General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuebec to pass unbelievably onerous language law.
The Quebec National Assembly is entering the final stretch of passing Bill 96, a controversial law set to dramatically expand the provinces ability to mandate the use of French both in public and private life.
Proponents of the bill have called it a critical tool to preserve Quebec as North Americas last majority French-speaking jurisdiction. Nevertheless, Indigenous leaders have denounced the bill as cultural genocide for imposing French on the provinces predominantly English-speaking First Nations communities. Physicians groups have warned it could endanger peoples lives or have negative impacts on mental health if applied. And last week, Quebec college students staged a mass walkout to protest the bills curbs on English-language education. Below, some of the more contested aspects of Bill 96.
With limited exceptions, Bill 96 requires doctors to address their patients in French, even in situations where both doctor and patient would better understand each other in another language. Certain bilingual institutions, such as the Jewish General Hospital, are exempt. As are patients who can prove that theyve attended an English-language school in Canada, or immigrants who have arrived in Quebec within the last six months. But for everyone else, everything from cancer diagnoses to Alzheimers treatment must be performed in French.
If a doctor violates the tenets of Bill 96, all it takes is an anonymous complaint to the Office québécois de la langue française for investigators to enter their office and start seizing records without a warrant, including confidential medical documents. And in this, doctors are not alone: Many of the provisions outlined below are similarly backed by expanded powers of search and seizure by the Office québécois de la langue française.
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/first-reading-quebec-to-pass-unbelievably-onerous-language-law
Mister Ed
(5,934 posts)Even in unexpected places.
MagickMuffin
(15,942 posts)Makes perfect sense.
Will the government provide interpreters?
Will a patient feel comfortable with said interpreters relaying what the doctor is saying?
Won't that infringe on privacy laws? or Does Canada not have privacy laws?
I guess this is no different than certain Americans wanting only English here. Sounds like defeatism in the long run!
eppur_se_muova
(36,263 posts)I know of nothing even roughly comparable to the Académie Française in any other language (that doesn't mean they don't exist).
The majority of Francophones are in former French colonies, and a bit more liberal in such matters. La Francophonie serves a rather different purpose from La Académie, as a common organization for French speakers throughout the world, rather than an enforcer of rules. Most of its officers have been from former colonies.
This legislation appears to be more about cultural dominance, but the language is so central to French culture that any legislation about the culture is, almost inevitably, going to center around the language. I hope the Quebecois representatives can see that this legislation simply goes too far, and is likely to associate the French language with oppressiveness in the minds of many, Canadians and worldwide.
TheBlackAdder
(28,201 posts).
I thought there was a requirement that bi-lingual French & English has to be taught there but, I knew a few people from a company that we purchased software from, and when speaking to them, or calling their homes for off-hours support, their spouses could not even answer the phone in English or understand anything past a basic Hello.
.
Bev54
(10,052 posts)French speaking only. All this will do is wake up the western separatists again. It is the same old fight in a different decade.