Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 09:23 PM Apr 2022

Marjorie Taylor Greene's lawyer exposed himself to a 'heckuva conflict of interest': former federal

Full Headline:

Marjorie Taylor Greene's lawyer exposed himself to a 'heckuva conflict of interest': former federal prosecutor

By Matthew Chapman
Published April 22, 2022

?id=26425176&width=2500&height=1392

On Friday, during the hearing against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), her attorney objected to a line of questioning about White House discussions of declaring martial law to overturn the 2020 presidential election — saying that he also represents former President Donald Trump, and claiming that any discussions on that are covered by executive privilege.




In response, former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance expressed her shock at the claim of executive privilege, claiming that it is a "heckuva conflict of interest" for this attorney representing Greene to also have been involved in discussions with Trump — and noting the multiple ways that executive privilege does not, in fact, apply to this situation.

https://www.rawstory.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-lawyer-exposed/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Marjorie Taylor Greene's lawyer exposed himself to a 'heckuva conflict of interest': former federal (Original Post) turbinetree Apr 2022 OP
Judge should tell her to get another lawyer without coi uponit7771 Apr 2022 #1
You would think so......will see what happens.... turbinetree Apr 2022 #2
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2022 #6
Vance was right on that gratuitous Apr 2022 #3
exerting exeutive privlidge on a question to a member of congress is one hell of a hail mary Takket Apr 2022 #4
Both my parents had a phrase for that. calimary Apr 2022 #10
Wait, what? TomSlick Apr 2022 #5
Does anyone know what the judge said in response? n/t thesquanderer Apr 2022 #7
The objection was overruled - Ms. Toad Apr 2022 #13
"I actually represent the president"? sop Apr 2022 #8
:) Right. They did what they could to use the exposure Hortensis Apr 2022 #12
Was she asked about martial law discussions with the White House? unweird Apr 2022 #9
Someone needs to open disbarment proceedings empedocles Apr 2022 #11

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
2. You would think so......will see what happens....
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 09:37 PM
Apr 2022

I still believe these will cases will go to the supreme court...

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. Vance was right on that
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 09:39 PM
Apr 2022

She immediately and correctly pointed out that the former guy and his interests aren't involved in this case, and the ridiculous assertion of executive privilege is just that: ridiculous.

calimary

(81,310 posts)
10. Both my parents had a phrase for that.
Sat Apr 23, 2022, 12:01 AM
Apr 2022

MTG has "more nerve than the guy who ate the first oyster!"

TomSlick

(11,098 posts)
5. Wait, what?
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 09:57 PM
Apr 2022

The lawyer, is putting MTG in jeopardy by claiming executive privilege on behalf of TFG, who he claims to also represent. So yeah, he has a huge conflict of interests.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
13. The objection was overruled -
Sat Apr 23, 2022, 12:38 PM
Apr 2022

meaning he rejected the objection, and MTG had to answer the question.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
12. :) Right. They did what they could to use the exposure
Sat Apr 23, 2022, 12:20 PM
Apr 2022

as a pro-tRump rally, of course. Big election coming up, gotta keep the mob loyal.

unweird

(2,539 posts)
9. Was she asked about martial law discussions with the White House?
Fri Apr 22, 2022, 11:37 PM
Apr 2022

If the President wasn’t mention then why the objection unless such discussions did take place. Was this a tell on both his clients simultaneously?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marjorie Taylor Greene's ...