Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:06 PM Jan 2022

Ex-FBI Strzok: Concerning Ginni Thomas wrote 1/6 participants 'have done nothing wrong.'

Tea Partier.



Former Top FBI Official: ‘Concerning’ Ginni Thomas Signed Letter Saying Jan. 6 Participants ‘Have Done Nothing Wrong’

by David Badash
New Civil Rights Movement, January 18, 2022

A former top FBI official who served as Chief of the Bureau’s Counterespionage Section and led the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election says it’s “concerning” that Ginni Thomas signed a letter attacking the House January 6 Select Committee.

Peter Strzok, who also led the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server and for a short time served on the Mueller Investigation, responded to Tuesday’s social media eruption over the resurfaced letter signed by Thomas, a far right wing conspiracy theorist and lobbyist who happens to be married to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

That letter calls for U.S. Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger to be expelled from the House Republican conference, which would also involve stripping them of their committee assignments.

Strzok was more focused on the current makeup of the Supreme Court, and other points of the letter which was signed in December by Thomas and more than 60 other mostly far right wing conservatives – making it a veritable who’s who of well-known extreme conservative activists including the head of an anti-LGBTQ hate group.

“Which is more concerning: That the spouse of a SC Justice recently signed a letter calling the Jan 6 Cmttee ‘an overtly partisan political persecution that brings disrespect to our country’s rule of law [and] legal harassment to private citizens who have done nothing wrong’ Or,” Strzok wrote, “The fact that the former President who encouraged those ‘private citizens who have done nothing wrong’ to violently oppose the peaceful transfer of power appointed three of nine Justices to the Supreme Court?”

Continues…

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2022/01/former-top-fbi-official-concerning-ginni-thomas-signed-letter-saying-jan-6-participants-have-done-nothing-wrong/

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ex-FBI Strzok: Concerning Ginni Thomas wrote 1/6 participants 'have done nothing wrong.' (Original Post) Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 OP
Does "done nothing wrong" include... dchill Jan 2022 #1
I believe that was disproven AZSkiffyGeek Jan 2022 #3
I withdraw the specific claim, but agree with her eyeballs! dchill Jan 2022 #7
That story fell off Corporate McPravda's radar PDQ. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #4
Maybe her husband ought to get one too. fwvinson Jan 2022 #16
Maybe he shouldn't get a subpoena..... SergeStorms Jan 2022 #24
AND, a cushy life-time position where you don't really EVER have to speak... FailureToCommunicate Jan 2022 #38
I've heard that it's the hit dog that yelps,... Volaris Jan 2022 #39
she was also wrong to marry a rapist , so there's that. How low can she go? Kittycatkat Jan 2022 #50
How about "backing insurrection low." dchill Jan 2022 #51
they are damnable traitors Kittycatkat Jan 2022 #54
Someone needs to remind the Mrs. Thomas that... ProudMNDemocrat Jan 2022 #2
Same for Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Coney Barrett. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #6
McConnell changed the rules Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #11
Thank you. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #18
Kid, you really nailed it....... MyOwnPeace Jan 2022 #20
RBG would only get 48 now. SergeStorms Jan 2022 #25
Because They Literally Could Not... GB_RN Jan 2022 #12
Mitch McConnell, the Gravedigger of American Democracy Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #19
Definitely A Little More Detail There... GB_RN Jan 2022 #33
That would leave 5 justices... ShazzieB Jan 2022 #14
More than "concerning"... Ginni Cha Jan 2022 #5
VRWC Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #8
Yes she was and of course Cha Jan 2022 #9
+1 llmart Jan 2022 #10
Vast right wing conspiracy by the deplorable. wnylib Jan 2022 #40
I would like to see her burned at the staked. LiberalFighter Jan 2022 #13
that's called air pollution!! monkeyman1 Jan 2022 #17
Her husband thinks torture is OK. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #32
That person is a un-American pos rockfordfile Jan 2022 #15
That is a fact. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #34
Don't we have a system in place, Mrs. Thomas, to address whether wrong was done or not? Mr. Ected Jan 2022 #21
It's an admission of guilt, casting aspersions on a duly appointed body. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #46
Oh Ginni... musette_sf Jan 2022 #22
May the proceedings make noises and sparks like aluminum foil in the radar range. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #47
Pretty much says Clarence should recuse himself. Captain Zero Jan 2022 #23
Should but won't Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2022 #26
A lot has been said over the years how Thomas rarely speaks. I have a petty good idea why. usaf-vet Jan 2022 #27
Thomas rarely speaks because of the old saying ... aggiesal Jan 2022 #37
Good on! Buts she still is a loud mouth B*T*H. usaf-vet Jan 2022 #49
Good idea. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #48
Kick and rec Kingofalldems Jan 2022 #28
Everything they say is the opposite of reality. CaptainTruth Jan 2022 #29
That name sounds familiar. Didn't he get into trouble over Boomerproud Jan 2022 #30
You could look it up. And you can address the serious concerns he is niyad Jan 2022 #43
Treasonous dissidents bucolic_frolic Jan 2022 #31
K&R UTUSN Jan 2022 #35
Somebody owns that guy. C Moon Jan 2022 #36
Only the wealthiest can put Clarence Thomas up at Bohemian Grove. Kid Berwyn Jan 2022 #45
jesus. :O C Moon Jan 2022 #52
Is she really wearing the thing on her head? ToxMarz Jan 2022 #41
That's for real. PlanetBev Jan 2022 #42
The lady doth protest too much, methinks Takket Jan 2022 #44
Yeah, Thomas should've recused himself ... just ... fuckin wow !!! uponit7771 Jan 2022 #53

