Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's time. A Protestant hasn't been nominated to the Supreme Court for almost 32 years (Original Post) Jose Garcia Jan 2022 OP
black woman never bigtree Jan 2022 #1
A black woman hasn't been nominated to the Supreme Court for almost... well, never. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2022 #2
Didn't Clinton Nominate RobinA Jan 2022 #61
Attorney General I think. tblue37 Jan 2022 #68
Better yet, a non-religious affiliated individual. FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #3
+1 chowder66 Jan 2022 #35
+1000 USALiberal Jan 2022 #45
An atheist would be great. lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #64
Yes, that is overdue. BSdetect Jan 2022 #70
Absolutely FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #74
I agree. kairos12 Jan 2022 #77
When was the last time an Athiest was nominated? Angleae Jan 2022 #4
Nope, we're at the mercy of people who believe in a magic sky dude for concise analytical thinking NightWatcher Jan 2022 #27
Atheists are the most under-represented Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #33
lol nt BootinUp Jan 2022 #46
We don't know. Most sensible people who don't believe Hortensis Jan 2022 #67
That RobinA Jan 2022 #72
Why is that important? Leith Jan 2022 #5
Ahem... Mossfern Jan 2022 #12
I stand corrected Leith Jan 2022 #16
Breyer and Kagan are Jewish too Polybius Jan 2022 #53
Abe Fortas, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan... Hekate Jan 2022 #21
Thank you. nt BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #37
Brandeis, Cardozo, Frankfurter, Goldberg, Fortas, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan... Hekate Jan 2022 #22
This one baffles ForgedCrank Jan 2022 #29
I Don't Think RobinA Jan 2022 #75
There have been a total of eight Jewish Justices of the Supreme Court. hedda_foil Jan 2022 #32
Do more research! Nt USALiberal Jan 2022 #47
protestant pamdb Jan 2022 #6
An atheist would be a boss selection if we have to use this as a litmus. nt Gore1FL Jan 2022 #7
Well..this is interesting Deuxcents Jan 2022 #8
Religious tests are banned by Article VI of the Constitution. lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #69
Ty.. Deuxcents Jan 2022 #71
Well past time for an atheist, and who is also a black woman. Queer would be a bonus. Celerity Jan 2022 #9
Sorry, but the "no religious test" clause of the Constituion means exactly that n/t markpkessinger Jan 2022 #10
no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust... lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #65
I want to see a LGBTQ on the court! William769 Jan 2022 #11
I'm a gay woman, and I couldn't care less about anyone's sexual orientation. nt BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #38
You have my sympathy. nt William769 Jan 2022 #56
Just a reminder that Justice Sotomayor is Catholic n/t markpkessinger Jan 2022 #13
As are Zeitghost Jan 2022 #14
If only all the Catholics on the court was as brilliant and talented as Justice Sotomayor SharonClark Jan 2022 #15
Of 115 SCOTUS Justices sarisataka Jan 2022 #17
Well spotted. nt BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #39
Separation of church and state dclarston13 Jan 2022 #18
And yet... Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #34
Yet Protestants have made up over 85% of ALL justices. Torchlight Jan 2022 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author RB TexLa Jan 2022 #54
Why not a Unitarian? tenderfoot Jan 2022 #20
Early on, I believe there was; and/or Deist Hekate Jan 2022 #25
Gorsuch confirmed as a Catholic. VGNonly Jan 2022 #23
There is a split in Episcopalianism that is VERY Captain Zero Jan 2022 #50
The particular church seems to be fairly welcoming, which was enough for the rabid RW to attack it muriel_volestrangler Jan 2022 #59
Why not just state no more Federalist Society picks? Hekate Jan 2022 #24
That would be best, FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #42
A principled jurist with an eye on the future. Nothing else is relevant. Mr. Ected Jan 2022 #26
Yes, the poor underrepresented Protestants of this country will have their day at last. Act_of_Reparation Jan 2022 #28
Affirmative actions for WASPS iemanja Jan 2022 #30
Athiest? No. Xolodno Jan 2022 #31
I have to admit. I've never paid attention to the religion of any of them. BlackSkimmer Jan 2022 #36
I'd rather have an atheist or Buddhist Bluesaph Jan 2022 #40
Gorsuch is a protestant fishwax Jan 2022 #41
Thank God! Goodheart Jan 2022 #43
An atheist of any sort, never. Voltaire2 Jan 2022 #44
I want someone who never references their own faith BootinUp Jan 2022 #48
How about: religion shouldn't be a factor at all? brooklynite Jan 2022 #49
This is a proxy debate over abortion NutmegYankee Jan 2022 #51
But no Biden nominee is going to be opposed to abortion rights... brooklynite Jan 2022 #52
Amazing how 32 year without a Protestant nominee is apparently more offensive than the 210 years RB TexLa Jan 2022 #55
Not sure where "210 years" has come from muriel_volestrangler Jan 2022 #60
Troll tenderfoot Jan 2022 #57
Yep RandiFan1290 Jan 2022 #58
I think it's time for Atheists to be appointed. Sick and Tired of Religious based decisions msfiddlestix Jan 2022 #62
"no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust" lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #63
No kidding. FoxNewsSucks Jan 2022 #73
I give no fucks about justices' religious views -- I only care about their take on the law. SYFROYH Jan 2022 #66
Fuck ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLL of THAT!!!!! CrackityJones75 Jan 2022 #76
And an atheist NEVER... Happy Hoosier Jan 2022 #78
Ridiculous n/t kcr Jan 2022 #79
As silly as I think this post is, I see no reason to delete it. I think all us calling LizBeth Jan 2022 #80

