General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI just watched the exchange between Doocy and POTUS.
As best as I could make out, Peter Doocy asked POTUS something like "Is inflation a liability"?
POTUS responded with something like "No, it's a great asset".
POTUS then followed up with "What a stupid son of a bitch".
Here you have a journalist asking an inane question in bad faith.
The question was delivered in an attempt to bust balls, so it was responded to with sarcasm and a mild appropriate insult.
Tit for tat.
No big deal.
Response from POTUS was right on the mark, and probably similar to how most humans would have responded.
What should POTUS have said otherwise to a bullshit question? Should he have gone into some long diatribe about inflationary pressures?
It's not a bad thing to call a stupid son of a bitch a stupid son of a bitch, if one acts like a stupid son of a bitch.
UTUSN
(71,889 posts)Skittles
(156,940 posts)he should just ignored Doocy
OAITW r.2.0
(27,011 posts)Can't edit cut because too explicit and direct. What to do?
littlemissmartypants
(23,673 posts)msongs
(69,353 posts)monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)orangecrush
(21,015 posts)rockfordfile
(8,724 posts)Rhiannon12866
(216,726 posts)Nixie
(17,316 posts)for him, so this is probably okay. That image of being the sarcastic alpha type seems to be a political advantage, for the most part.
FSogol
(46,024 posts)kacekwl
(7,300 posts)I don't understand why Doocy is called on at all. Aren't questions reserved for news media?
Demsrule86
(70,607 posts)Beausoleil
(2,906 posts)"Enemy of the people" but didn't. I admire Biden's restraint!
LizBeth
(10,563 posts)and kind of appropriate the delivery, though apologizing is not a big deal either. It was fine the comment was put out there for people to hear.