dchill

(38,474 posts)
1. Does "done nothing wrong" include...
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:12 PM
Jan 2022

...paying for several busloads of rioters to get to DC? IFIRC, Ginni did that...

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
4. That story fell off Corporate McPravda's radar PDQ.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:19 PM
Jan 2022

Among her her many, uh, hats Ginni is a director of a swell group of well-heeled haters called the Council of National Policy. They ginned up the Big Lie.



Ginni Thomas, Wife of the Supreme Court Justice, Helped Advance the Election Disinformation Campaign – Here’s How

by Kristin Doerr, Right Wing Watch
New Civil Rights Movement, Jan. 13, 2021

Excerpt…

In the days leading up to the Jan. 6 mayhem, and on the day itself, the connection between CNP and Stop the Steal—and the campaign’s influence on the White House—became more apparent.

On Dec. 30, Right Wing Watch posted a report about a letter sent by the Conservative Action Project to Senate Republicans urging them to “contest the electoral votes” from “Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona”—the battleground states Biden won. That letter may have not mentioned Stop the Steal by name, but it asked senators to do exactly what Stop the Steal was demanding of Republican members of Congress: to reject electoral votes in favor of Biden.

Continues…

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2021/01/ginni-thomas-wife-of-the-supreme-court-justice-helped-advance-the-election-disinformation-campaign-heres-how/



Maybe Mrs. Thomas should get a subpoena…

SergeStorms

(19,199 posts)
24. Maybe he shouldn't get a subpoena.....
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 06:40 PM
Jan 2022

but he damned well should get the hell off the Supreme Court.

You can be a political activist, or you can be a fair and impartial judge, but you can't be both.

Thomas should resign from the Supreme Court, but you know he never will. He's a conservative, and if there are two things conservatives lack, it's honor and integrity.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,784 posts)
2. Someone needs to remind the Mrs. Thomas that...
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:17 PM
Jan 2022

1) Busting out windows at the Capitol
2) Busting down doors
3) Deficating on the carpets and smearing it on the walls in the halls
4) Entering Congressional offices and STEALING stuff
5) Beating Police with poles, their guns, shields, etc.
6) Seeking out Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence to do them harm
7) trashing Congressional offices
8) trashing through the Chambers and hanging from the rafters so to speak

IS DOING a LOT of wrong. Ginni Thomas is off her rocker and her Ass. Justice husband needs to recuse himself or face consequences of conflict of intetest.

