General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Carried interest': Why Romney won't release his tax returns?
'Carried interest': The main reason why Mitt Romney won't release his income tax returns?
On PBS Newshour tonight, Mark Shields just speculated that Mitt Romney's most sensitive secret may be the low low marginal tax rate he's paid on tens of millions of dollars in income. IMO, the most unfair of all the unfair provisions in the tax code is "carried interest", whereby private equity investors get to pay just 15 percent on what many regard as ordinariy income. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carried_interest ). That's a more than 50 percent tax rebate for many of the wealthiest people in the country!
Just imagine the furor that would arise if Democratic proposals to eliminate the HUGE "carried interest" loophole coincided with a Romney admission that he has reaped tens of millions from that bought-and-paid-for tax break!
WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?
bluerum
(6,109 posts)Income is income. Tax it fairly.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)Remember the $700 worth of wine Paul Ryan enjoyed with a hedge-fund economist at a Capitol Hill restaurant last year? (See http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/mystery_solved_ryans_dinner_dates_ided.php to refresh lyour memory).
IMO it's that level of chumminess with "anti-tax" Reoublicans that ensures the very wealthy will NOT pay their fair share as long as the Rs filibusters and House Speakership continue.
Response to ProgressiveEconomist (Original post)
AtomicKitten This message was self-deleted by its author.
gateley
(62,683 posts)ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)to do is ask Romney the following question. THEN IMO you'd REALLY see Mittens squirm!
Mr. Romney, you've made your experience at Bain Capital the centerpiece of your campaing for President. But many private equity and hedge firm managers have enjoyed what many people regard as a very unfair tax break. So-called "carried interest" tax rules allow such people to enjoy a 15 percent marginal tax rate, less than half of what they would pay if their short-term profits were taxed as ordinary income.
Have you PERSONALLY gained from the carried-interest loophole? How much has it saved you in federal income taxes? $100 nukkuib> More?
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)for the character to the right of each letter of the typo, and you'll see I meant "million?"
gateley
(62,683 posts)csziggy
(34,139 posts)I think there's something going around - I've been doing the same thing all week. If it weren't for Firefox spell checkers my messages would be completely encrypted.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)I'm sure I'll be using it in the future.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)and this will have to come out if he's the nominee. Should be interesting seeing it play out.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)True, but couldn't he drag his feet to delay releasing the tax returns? And then only do a partial release?
Do you recall the timetable for tax return disclosures by previous candidates?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)What can they do to him? Repossess his protective Temple underwear?
Retrograde
(10,173 posts)Nothing wrong with charitable contributions - and I have my favorite organizations I support that others may not agree with - but I suspect his returns will show some large contributions to various LDS organizations and a very low - like 0% - tax rate. I also think the returns show that a lot of his income is from foreign sources, which won't play well with the GOP base - plus there's the continuing income Mr. "I'm Unemployed Too" gets from Bain.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)Mitt's marginal tax rate down even further, wouldn't the 'carried interest' loophole do more to undermine a candidacy trumpeting experience at Bain?
I like the way the 'carried interes' tax break ties in with the roles of hedge funds and private capital in bringiing us to the edge of another Great Depression, the OWS focus on the 1 percent, and Eric Cantor's lavish dinner with 'carried interest' lobbyists (see post #4 above).
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)he probably has DEFERRED income ... stock options ... and a wide array of other untaxed perks from his time at Bain.
Think of it like this ... once you make so much money a year that you can't spend it all ... you CONVERT the extra salary into tax differed / exempt forms of income ...
You carry this deferred income, and never touch it ... then, when you die, it passes to your estate, which has been structured so that this money passes to your heirs TAX FREE. You never pay tax on it ... and neither do your heirs.
This is why the GOP fights so hard to protect this money. They already have more than enough money, they don't need an actual salary ... and so they defer it, tax free into their estate, and then pass it on tax free when they die.
rurallib
(62,471 posts)Swiss? Caymans?
Could be real embarrassing.
spanone
(135,917 posts)Saving Hawaii
(441 posts)Then you ride him until he releases. It'll hurt him a lot more that way.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)See post @5 above.
jmowreader
(50,572 posts)Romney makes hundreds of millions per year. Not only does almost all of it get taxed at 15 percent, but after his donations to various tax-free institutions his tax bill is probably lower than mine.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Heh, just kidding.
Morning kick for a great thread.