General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsManhattan DA's Star Witness: Indict Trump Now or I'm Out
Manhattan DAs Star Witness: Indict Trump Now or Im Out
LAST CHANCE
The grand jury that the Manhattan DA summoned to go after the Trump Organization expires at the end of the month. If it doesnt bring charges, a key witness says hes done.
Jose Pagliery
Political Investigations Reporter
Updated Apr. 21, 2022 5:43AM ET / Published Apr. 21, 2022 5:12AM ET
If Manhattan prosecutors dont indict former President Donald Trump with the grand jury theyve got in the next nine days, the key witness investigators have used to build their entire case says he wont help revive it in the future.
Michael Cohen, the New York lawyer Trump used for years as his family companys trusted consigliere, told The Daily Beast hes already wasted too much of his time on a case that slowly and then suddenly doesnt seem to be going anywhere. Prosecutors only have until the current grand jurys term expires on April 30 to issue charges, at which point they must ask jurors whove already done this for six months to continue hearing evidenceor call the whole thing off and awkwardly make the entire presentation all over again in front of another 23 jurors.
If this grand jury is let go, Cohen wont play ball. Asked if hed be willing to sit down again with investigators or testify at a future trial against Trump, Cohen responded with utter exasperation.
The fact that they have not done so despite all of this Im not interested in any further investment of my time, he said.
more...
https://www.thedailybeast.com/manhattan-das-star-witness-michael-cohen-indict-trump-now-or-im-out?ref=home
2naSalit
(86,647 posts)It's shit or get off the pot time.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)everyone tiptoeing around this? Infuriating.
jaxexpat
(6,833 posts)Plenty to go around. Wealth is the ONLY law.
Go to jail poor and you're up for a lifetime of disappointment. The prosecution has been delayed to the point of full stop BECAUSE Cohen can and is willing to testify. Same with the 1/6 prosecution, there is a plethora of testimony to support the prosecution. It's open and shut. But the system is under new management every couple of years and people want their jobs to last into retirement.
KPN
(15,646 posts)that view.
Its no wonder I hear young people say the whole system is rigged and needs to be essentially blown up. In their lives, many of them have not seen with any consistency the virtues of our system outweigh its negatives. If the good cant outweigh the bad, why support it? Understandable to me.
jaxexpat
(6,833 posts)That's not a reliable answer any more. Ever since the gop started complaining about voter fraud, it's been not only harder to vote but more likely that your vote won't count.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)And I think we are going to see that in action come this November.
I'm so fucking exasperated with it all. I will vote a straight Democratic ticket this year as usual (not too worried here in MA), but nationally, I think we are going to see a lot of cheating and BS tactics at the ballot box.
BigmanPigman
(51,609 posts)Magoo48
(4,716 posts)MiHale
(9,734 posts)No action is frustrating to us cant imagine how he feels.
Kid Berwyn
(14,909 posts)Im with Cohen on this.
onetexan
(13,043 posts)PatSeg
(47,501 posts)Cohen has paid the price for his loyalty to Trump and now to see an obvious criminal get off yet again, must be infuriating.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)Perhaps some here could explain it to him.
doc03
(35,348 posts)MiHale
(9,734 posts)Ill turn into a doctor. AND DONT WANNA BE ONE!
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)Or that we are simply ignorant because we dont understand that things take time. I replied to a post stating as such earlier this week explaining that Joaquin Castro was pushing for action. I asked if he was ignorant, too.
Castro finished high school a year early, graduated with honors from Stanford, and has a law degree from Harvard.
The response was that he was prosthelytizing.
Okay
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)And this Law and Order episode is in it's 6th year. On this episode alone.
That's a long-ass Law and Order episode.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)in his resignation letter
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Mister Ed
(5,940 posts)Seems to me he'd be the one who knows where all the bodies are buried, so to speak.
doc03
(35,348 posts)former9thward
(32,025 posts)Among other things. He would be worthless as a witness in court. If he is their case Trump would not be worried.
Escurumbele
(3,395 posts)If you have any proof or a concise argument to support your one-liner then please explain, otherwise it is a mute statement.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)a very good evidentiary building block. The cross examination would be 'interesting'.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)In everything from Mafia trials to drug dealer trials. When it comes to conspiracies innocent people are hard to find. And juries routinely believe those who have sinned and convict their fellow wrong-doers, usually higher-ups like dump.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)We don't need to rely solely on Cohen's honesty in this case, there is actual evidence provided which proves he's told the truth in this instance regardless of his previous character and behavior.
When someone says MF45 paid a $130,000 bribe to keep quiet during an election and provides a check signed by MF45 himself, it's pretty clear.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)His only other client was Sean Hannity, for whom he also did real estate work.