RobinA

(9,903 posts)
61. Didn't Clinton Nominate
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 10:06 AM
Jan 2022

Lani Guinier for SC? I could be remembering this wrong and it was for something else.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
3. Better yet, a non-religious affiliated individual.
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 06:12 PM
Jan 2022

A black, female with no religious ties works great for me.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
64. An atheist would be great.
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 10:34 AM
Jan 2022

But let's start with Article VI

no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
74. Absolutely
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 12:21 PM
Jan 2022

I think Article 6 together with the 1st Amendment is supposed to be that "wall of separation" between church and state. The fact that Article 6 appears and was written ahead of the 1st amendment makes me think that keeping church out of state was a priority.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
67. We don't know. Most sensible people who don't believe
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 10:53 AM
Jan 2022

in a deity and do lead public lives don't make a big thing of their lack of "faith."

When religion is not what you're about, you don't want others making you about it either. And that involves not letting others turn your disinterest in religion what you're about. I look for signs of religious involvement in their history instead.

As for actually labeling oneself "atheist," I wonder how many people do. You seldom hear it. Wouldn't thoughtful people who really don't care nevertheless first feel obliged to see what it means before slapping it on as a label? Which school of religious-intensity atheistic belief should they adopt after lengthy study? My beliefs on such things could far more accurately be summed up as "beats me" and that's as far as my delving goes. Disinterest is the opposite of religion, not atheism.

Leith

(7,814 posts)
5. Why is that important?
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 06:32 PM
Jan 2022

ALL SC justices have been Christian - isn't that "good enough?"

Perhaps you would like to explain why it is important to have more nominees and judges of certain sects on the highest court?

It took almost 200 years to get a Catholic president. Was it because Catholics didn't make up a large enough portion of the population?

Has there ever been an atheist, Sikh, Muslim, or any member of other religions nominated or seated? Is it because there aren't enough of them among the citizenry to seriously consider them? Well, more than half the population of the US are female. How does that compare to the number of women on the court?

Leith

(7,814 posts)
16. I stand corrected
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:02 PM
Jan 2022

Yes, I forgot about that.

It still doesn't mean that a protestant is next in "the rotation."

Hekate

(91,003 posts)
22. Brandeis, Cardozo, Frankfurter, Goldberg, Fortas, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan...
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:26 PM
Jan 2022

They are, in chronological order: Louis Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, Felix Frankfurter, Arthur Goldberg, Abe Fortas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-8-jewish-justices-who-made-the-us-supreme-court-jump/


ForgedCrank

(1,786 posts)
29. This one baffles
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:35 PM
Jan 2022

me as well.
Qualifications would seem to be primary on the list or prerequisites. Why make it about religion?

RobinA

(9,903 posts)
75. I Don't Think
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 12:24 PM
Jan 2022

it should be about anything but qualifications. As a female, I could not care less about the gender, race or religion of the justices. I just want someone who will rule the way I feel is appropriate. The all male, all white (until the end) Warren court was the most liberal in my lifetime. Amy Comey Barrett is a female and benefits females not at all. And let's not even go there with what an asset Thomas has been to those of similar race. Or anyone else, for that matter. Just give me a smart liberal and I'll be happy.

hedda_foil

(16,377 posts)
32. There have been a total of eight Jewish Justices of the Supreme Court.
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:45 PM
Jan 2022

They are: Louis D. Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, Felix Frankfurter, Arthur Goldberg, Abe Fortas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, and Elena Kagan.

pamdb

(1,333 posts)
6. protestant
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 06:35 PM
Jan 2022


Far, far, far, too many catholics on the court. Frankly, I would love to see an atheist on the court.

And I was raised catholic, 12 years of catholic school. Never took.

Deuxcents

(16,441 posts)
8. Well..this is interesting
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 06:41 PM
Jan 2022

Thankfully, there’s no litmus test for religion for the SC..at least that I know of. Their oath, as w/ the office of President, Congress, etc. is to the constitution.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
69. Religious tests are banned by Article VI of the Constitution.
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 10:58 AM
Jan 2022

no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States

SharonClark

(10,014 posts)
15. If only all the Catholics on the court was as brilliant and talented as Justice Sotomayor
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 06:59 PM
Jan 2022

and not to the right of Father Coughlin.

sarisataka

(18,895 posts)
17. Of 115 SCOTUS Justices
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:03 PM
Jan 2022

91 have been Protestant, 15 Catholic, 8 Jewish and 1 unspecified.