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
6. Same for Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Coney Barrett.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:23 PM
Jan 2022

Tools appointed by a traitor.

I really wonder why there was no Democratic filibuster.

Mr.Bill

(24,282 posts)
11. McConnell changed the rules
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:52 PM
Jan 2022

so that only 51 votes are required to seat a Supreme Court Justice. So they can all be proud that only republicans voted for them. Ruth Bader Ginsburg got 93 votes from the Senate.

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
18. Thank you.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 06:03 PM
Jan 2022

I’m steamed the only time we Democrats can filibuster is when we don’t need it and the only time the pukes cannot use it is when they don’t need to filibuster.

Something is very wrong when Putin’s Poodle Dimdonnie Drumpfler gets to appoint three Associate Justices. And there was nothing we could do about it.

Now, when we need to do a heckuva lot more than expand the Supreme Court, we can’t do squat.

MyOwnPeace

(16,926 posts)
20. Kid, you really nailed it.......
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 06:14 PM
Jan 2022

The inability to 'do what is right,' both FOR something and AGAINST something has really kicked us where it does hurt...

SergeStorms

(19,199 posts)
25. RBG would only get 48 now.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 06:46 PM
Jan 2022

Manchin would demand bipartisan support before he'd vote to confirm, and Sinema...oh, look at those fantastic earrings! 🤪 They'd go wonderfully with my magenta poodle skirt!

GB_RN

(2,350 posts)
12. Because They Literally Could Not...
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:53 PM
Jan 2022

The Repukes nuked the filibuster for SCOTUS nominees when tRump nominated Gorsuck for Scalia's seat (after McConnell held the seat open to keep Obama from appointing Garland). The Democrats initiated a filibuster, then McConnell and company nuked it; changed the rules so that SCOTUS nominees (the last federal appointees that could be filibustered at that point) could no longer be filibustered. When Kava-Nope! and Amy COVID Barrett came around, there was a whole lotta nothing they could do.

The Democrats had previously changed the rules for all other nominees and federal judges during the Obama administration because McConnell and the Repukes had filibustered nearly every nominee Obama made after 2012. So, then Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid changed the rules to try and move things forward. McConnell swore revenge...he got it. But, he was obstructing Obama's choices on an unprecedented scale and with obvious (racist) malice.

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
19. Mitch McConnell, the Gravedigger of American Democracy
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 06:12 PM
Jan 2022

“If the US has someone whom historians will look back on as the gravedigger of American democracy, it is Mitch McConnell. He stoked the hyperpolarization of American politics to make the Obama presidency as dysfunctional and paralyzed as he possibly could. As with parliamentary gridlock in Weimar, congressional gridlock in the US has diminished respect for democratic norms, allowing McConnell to trample them even more. Nowhere is this vicious circle clearer than in the obliteration of traditional precedents concerning judicial appointments. Systematic obstruction of nominations in Obama’s first term provoked Democrats to scrap the filibuster for all but Supreme Court nominations. Then McConnell’s unprecedented blocking of the Merrick Garland nomination required him in turn to scrap the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations in order to complete the “steal” of Antonin Scalia’s seat and confirm Neil Gorsuch. The extreme politicization of the judicial nomination process is once again on display in the current Kavanaugh hearings.“

Source:

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/10/25/suffocation-of-democracy/

Thank you for the summation! I hope these crooks in robes get a full measure of the justice they deserve.

GB_RN

(2,350 posts)
33. Definitely A Little More Detail There...
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 07:50 PM
Jan 2022

Than what I was able to give. Lol

I’m a bit of a political junkie, and I also follow a site for political junkies, so the history, or at least the basics of it, sticks with me.

