Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Initech

(100,205 posts)
Sat May 28, 2022, 10:52 PM May 2022

Conservatives wouldn't know the meaning of the word "freedom" if it jumped up and bit them.




So let me get this straight: you want freedom but at the same time, you go scorched earth on anyone who dares to disrespect the national anthem. Which is literally the exact opposite of freedom. You can't have it both ways, fuck faces.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservatives wouldn't know the meaning of the word "freedom" if it jumped up and bit them. (Original Post) Initech May 2022 OP
I wish it would.... luvallpeeps May 2022 #1
For them, freedom is whatever you're strong enough or well armed enough to get away with...nt Wounded Bear May 2022 #2
+1. yonder May 2022 #4
Freedom to them means being able to beat the crap out of liberals DBoon May 2022 #3
Their sacred song actually includes the line "Land of the free and the home of the brave". Midnight Writer May 2022 #5
Disrespecting the national anthem is dumb and immoral, but it's a protected right gulliver May 2022 #6

DBoon

(22,460 posts)
3. Freedom to them means being able to beat the crap out of liberals
Sun May 29, 2022, 12:15 AM
May 2022

and not having to suffer any consequences

Midnight Writer

(21,954 posts)
5. Their sacred song actually includes the line "Land of the free and the home of the brave".
Sun May 29, 2022, 01:27 PM
May 2022

But when a brave man stands up in a peaceful expression of freedom, harming no one, they melt down.

gulliver

(13,224 posts)
6. Disrespecting the national anthem is dumb and immoral, but it's a protected right
Sun May 29, 2022, 01:34 PM
May 2022

It's dumb, because it sets back any cause it (supposedly) aims to promote. It's immoral, because the many causes it often sets back are good causes. But it is a protected right. An own goal is a legal goal in soccer and hockey.

I don't know what Kapler did or who Nick Adams is. But I do know it's wrong to set back good causes. Sincere and/or good intentions mean nothing to me. Effectiveness for good is what matters. Ineffectivess for good is bad.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Conservatives wouldn't kn...