'Other' is far more overdue.

Torchlight

(3,423 posts)
19. Yet Protestants have made up over 85% of ALL justices.
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:11 PM
Jan 2022

The inherent bias of flawed religious litmus tests aside, I don't think your argument is on firm ground.

Response to Torchlight (Reply #19)

Captain Zero

(6,861 posts)
50. There is a split in Episcopalianism that is VERY
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 10:25 PM
Jan 2022

VERY VERY conservative on one side. It's a minority in that denomination, but there is indeed a conservative Episcopal Church in the US. I would bet Gorsuch attends that one (?).

They are especially opposed to women as priests or bishops as I remember.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,411 posts)
59. The particular church seems to be fairly welcoming, which was enough for the rabid RW to attack it
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 07:00 AM
Jan 2022
He was raised Catholic but now worships with his wife and two daughters at St. John's Episcopal Church in Boulder, Colorado. Like the city, the congregation is politically liberal. It bars guns from its campus and installed solar panels; it condemns harsh rhetoric about Muslims and welcomes gays and lesbians. And its rector, the Rev. Susan Springer, attended the Women's March in Denver, though not as a form of protest but as a sign of support for "the dignity of every human being."

Springer says St. John's is carrying out the covenant Episcopalians recite during baptisms: to strive for justice and peace among all people. Her congregation, she added, includes liberals, conservatives and all political points in between.
...
"Be advised," blared a tweet from Bryan Fischer, a host on the American Family Radio Network. "Gorsuch attends a church that is rabidly pro-gay, pro-Muslim, pro-green, and anti-Trump."
...
Another columnist argued that if conservatives complained about Barack Obama's former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, shouldn't they also grumble about Gorsuch's?

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/18/politics/neil-gorsuch-religion/index.html

The Hill managed to ask if Gorsuch was a "secret liberal". Dumbasses.

Mr. Ected

(9,675 posts)
26. A principled jurist with an eye on the future. Nothing else is relevant.
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:29 PM
Jan 2022

No political affiliation, just jurisprudence in line with Democratic ideals.

For life.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
28. Yes, the poor underrepresented Protestants of this country will have their day at last.
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 07:32 PM
Jan 2022

If my eyes could roll back any further, I'd be looking straight ahead.

fishwax

(29,150 posts)
41. Gorsuch is a protestant
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 08:21 PM
Jan 2022

He was raised Catholic, but has apparently been episcopalian for years. (Also, for the record, Harriet Miers was nominated and I think she was Methodist, though of course her nomination was quickly withdrawn.)

Personally I'd be happy to see a non-affiliated person get the nod, though.

BootinUp

(47,211 posts)
48. I want someone who never references their own faith
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 10:20 PM
Jan 2022

in connection with their job as a judge/politician. And I have no preference for their religious affiliation. Of course, they must meet other more important qualifications.

NutmegYankee

(16,204 posts)
51. This is a proxy debate over abortion
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 10:33 PM
Jan 2022

My protestant family had this discussion over the holidays. Are we really going to lose freedom on reproduction and be forced to follow the tenets of a faith not our own? Make no mistake, my solidly Blue family was all in on that feeling.

There are no secular arguments to ban abortion. It's a purely religious view that will be forced on those who don't agree by force. And people will die, just like my Great Great Grandmother. She died of sepsis from a "back alley" abortion.

brooklynite

(94,950 posts)
52. But no Biden nominee is going to be opposed to abortion rights...
Wed Jan 26, 2022, 10:51 PM
Jan 2022

And no Republican is going to vote for them on that basis. Religion isn't a relevant factor.

 

RB TexLa

(17,003 posts)
55. Amazing how 32 year without a Protestant nominee is apparently more offensive than the 210 years
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 02:59 AM
Jan 2022

before there was a Catholic nominee.

I don't see anything wrong with a Jesuit educated African-American woman nominee.

msfiddlestix

(7,288 posts)
62. I think it's time for Atheists to be appointed. Sick and Tired of Religious based decisions
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 10:08 AM
Jan 2022

I want a hard line between Church and State which includes the United States Supreme Court!

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
63. "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust"
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 10:34 AM
Jan 2022

Article VI

Which part of this do you not understand?

Personally, I'd like to see some Atheists on SCOTUS; would allow more rational decisions. But I'll go with what the Constitution says.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
73. No kidding.
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 12:18 PM
Jan 2022

Just more rightwing hypocrisy.

Employers aren't allowed to ask about applicant religion. Yet every damn election, which is literally politicians applying for their jobs, they spend more time professing their piety and "faith" than they do on issues. Making a spectacle of themselves praying or going to church. Every election has been a clear violation of Article 6.

LizBeth

(9,953 posts)
80. As silly as I think this post is, I see no reason to delete it. I think all us calling
Thu Jan 27, 2022, 12:42 PM
Jan 2022

it out is more effective.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's time. A Protestant h...