General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Billy Graham bashing threads are misguided
his son has been pulling an Edith Wilson act (look it up) for years. The man had a great (and earlier not so great) record on inclusion and pluralism. His son is a total dick and also behind all of this closed minded crap. Again, google Edith Wilson.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)... in this. His children are mean spoiled brats that are not Christ like.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Like when he said AIDs was gods judgement?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts).... until he was forced too.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)of a complex life that I wil not as easily as you force to fit my stereotypes.
Politics
Graham is a registered member of the Democratic Party.[35] In 1960 he was opposed to the candidacy of John F. Kennedy because he was Catholic, and worked "behind the scenes" to encourage influential Protestant ministers to speak out against him.[36] Graham met with a conference of Protestant ministers in Montreux, Switzerland during the 1960 campaign, to discuss their mobilizing congregations to defeat Kennedy. He did not comment publicly on the election.[37] According to the PBS Frontline program, God in America (2010), Episode 5, Graham also organized a meeting in September 1960 of hundreds of Protestant ministers in Washington, DC to this purpose; Norman Vincent Peale led the meeting.[36] This was shortly before Kennedy's speech on the separation of church and state in Houston, Texas, which was considered to be successful in meeting concerns of many voters.
Graham leaned toward the Republicans during the presidency of Richard Nixon whom he had met and befriended as vice president under Dwight Eisenhower.[17] He did not completely ally himself with the later religious right, saying that Jesus did not have a political party.[7] He has given his support to various political candidates over the years.[17]
He refused to join Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority in 1979, saying: "I'm for morality, but morality goes beyond sex to human freedom and social justice. We as clergy know so very little to speak with authority on the Panama Canal or superiority of armaments. Evangelists cannot be closely identified with any particular party or person. We have to stand in the middle in order to preach to all people, right and left. I haven't been faithful to my own advice in the past. I will be in the future."[25]
According to a 2006 Newsweek interview, "For Graham, politics is a secondary to the Gospel.... When Newsweek asked Graham whether ministerswhether they think of themselves as evangelists, pastors or a bit of bothshould spend time engaged with politics, he replied: 'You know, I think in a way that has to be up to the individual as he feels led of the Lord. A lot of things that I commented on years ago would not have been of the Lord, I'm sure, but I think you have somelike communism, or segregation, on which I think you have a responsibility to speak out.'"[38]
In 2012, Graham publicly endorsed the Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney.[39] Shortly after, references to Mormonism as a cult were removed from Graham's website.[40][41]
Logical
(22,457 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)caught on a Nixon tape.
sounds like you want to believe a fairy tale about Billy Graham rather than the truth.
slampoet
(5,032 posts)case closed.
piechartking
(617 posts)You can make the case to Christians you know about this whole snafu:
Put it in simple terms about their choices:
1) You actually believe your own leaders and principles, and won't vote for a Mormon because you think it goes against your religion. OR
2) You admit that your beliefs are shit and winning a secular election is more important than what the majority of your church thinks is correct. (In which case, aren't you shitting on your religion, then?) OR
3) You can see that your side holds its own principles in disdain (whenever there's something TRULY important going on - like a Presidential election) and vote Obama (or just stay home).
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
JI7
(89,249 posts)leader.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Billy Graham preached a single intolerant path to salvation.
More to the point as one of the leading bible thumping voices, ultimately the greatest, to rise out of the South he could have had an impact on the beatings, the lynchings and the entire civil rights struggle.
He never said one god damn word about it during the 60s and we now know from the tapes that he was clearly not only a racist but an antisemtic sob.
Billy Graham was a superficial bible thumper who preached a non biblical myth of personal salvation that was consistent with a growing individualist consumer society but had very little to do with first century Christianity.
JI7
(89,249 posts)and they are the ones who deserve credit and respect.
Fuck Billy Graham, fucking bigoted piece of shit.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)And this re the 1960's Civil Rights Movement . . . . "He never said one god damn word about it during the 60s and we now know from the tapes that he was clearly not only a racist but an antisemtic sob. "
Catholic priests, clergy from other protestant denominations, rabbis ALL joined in in the Civil Rights marches. Where was Graham? Cuddling up to Nixon.
Billy Graham started out as a revivalist preacher -- the hellfire and brimstone type that USED to be the fringe in this country right up until the time the Republicans brought them in in 1980 to help elect Reagan. Now, not only won't they go away they're getting elected!
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I got to give him his due for that. The guy is like the pope in terms of his status and influence, but for America. I can respect this, he has been at this a long, long time. I don't have to agree with his religion to give him credit for this.
Rocky888
(297 posts)He is only about money and power. I still say, any church organization preaching politics should start paying taxes?
Tutonic
(2,522 posts)Has Billy been abandoned by his legal and ministry advisors? I can't believe that he handed the reigns entirely to Franklin. Billy may be be frail and feeble but I believe that he still has his lucid moments. Franklin was never a bright child but I don't think that he would have washed the site of its reference to Mormonism asa Cult without some approval by Billy or his advisors.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
JI7
(89,249 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and you're 100% wrong to refer to people who call out Billy Graham's bigotry as "bashing".
you do realize you have bashed DUers, don't you?
Daemonaquila
(1,712 posts)All bible-thumpers, especially those who practice that filthy art on TV and radio, would never be missed if they mysteriously fell into a pit if quick-lime some dark night.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)He worked tirelessly to make American life suck, but there were people who were worse.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I try to come off as tolerant of all faiths but the truth is I am mistrustful of evangelicals and I will tell you why. Underneath their niceties, their agenda is ALWAYS to convert. I know. My father has been after me and my kids for years. It doesn't matter how nice they come off their ultimate agenda is to convert you. And their attitude that its okay if you don't convert now because in the end everyone will bow down to God. This is especially true of how they feel toward Jews. They play nice with Jews now but they know in their hearts that when the time comes even the Jews will bow down to God. It is so condescending. Do I think Billy Graham was inclusive and pluralist? No. I don't.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)I could care less what he was, what matters is today and the future.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/bigot
bigot
noun /ˈbɪg.ət/ [C] disapproving
Definition
a person who has strong, unreasonable beliefs and who thinks that anyone who does not have the same beliefs is wrong
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)right?
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)He encouraged Nixon to increase the bombing. In April 1969, he sent a thirteen-page letter to Nixon titled, The Confidential Missionary Plan for Ending the Vietnam War. Graham wrote:
"There are tens of thousands of North Vietnamese defectors to bomb and invade the north. Especially let them bomb the dikes which could over night destroy the economy of North Vietnam." (p. 109--From Richard M. Nixon Presidential Materials, National Archive)"There are tens of thousands of North Vietnamese defectors to bomb and invade the north. Especially let them bomb the dikes which could over night destroy the economy of North Vietnam." (p. 109--From Richard M. Nixon Presidential Materials, National Archive)
Bombing the dikes would have resulted in the deaths of a million civilians and destroyed the nation's agricultural system. Bothwell points out that according the Crimes of War Project that this would have amounted to a war crime. Hardly the suggestion of a man of peace.
Graham advised presidents on everything from foreign policy to selection of vice presidents to legislation.
http://www.shuckandjive.org/2007/12/billy-graham-prince-of-war.html
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Or so I have to assume... why else would Billy Graham have supported such a thing?
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)that's tighter, oh yeah!
cali
(114,904 posts)revisionist history, go for it. I won't shut up about his vile history.
sofia14x
(7 posts)?????????????????????