Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,096 posts)
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 07:48 AM Jun 2022

This statement during last night's hearing is another BFD that needs investigation

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/6/10/2103372/-This-statement-during-last-night-s-hearing-is-another-BFD-that-needs-investigation

This statement during last night's hearing is another BFD that needs investigation
outsidethelines
Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)
Friday June 10, 2022 · 12:26 PM EDT


This should receive far more attention:

8:40 PM: “The White House was receiving specific reports in the days leading up to January 6th, including during President Trump’s rally, indicating that elements in the crowd were preparing for violence at the Capitol.”

Source: Josh Marshall talkingpointsmemo.com/…


The White House was receiving reports for days…

This begs the question: From who?

There have been many excuses made for the inadequate security on January 6th, seemingly countless permutations of the same excuse: “yeah, their was some chatter, but it was dispersed across social media and no really saw this coming”.

Apparently, that was a lie. If the White House was receiving these reports they were getting them from someone. Who? To sentient folks paying the least bit of attention the potential for violence that day was always expected, though the invasion of the Capitol I will grant was not a given in most people’s thoughts, and security planning for the Capitol should have reflected that.

It did not.

So who, exactly, prepared and delivered these reports to the White House?

Was this same information shared with all of these agencies?


Why did ZERO of the agencies responsible for security that day fail to prepare for this potential?

As was testified to last night, there were hours of hand to hand combat at the Capitol being broadcast live to the entire world, and ZERO reinforcements were dispatched from our security forces, our agencies and National Guard responsible for not just planning the security but also to protect our Capitol and its occupants.

Christopher Ray (FBI) is a stone cold liar, as a look back at his testimony proves, as are the leaders of the National Guard and Secret Service that day.

The security failures were no accident. The failure to send reinforcements was no accident. They did not review the intelligence and then ignore it. They stood down. They did what the cops in Uvalde did, only without bothering to even go to the crime scene.

On January 6th every single person understood that ONLY TRUMP could order the insurgents to stop.

For over a year and half the Agencies responsible for this deliberate failure to provide proper security, and their deliberate failure to respond to the violence, boils down to this: Trump was in charge of security on January 6th. Trump got exactly the level of security he wanted in order for the breech of the Capitol to be possible, and for our election to be overturned.
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This statement during last night's hearing is another BFD that needs investigation (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2022 OP
When the issue of calling in the military comes up, the first thing that crosses my mind, is... Frustratedlady Jun 2022 #1
"Army now acknowledges the brother of Michael Flynn was a part of Army response to Capitol riot..." Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #18
Thank you. I had nor seen that article. Frustratedlady Jun 2022 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Frustratedlady Jun 2022 #43
👆👆 crickets Jun 2022 #46
they stood down. mopinko Jun 2022 #2
There Was No Transition modrepub Jun 2022 #5
there was also a huge shake up going on. mopinko Jun 2022 #7
The Proud Boys and OK's NEEDED the mob for cover. They drove them like stampeding cattle. Tommymac Jun 2022 #8
Yup. Needs to be an accounting. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #19
tRump appointed Stoodge of Defence put the National Guard in a noose only he could release. TigressDem Jun 2022 #35
yup. mopinko Jun 2022 #36
"REQUIRED READING"! Thanks. nt Atticus Jun 2022 #3
The Proud Boys and Oath Keepers gab13by13 Jun 2022 #4
And the PB and OK's needed them to provide 'tactical cover' for their attempt to overthrow the gov. Tommymac Jun 2022 #10
yep. Confusion and distraction are all according to the ancient playbook. Then they play innocent librechik Jun 2022 #25
Inside Job: There are no spontaneous coups because they require planning and structure bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #6
Simple malaise Jun 2022 #9
That's the deep state about which the party of projection complained Fullduplexxx Jun 2022 #11
Everything nefarious they do, they project. KPN Jun 2022 #13
Ding ding we have a winner malaise Jun 2022 #17
National Guard DC mgardener Jun 2022 #12
This right here SledDriver Jun 2022 #14
Great statement. Swooped in so close that guilty people all over the country ducked. jaxexpat Jun 2022 #31
+1 2naSalit Jun 2022 #38
Republicans insinuate Nancy Pelosi is to blame for the failure to summon the National Guard Martin Eden Jun 2022 #15
NO! It was never up to her to order a deployment. Another lie by the idiots. oldsoftie Jun 2022 #20
Absolutely not. paleotn Jun 2022 #27
She can request action by the NG and other agencies, but other than that she has no authority...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2022 #32
I believe every subject KS Toronado Jun 2022 #16
Agreed. paleotn Jun 2022 #24
There is more information out there Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #21
Yes it was a general topic of discussion here on DU FakeNoose Jun 2022 #22
I wonder.... paleotn Jun 2022 #23
Every head of a national agency that didn't act should be replaced. lark Jun 2022 #26
I've had this nagging feeling paleotn Jun 2022 #28
Same with me. lark Jun 2022 #29
Small problem-- who's gonna do that? If every one is suspect, TreasonousBastard Jun 2022 #39
Biden or Garland? lark Jun 2022 #40
I personally agree, but the problem is we have to get maybe TreasonousBastard Jun 2022 #42
"Every head of a national agency that didn't act should be replaced" BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #44
That way, "Marshall Law" Kid Berwyn Jun 2022 #30
This is really an important article. llmart Jun 2022 #33
The FBI had no intelligence. THEN it did. TigressDem Jun 2022 #34
it wasnt a coincidence that they picked up tarrio in dec. mopinko Jun 2022 #37
Interesting angle covered in the comments. crickets Jun 2022 #45

