General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. senators call for planting on conserved land in response to Ukraine crisis
(Reuters) - Two U.S. Senators are joining farm groups and other lawmakers in calling on the Department of Agriculture to allow farmers to plant conserved acres this spring in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Republican Senators Marco Rubio and Cynthia Lummis sent a letter to agriculture secretary Tom Vilsack on March 31 calling on USDA to allow farmers to plant acres enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) without penalty.
"Allowing crop production on CRP lands is a critical step for stabilizing food prices that have skyrocketed in recent months, and to help American growers fulfill the unmet global demand for grains that threatens the lives of tens of millions of people," the Senators wrote.
USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/u-s-senators-call-for-planting-on-conserved-land-in-response-to-ukraine-crisis/ar-AAVL8AN
Coventina
(27,125 posts)I have no words to express how much I hate these people.
Botany
(70,522 posts)Besides who needs clean streams and less erosion anyway.
Budi
(15,325 posts)People tilled the native grasslands up to their front door. And the wind came sweeping down the plains.
Botany
(70,522 posts).... trees that were not native to the region.
If land has been in the CRP for any amount of time the idea that you can just mow it down,
till it, and then plant a crop on it is nuts. Livestock might be able to graze on it but it is worth
more to the farmer as is.
Budi
(15,325 posts)DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)Do you have one with those moisture sucking cedar trees that then contribute to wildfires getting out of control?
Farmers are totally abusing the CRP program.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)Oh well.
pecosbob
(7,541 posts)I'd wager it's the very same folks that voted against cheap insulin for Americans. Eff them and the horses they rode in on.
2naSalit
(86,650 posts)More National public land grazing acreage with lower fees, just watch.
wnylib
(21,500 posts)and without harming conservation land.
For decades the federal government has paid farmers to leave some land fallow in order to suppress production and maintain profitable prices. My husband's cousin had 600 fallow acres of farmland that earned him a supplemental income. He was also a Republican who used to rail against people getting government assistance in health care and food instead of working harder to earn money for food and medicine.
The feds could encourage planting those fallow acres in order to increase production. They would probably need to give farmers an incentive, but it would provide more food.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)CRP is already a much abused (by the farmers) program.
My uncles and grandfather always referred to the CRP program as welfare for farmers.
spanone
(135,846 posts)Raven123
(4,851 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,144 posts)their silos still, waiting for a better market to sell their grains, and now, that higher prices are here, they (Senators) want to kneecap farmers from enjoying higher prices for their crops (so this points to the wealthy middleman in the middle who buy and/or sell these crops are obviously chafing at the higher prices they have to pay).
Also, I think farmers are also realizing the value of setting aside acreage to lay fallow, unplanted, it gives the soil a chance to recharge itself, rest, etc., as well as helping wildlife.