PM Jan 2022

GOP senator plans to introduce 'Fauci Act' after clash at hearing

Republican Sen. Roger Marshall (Kan.) plans to introduce the "Fauci Act" after he clashed with infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci at a Senate hearing this week.

Marshall will be introducing the Financial Accountability for Uniquely Compensated Individuals (FAUCI) Act after he said Fauci's records were not readily accessible to the public, a spokesperson for the senator told The Hill.

The Fauci Act would require the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) website to provide the financial records of administration officials like Fauci and a list of those in the government whose financial records are not public.

The move comes after Fauci was caught on a hot mic calling Marshall a "moron" for not knowing the Chief White House medical adviser's financial records were public.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gop-senator-plans-to-introduce-fauci-act-after-clash-at-hearing/ar-AASL7Fc

Aww did he hurt your feewings Marshall?

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP senator plans to introduce 'Fauci Act' after clash at hearing (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2022 OP
What person in their right mind would go into public service today? Irish_Dem Jan 2022 #1
It's sounds like a "good government" bill. If I were Fauci, I'd endorse it publicly. zaj Jan 2022 #2
Excellent! ymetca Jan 2022 #4
Why would they? It's putting limits on government, not corporations. zaj Jan 2022 #5
Financial disclosures can have a lot of Personally identifiable Information. NutmegYankee Jan 2022 #14
I'm sure there is an existing process that can be applied zaj Jan 2022 #18
I am so weary of these assholes. madaboutharry Jan 2022 #3
Thanks for posting. We need as much information as possible. Of course...Marshall is a "TRUE MORON" Stuart G Jan 2022 #6
Fauci bdamomma Jan 2022 #7
Methinks he should reconsider that move... Wounded Bear Jan 2022 #8
Or get someone who can use the google machine. mackdaddy Jan 2022 #9
Political Stunt BlueIdaho Jan 2022 #10
It's an old, old act: "And I have introduced legislation in the House to stop this!" whatever.... CTyankee Jan 2022 #15
Exactly! BlueIdaho Jan 2022 #19
He's a very snowy flake. Nt Baked Potato Jan 2022 #11
This GOP senator is an idiot LetMyPeopleVote Jan 2022 #12
As the book is titled "What's the matter with Kansas?" Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2022 #13
because he's one of them and they are ignorant. CTyankee Jan 2022 #16
Still pretending he has a gotcha, so sad. . what a moron Emile Jan 2022 #17
And so many of his cynical repuke party know it, but he's THEIR moron so they don't much care. CTyankee Jan 2022 #20
 

zaj

(3,433 posts)
2. It's sounds like a "good government" bill. If I were Fauci, I'd endorse it publicly.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 09:03 PM
Jan 2022

Suggested Fauci Quote:
"Sounds like a great idea, more government transparency is better."

Optional Fauci Quote:
"Anything that helps morons like Marshall get their facts straight is good with me!"

ymetca

(1,182 posts)
4. Excellent!
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 09:20 PM
Jan 2022

Call his bluff.

Of course the bill is going nowhere, since he hasn't apparently consulted yet with his corporate masters, who will promptly tell him to sit down and shut up.

 

zaj

(3,433 posts)
5. Why would they? It's putting limits on government, not corporations.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 09:25 PM
Jan 2022

It's a stunt to name it FAUCI, but it's a decent bill that seems like many can get behind. If I were Kyrsten Sinema, or some other moderate Dem looking for some attention, I'd draft an identical bill without the attack on Fauci, and then move it forward. I imagine it would get bi-partisan support.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
14. Financial disclosures can have a lot of Personally identifiable Information.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 10:47 PM
Jan 2022

There can be account numbers and other data that is illegal to release to the public. I urge some thought on this first. Most reports require some redaction for this reason.

There are also those who fill out a confidential financial disclosure (OGE450), such as members of the DOD. Passing out that information outside of the government serves only to help adversaries figure out targets for espionage.

 

zaj

(3,433 posts)
18. I'm sure there is an existing process that can be applied
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:52 PM
Jan 2022

...for this sort of care.

It's a good request and I imagine a decent, bi-partisan bill will take these things into account.

madaboutharry

(40,209 posts)
3. I am so weary of these assholes.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 09:04 PM
Jan 2022

It is like all the dumbasses we remember from high school are republican senators and congresspeople.

Stuart G

(38,421 posts)
6. Thanks for posting. We need as much information as possible. Of course...Marshall is a "TRUE MORON"
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 09:26 PM
Jan 2022

...Apologies to all ...FAKE MORONS ....This fellow takes the cake.. ... ...

Wounded Bear

(58,648 posts)
8. Methinks he should reconsider that move...
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 09:35 PM
Jan 2022

I think there are a LOT of gov't appointees that would not like that.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
15. It's an old, old act: "And I have introduced legislation in the House to stop this!" whatever....
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 10:48 PM
Jan 2022

they do it all the time, knowing goddamn well that it'll never go anywhere...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP senator plans to intr...