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
1. When the issue of calling in the military comes up, the first thing that crosses my mind, is...
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 07:53 AM
Jun 2022

the fact that Michael Flynn's brother was promoted to a position in Hawaii, I believe it was, shortly after all the fuss arose with questions about why the National Guard or military didn't show up. I thought that was curious.

Response to Joinfortmill (Reply #18)

mopinko

(70,247 posts)
2. they stood down.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 07:59 AM
Jun 2022

i wish i had a nickel for every time i typed that since that day.

they stood down. which is why they didnt let the biden transition team into the pentagon.

modrepub

(3,503 posts)
5. There Was No Transition
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:12 AM
Jun 2022

for any government agencies. Remember?!? TFG refused to let anyone talk or meet with anyone representing Biden to do any planning for the next administration. Why? Because TFG and his cronies were concocting hare-brained schemes to stay in power.

I'm almost convinced that if TFG hadn't riled up his losers at the rally to storm the Capital, Republican shenanigans during the official electoral count would have delayed the vote long enough for Faux News and some of the state legislatures to start making noise. IMO, the rioters short circuited the plan. Dummy, f-ed up his own plan by sending a bunch of idiots to disrupt the count.

mopinko

(70,247 posts)
7. there was also a huge shake up going on.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:35 AM
Jun 2022

and the place was already shaken after 4 yrs.

i disagree about the effect of the riot. it was going nowhere w/o the mob. that's the only reason it got as far as it did.

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
8. The Proud Boys and OK's NEEDED the mob for cover. They drove them like stampeding cattle.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:38 AM
Jun 2022

Without the huge mob to distract and occupy the few security forces deployed that day, those PB and OK assault groups would have been overwhelmed and would not have been able to effectively break in, hunt down, and 'neutralize' the proceedings.

The mob provided needed cover.

This is a playbook used for centuries by small dissident groups who want to take over power. Nothing new at all.

TigressDem

(5,125 posts)
35. tRump appointed Stoodge of Defence put the National Guard in a noose only he could release.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 10:49 AM
Jun 2022

SO ahead of Jan 6, Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy sent a request for D.C. National Guard support.

The memo approved the use of only 340 National Guard soldiers and imposed extraordinary limitations.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/02/01/coup-f01.html

gab13by13

(21,412 posts)
4. The Proud Boys and Oath Keepers
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:02 AM
Jun 2022

moved on the Capitol before Trump even spoke. Most of the crowd at the Ellipse was not privy to what was going down, Trump just needed them to storm the Capitol.

Tommymac

(7,263 posts)
10. And the PB and OK's needed them to provide 'tactical cover' for their attempt to overthrow the gov.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:43 AM
Jun 2022

This is from revolutionary playbooks that go back centuries.

