General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHubris and isolation led Vladimir Putin to misjudge Ukraine
Washington Post/Paul Sonne, Ellen Nakashima, Shane Harris, John HudsonThousands of Russian battlefield deaths. Three front-line retreats by the Russian military. Millions of Ukrainians who will never forgive Moscow. More isolation than ever and perilously few goals achieved.
Putin is now regrouping to focus his military campaign on Ukraines east in what is widely seen as Plan B, after his forces failed to topple Ukraines government or wrest control of its biggest cities. All the while, questions are mounting about how a Russian leader steeped in security policy and known for railing against the folly of regime-change wars could have sleepwalked into a such a strategic morass.
At issue is a broader quandary that will occupy historians for years: How could Russia a country with such deep familial, cultural and historic ties to its western neighbor get Ukraine so wrong?
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/hubris-and-isolation-led-vladimir-putin-to-misjudge-ukraine/ar-AAW6KdW?ocid=BingNews
Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)Why do people act like the war is over? It's not a movie.
anamnua
(1,119 posts)Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)anamnua
(1,119 posts)Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)anamnua
(1,119 posts)I'll grant you that much.
brush
(53,826 posts)And you're right, the war is not over. Much time for more Russian failures.
Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)brush
(53,826 posts)Biophilic
(3,689 posts)How did Russia get Ukraine so wrong?
haele
(12,673 posts)Because Russian puppets and seeded "citizenry" in the east and old former Soviets favor Russia, along with recently outlawed corrupt media propogandists, mainstream Russia forgot that most Ukrainians have not willingly wanted to be Russian since the collapse of the Soviet Union. If not before.
Most Ukrainians - especially the emerging Ukrainian middle class - don't want to live under Oligarchs in a client status to Moscow.
But Moscow never considered what the Ukrainians wanted, just what would benefit Russia. Then again, Moscow doesn't consider what Siberia or any of the other vast but poor regions want. It serves Russia to keep those regions in a "traditional" mid-1930's Soviet subsistence economic state, totally beholden on Moscow for any infrastructure or "improvements".
Haele
pwb
(11,287 posts)Blowing up bridges and such. Get some Comrade little man.
LakeArenal
(28,835 posts)The idea you are omnipotent becomes your reality.
Right, Donald?
Crunchy Frog
(26,612 posts)It was made in 2014-2015 and basically chronicles the whole Russian aggression against Ukraine that started with the annexation of Crimea. It's direct coverage on the ground, as it happens, and it's giving me a lot more context and background for understanding current events.
One of the things you can see in this series is how astonishingly weak the Ukrainian military was. There's scene after scene of whole military installations surrendering to the separatists, or even joining them, or trying to engage them and ending up running and leaving vast amounts of heavy military equipment behind for them.
I suspect that Putin believed that he was still dealing with that military, and didn't realize that he's spent the past eight years training the Ukrainians military into a world class fighting force.
Anyway, here's the 1st episode in the series, if anyone is interested.