General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA chance for Kris Kobach to redeem himself-Arizona new proof of citizenship voting rule
I am a law nerd and I admit that my sense of humor is different. Back in 2018, I was following the best legal soap opera ever. Kris Kobach was one of TFG experts on his voter fraud commission. Kris was the Kansas Secretary of State and had promoted a law that required voters to show proof of citizenship to register to vote. Kobach had a side gig of trying to sell this proof of citizenship concept to other states. The ACLU sued and the Kansas Attorney General decided to let Kobach try this case. This trial was a wonderful soap opera that gave me a great deal of amusement.
Here is on thread on this case
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210350534
Kobach lost and was held in contempt by the judge and ordered to take some basic civil procedure course
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Now Kobach has the perfect case to redeem himself. Arizona has adopted a proof of citizenship law that is guaranteed to be challenged in court
Link to tweet
The bill, passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature, puts the onus on elections workers and voters to validate citizenship before a registrant can vote in presidential elections or cast a ballot by mail.
Election integrity means counting every lawful vote and prohibiting any attempt to illegally cast a vote, Ducey said in a letter Wednesday detailing his support for the bill......
In recent years, other GOP-led states have seen their proof-of-citizenship laws struck down in court. A federal judge tossed a similar Kansas law in 2018.
Arizona needs to hire Kobach to defend the new Arizona law. It has been three years and hopefully kobach has taken the remedial civil procedure courses by now.
This would make a great soap opera
sheshe2
(83,825 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,415 posts)This law will be challenged and is clearly unconstitutional
Link to tweet
State law already requires Arizona residents who want to register to vote in state elections to provide proof of citizenship. But this legislation, passed by the GOP-controlled legislature, extends those requirements to residents who are only voting in federal elections. Currently, individuals who use a federal voter registration form are required to attest under penalty of perjury that they are a citizen, but proof is not required......
Critics also say the bill would do most harm to voters who lack a valid state driver's license or identification card like students, the elderly and tribal communities. They say they are expecting litigation to challenge the legislation.
"We are exploring that option, joining with other groups," Pinny Sheoran, president-elect of the League of Women Voters of Arizona, told CNN.
In 2004, Arizona voters approved proposition 200, which requires individuals to provide proof of citizenship to vote in state elections. But in 2013, the US Supreme Court ruled that the state could not impose the citizenship requirement on federal-only voters.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,415 posts)I am still hoping that Arizona will hire Kobach for this lawsuit
Link to tweet
https://www.democracydocket.com/alerts/lawsuit-filed-against-arizonas-new-restrictive-proof-of-citizenship-law/
Finally, under this law the Arizona attorney generals office is tasked with investigating voters with missing citizenship statuses putting hundreds of thousands of voters at risk for having their registration improperly canceled or losing the ability to vote by mail. The lawsuit argues that H.B. 2492 will severely burden Arizona voters who registered to vote when there was not a proof of citizenship requirement. The plaintiffs highlight that the law could potentially disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters who fall into these categories, especially since the law does not specify if or how voters will be notified that their registration has become invalid.
The lawsuit outlines the Republican-controlled Legislatures push to limit access to voting, particularly vote by mail, which is an extremely popular method of voting in Arizona. Mi Familia Vota argues that this new law does not serve any justifiable state interest, pointing to the fact that, during the Legislatures consideration of the bill, no legislator identified a single instance of voter fraud or impropriety in Arizona related to mail-in early voting ballots that would precipitate the need for the changes at issue. The lawsuit argues that H.B. 2492 violates the First and 14th Amendments by severely burdening the right to vote and potentially disenfranchising Arizona voters and asks the court to block the law.