Cha

(297,160 posts)
5. More than "concerning"... Ginni
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:22 PM
Jan 2022

Thomas is a Stupid Idiot POS Fuck.

That coming her Means they did Everything WRONG!

As IF we couldn't see it with our own eyes!

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
8. VRWC
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:26 PM
Jan 2022

Sec. Sen. Dr. Clinton was right.

The right are organized, funded, ruthless and driven.

And it’s clear they are traitors.

llmart

(15,536 posts)
10. +1
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 05:33 PM
Jan 2022

She was criticized for calling it a "vast, right wing conspiracy". It's continued to this day.

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
34. That is a fact.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 07:50 PM
Jan 2022

Their conspiracy isn’t cabal-sized, it’s nationwide. The thing is, the GOP is a seditious criminal organization. The government is gonna need a bigger RICO Act. And a lot more lawyers.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
21. Don't we have a system in place, Mrs. Thomas, to address whether wrong was done or not?
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 06:23 PM
Jan 2022

I know it's more your husband's bailiwick than yours, but a Congressional investigatory committee or a court of law may be the Constitutional way to proceed. We've already witnessed that many, many people were found to have broken American laws on 1/6, so the assertion that everyone involved was a private citizen who've done nothing wrong" has already been proven to be fallacious.

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
46. It's an admission of guilt, casting aspersions on a duly appointed body.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 01:01 AM
Jan 2022

Knowledge of a crime that no one mentioned, private citizens working in concert to overturn the election, also bears investigation.

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
47. May the proceedings make noises and sparks like aluminum foil in the radar range.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 01:11 AM
Jan 2022

Like little cyber ninjas going “Pop! Pop! Zot!”

Defending the Republic. For cash.

https://littlesis.org/org/410878-Defending_the_Republic

usaf-vet

(6,181 posts)
27. A lot has been said over the years how Thomas rarely speaks. I have a petty good idea why.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 07:01 PM
Jan 2022
Because the BIT*H he is married to hasn't told him what his position is.

Why do we continue to let her influence the decisions on the SCOTUS?

aggiesal

(8,911 posts)
37. Thomas rarely speaks because of the old saying ...
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 07:57 PM
Jan 2022

It is better to sit with your mouth shut and appear stupid,
then to open it and remove all doubt.

Kid Berwyn

(14,892 posts)
45. Only the wealthiest can put Clarence Thomas up at Bohemian Grove.
Wed Jan 19, 2022, 12:57 AM
Jan 2022
Justice Thomas reported a wealth of gifts

In the last six years he has accepted free items valued at $42,200, the most on the high court.


December 31, 2004|Richard A. Serrano and David G. Savage | LA Times Staff Writers

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has accepted tens of thousands of dollars worth of gifts since joining the high court, including $1,200 worth of tires, valuable historical items and a $5,000 personal check to help pay a relative's education expenses.

SNIP...

He also took a free trip aboard a private jet to the exclusive Bohemian Grove club in Northern California -- arranged by a wealthy Texas real estate investor who helped run an advocacy group that filed briefs with the Supreme Court.

Those and other gifts were disclosed by Thomas under a 1978 federal ethics law that requires high-ranking government officials, including the nine Supreme Court justices, to file a report each year that lists gifts, money and other items they have received.

Thomas has reported accepting much more valuable gifts than his Supreme Court colleagues over the last six years, according to their disclosure forms on file at the court.

CONTINUED...

http://articles.latimes.com/2004/dec/31/nation/na-gifts31

Gee. I wonder what the rich get in return?

PlanetBev

(4,104 posts)
42. That's for real.
Tue Jan 18, 2022, 09:47 PM
Jan 2022

She’s worn that several times in public. She’s know a very silly, but vicious individual.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ex-FBI Strzok: Concerning...