Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSteny Hoyer says he's 'not sure that it's necessary' to ban lawmakers from stock trading because ins
insider trading is already illegalHouse Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said on Tuesday that Democrats would consider a stock trading ban for members of Congress, but said he was "not sure that it's necessary" because blatant insider trading is already illegal.
Hoyer's comments come after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reversed her firm opposition to a ban, and other Democratic leaders signaled that they'd consider a flood of new proposals to ban stock trading by lawmakers. "If members want to do that, I'm okay with that," she said last week.
In an interview with Politico, Hoyer was asked about a letter from Rep. Jared Golden of Maine first reported by Insider that called for both Pelosi and Republican House leader Kevin McCarthy to "swiftly bring legislation" to ban stock trading to the floor. The bipartisan letter was signed by 27 lawmakers and included members from across the ideological spectrum, ranging from Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan to Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida.
"This is an issue that I think is dealt with in present law," said Hoyer. He referred to the case of former Republican Rep. Chris Collins of New York, who resigned from Congress in 2018 and was sentenced to several months in jail for insider trading.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-majority-leader-steny-hoyer-says-he-s-not-sure-that-it-s-necessary-to-ban-lawmakers-from-stock-trading-because-insider-trading-is-already-illegal/ar-AAT8DuA
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 785 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steny Hoyer says he's 'not sure that it's necessary' to ban lawmakers from stock trading because ins (Original Post)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jan 2022
OP
Passing a bipartisan bill to stop legislators from active trading is fine by me
Freethinker65
Jan 2022
#5
onecaliberal
(32,900 posts)1. Nope. If the law was enforced, there wouldn't be many left.t.
people making 150,000 a year do not become millionaires after being in congress for one year for nothing.
Srkdqltr
(6,323 posts)2. Guess who has stock??
Generic Brad
(14,276 posts)3. Steny might want to rethink that stance
Voters have had it with the greed and anyone who doesn't support the Congressional stock trading ban does so at their own peril.
In It to Win It
(8,285 posts)4. If we think judges can't remain impartial when making decisions
when it involves a company they own stock in...
Why would we think legislators can be impartial when making! the fucking rules! FOR OUR ENTIRE SOCIETY??????
Freethinker65
(10,058 posts)5. Passing a bipartisan bill to stop legislators from active trading is fine by me
Let Hoyer vote against it. When it passes, expect to see lots of legislators that knew the current insider trading laws would never be enforced, suddenly put their/their family's money in passive or blind investments.