He knew what was done, when and how. Because he did it. Provided proof and was convicted for his part. I wouldn't trust him for anything, but that's not relevant. As the prosecutors who resigned in disgust said, there is more than enough physical evidence to prosecute.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)Plenty of those who have been convicted in accounting cases went on to testify against higher ups. Sheesh.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)the point is ... that felons are used all the time to convict other felons. ALL THE TIME. One line, flip responses do not absolve you from recognizing that fact. Address that and quit with the irrelevancies.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)Said your posts are. Read before posting. Read before posting.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)They tried to roll the accountant. He didn't roll. End of case.
Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)That doesn't tell the whole story. It's really not that difficult - if you try.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Screw with the books, there is no case.
But believe what you want.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)First you posted he was a felon and not believable and then he was just a minor player.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)He has no reason to lie anymore.
Piasladic
(1,160 posts)sop
(10,193 posts)as an obviously biased witness with an agenda. Not a good look for the "DA's star witness."
JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)on their two year investigation, Mark Pomerantz said there was more than enough evidence in a paper trail.
stopdiggin
(11,316 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 21, 2022, 04:07 PM - Edit history (1)
who only started to weasel after his own feet were getting toasted rosy red ... Cohen loved the game - until he was the game. And if you get this clown up in front of a jury ... The gag reflex goes into overdrive.
Joinfortmill
(14,432 posts)KPN
(15,646 posts)I think Id take Michael Cohens word over yours on this one. . Theres no big mystery here. Geesh. The DA is either corrupted, blackmailed, or needs to grow some cajones and pursue whats right .
Emile
(22,789 posts)KPN
(15,646 posts)The Wizard
(12,545 posts)Was the new prosecutor bribed or threatened by Don Cheato or one of his stooges? Something really stinks about the prosecutor's decision to drop the case until the clock runs out.
sir pball
(4,743 posts)My understanding of all this is that the crimes they can pin on TFG, e.g. overvaluing buildings for loans and then undervaluing them for taxation, are hardly unique to him - they're endemic amongst Manhattan developers
so Tishman Speyer & co. had a little chat with this new DA.
stopdiggin
(11,316 posts)Even under Vance there was a certain amount of hesitation (within the office) that what they had was 'enough' ... Despite what "Cohen' says - there remains reasonable question. And Cohen is the kind of 'star witness' - that makes you want to crawl back into bed, pull the covers up ...
KPN
(15,646 posts)stopdiggin
(11,316 posts)when I see the Manhattan DA taking multiple real estate developers (and companies) down for fraud and tax evasion! Easy-peasy! Don't know why we hadn't thought of it until now.
yep, that would be ------ -----
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)Like republicons, I'd imagine real estate people despise MF45 as much as the rest of us.
Also like republicons, there doesn't seem to be anything that can be pinned ONLY on the pussygrabber. Everything anyone has on him, whether the corruption is business or political, would also take down too many of them.
It was his insurance policy, and it seems to have worked.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)They're going to have to prove real estate values from years ago, when those values fluctuated widely, often on a daily basis. They'd have comparable properties sold around the same time, but there's a lot more that goes into valuation than just comps. They can just barely prove real estate values today, much less 5 or 10 or 25 years ago. And I doubt his embellishments were so egregious that it would be obvious to somebody if they only bothered to look at the paperwork.
And Trump's fingerprints aren't on anything. No emails, no text messages, no audio recordings, just hearsay evidence if they managed to flip someone. Everything that would have been submitted to Deutsch Bank or the IRS would have been through all the proper accounting teams and real estate attorney processes.
It's not like Trump just called up the President of Deutsch Bank, said a bunch of Trump mumbo jumbo, and then they just took his word for it and gave him a loan.
And their prime witness is a man who was convicted of perjury. It would be one thing if they caught him in a fraud scheme, or if he murdered someone, but Cohen lied under oath to Congress. He's 100% worthless as a witness.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)pays for his crimes in Manhattan. Not ever. Not for 35 years.
KPN
(15,646 posts)what everyone had bugled would take him down. Two impeachments couldnt, but just wait, the State of New York and the Manhattan DA will! Famous last words.
Efilroft Sul
(3,579 posts)BlueJac
(7,838 posts)This is total bullshit, I get it things are happening that we all don't understand! Unreal!
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)If the criminal justice system doesn't prosecute the top level criminals committing top level crimes in broad daylight in full view of every single human being on the planet, then why the fuck is my kid going to jail tomorrow on a trumped up charge?
I am so through with this fucking country.
keopeli
(3,522 posts)your kid, whatever it is. I have no doubt in his/her innocence. Our system is so messed up, the system itself is criminal.
Just want to let you know that I feel deeply for you.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)I would prefer to think more people in the world are like us and not like them.
KPN
(15,646 posts)far too often. Our Justice system definitely favors the wealthy; whether intentionally or unintentionally, doesnt matter. It isnt working as it should and will only be fixed when the influence of money and leverage is removed.
Yes, it really would be something to see. I sometimes think that we will one day see that. At some point, if and when things became obviously bad enough that maybe will happen. I also sometimes think though that incrementalism stands in the way of that by doing just enough to pacify the masses. Thats my three college educated kids theory anyway, and their okay with seeing the whole system just blow up. They dont really believe their votes matter beyond the local level.
spanone
(135,844 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,432 posts)he was part of the entire mess.
JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)they found was guilty of numerous felonies
"A prosecutor who had been leading a criminal investigation into Donald Trump before quitting last month said in his resignation letter that he believes the former president is guilty of numerous felony violations and he disagreed with the Manhattan district attorneys decision not to seek an indictment.
In the letter, published Wednesday by The New York Times, Mark Pomerantz told District Attorney Alvin Bragg there was evidence sufficient to establish Mr. Trumps guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of allegations he falsified financial statements to secure loans and burnish his image as a wealthy businessman."
https://time.com/6160173/donald-trump-committed-numerous-felony-violations-n-y-prosecutor-says-in-resignation-letter/
Frankly, I don't believe Brag
Joinfortmill
(14,432 posts)JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)indict
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)simply and obviously completely worthless.
So, fellow Du'rs, get with the effin program! Justice in the good old U.S.A. is and was only designed to favor anyone with a boatload of cash. period. and will always be.
Justice matters.
(6,933 posts)All he does is just "brag" about how much wealthy he is, but when asked to "prove" it, he changes the subject.
Besides, he also bragged about being the "KING OF DEBT" so if he's "rich" because he owes more than he has, that's not "weathy" in my book.
Plus, he LIES about everything about a thousand times a day...
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)one way for taxes and another for bank loans. The paper trail is extensive and obvious.
JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)Brag came aboard, because from their letter of resignation they felt Brag had no interest in pursuing this, even though the prosecutors said they had more than enough evidence to indict
tavernier
(12,392 posts)His record of truth telling when he worked for DJT is as bad as Trumps. But I was hoping that the documents
had more value than Cohen himself. My guess is that there are so many crooks and so much illegal activity, that its like trying to solve a monkey puzzle to figure out who did what to whom. In the end it was more cost effective to the tax payer to just dump the whole kettle of rotten fish back into the sewer.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)I just think there was no way to jail MF45 without exposing others who do the same thing. Whether it's political or business crime, they'd like to get tRump and ONLY tRUmp, but there doesn't seem to be a way.
It doesn't matter how much Cohen lied previously, it only matters that he tells the truth now and has evidence to prove it.
Rebl2
(13,523 posts)I blame him.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)If the DA wants to bring charges in the future - he already has what you've provided and what you've said. If he needs more for a new grand jury then he can subpoena you.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)All of that evidence against trump and they do nothing? Why would they bother about a subpoena?
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)But it will have little to nothing to do with his preferences on the matter.
Cohen isn't the victim of some crime here. He was involved. He doesn't get to call the shots.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)Those are entirely a thing of history.
Subpoena!?
hahahahahahahahaha
Martin68
(22,822 posts)jalan48
(13,870 posts)Slammer
(714 posts)While I agree that Trump should be charged already, Cohen really doesn't have a way of avoiding testifying if they want him to testify.
They call up another grand jury and subpoena him to testify.
If he refuses, he goes to jail.
If he complies, they ask him the same questions under oath over again. If he doesn't give the same answers, they charge him with perjury and send him to jail.
It really depends on whether the future prosecutors are hardcore enough to lean on Cohen enough to make him testify. Because he's already done enough to thoroughly commit himself to the process, no matter how long it takes.
Hotler
(11,425 posts)Yeah right.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)We just need to be patient.
llashram
(6,265 posts)is a rich white man. He has had years of skirting and breaking laws WITH NO CONSEQUENCE. The serious and probably acrimonious behind the scenes drama that must be going on in this grand jury must be revealed soon or later to say the least. Why do they seem afraid of indicting a known criminal, traitor, or sexual predator? And by extension, it seems the case with Garland's DOJ also. Who in the New York grand jury is holding up the process? Who's bought off? Which we will never know anyway.
BComplex
(8,053 posts)They never intended to indict trump on anything. There are two very distinct justice systems in this country; one for you and me, and one for "them". We aren't "them". We get busted, fined and jailed. They get lots of donations, so they're free to go commit more crimes, and in the case of trump, more atrocities.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)power over so many people in this country (and I am talking about Trump, in case it isn't obvious). I really feel like I've been taking crazy pills for the last five years.
Meowmee
(5,164 posts)To hold him accountable on any level. That is one of the reasons anyway imo. Others are there are way to many who are co crooks on some level and way too many who are easily corrupted and or are intimidated due to some sort of leverage and or self interests.
Mr.Bill
(24,303 posts)that you can't control a Grand Jury with ultimatums. He also needs to understand that refusing to testify before a Grand Jury, whether this one or a future one will not go well for him.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Duppers
(28,125 posts)BradBo
(531 posts)calimary
(81,320 posts)SURELY by now they have enough to go for prosecution! Sure see a line a whole lot of foot-draging and dicking around.
I hope its not that somebodys intimidated by trump. If youve got the goods, what do you care if he gets mad at you in public?