Small dissident groups using large mobs to distract the security forces and allow them to perform their evil deeds.

Lenin was particularly good at this - the Russian Revolution was carried out by a relatively small core group of a several hundreds or perhaps thousands; they easily toppled a regime that ruled millions using tactics like this.

The French Revolution is also an example, along with the countless coups that occur in Banana Republics.

Nothing new.

librechik

(30,676 posts)
25. yep. Confusion and distraction are all according to the ancient playbook. Then they play innocent
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 09:50 AM
Jun 2022

and make us prove it (much later) Also according to plan.

bucolic_frolic

(43,321 posts)
6. Inside Job: There are no spontaneous coups because they require planning and structure
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:18 AM
Jun 2022

So not only wasn't this spontaneous and involved a lot of planning on the outside, but it involved disarming on the inside

malaise

(269,191 posts)
9. Simple
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:38 AM
Jun 2022

Lots of folks were part of the coup - Slobby had his own Politburo in place in several agencies.

mgardener

(1,820 posts)
12. National Guard DC
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:48 AM
Jun 2022

This authority to activate the D.C. National Guard has been delegated, by the President, to the Secretary of Defense and further delegated to the Secretary of the Army. The D.C. National Guard is the only National Guard unit, out of all of the 54 states and territories, which reports only to the President.

https://dc.ng.mil/About-Us/

2naSalit

(86,809 posts)
38. +1
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 11:00 AM
Jun 2022

Especially since the entire upper echelon in the Pentagon was replaced in December, including Mike Flynn's brother, a general or something. They were there to make certain there was no response to the attack and if they did anything, they had orders to HELP the attackers.

And don't forget the multiple "war rooms" at that hotel near the WH where all the VPs of the coup were hanging out and directing some of the event.

I have a feeling that we'll be hearing more about those things during at least one of these hearings.

Martin Eden

(12,875 posts)
15. Republicans insinuate Nancy Pelosi is to blame for the failure to summon the National Guard
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:57 AM
Jun 2022

Does the Speaker of the House command the National Guard?

paleotn

(17,989 posts)
27. Absolutely not.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 09:59 AM
Jun 2022

She has zero authority when it comes to the military. That chain of command flows through the executive branch exclusively. She has some pull with Capital Police, but so does the Senate Majority Leader and both Sergeants at Arms on the Capital Police Board. Unofficially, every congress critter thinks they can command the Capital Police. That chain of command is a complete mess and needs to be clarified and fixed.

KS Toronado

(17,350 posts)
16. I believe every subject
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 08:58 AM
Jun 2022

the Select Committee brought into the light of day Thursday night
will be explained in detail in their future hearings.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,660 posts)
21. There is more information out there
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 09:41 AM
Jun 2022

I won’t attempt to quote, because I’ll probably get it wrong, but I know I have seen the following:

A memo regarding the restrictions on deployment of the national guard;

Communications from, I think, the mayor of DC regarding security for the event (IIRC, the mayor requested the NG not be deployed?)

I believe the committee is investigating this issue, and more information has already come to light, and hopefully more will.

FakeNoose

(32,777 posts)
22. Yes it was a general topic of discussion here on DU
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 09:48 AM
Jun 2022

Any regular participants here on this board saw many discussions about what will happen on January 6th, also how will we get Chump to leave the White House. After losing the election it was obvious to many of us that he had no intention of leaving. We commented on the endless, useless lawsuits and demands for recounts by Rudy Giuliani and other lawyers working for Chump.

I don't remember any DUers saying they intended to go Washington DC on January 6th to support Biden. However many, many people said, "Oh no, I'm staying away! There's going to be a lot of trouble."

What we didn't know was that SOME government employees in the Capitol were working in coordination with the people running the coup - but it makes sense doesn't it? Chump always put a premium on "loyalty" to him, and anyone who worked for him was expected to obey orders like zombies to keep him in power.

On that day it took over 5 hours to get the National Guard to the Capitol building. Once they were there, order was restored. All those crazy people were sent home, and a few were arrested. Of course not every government employee agreed with the insurrection, but enough of them did, or at least they did what they were told without asking questions. That's all it took.

paleotn

(17,989 posts)
23. I wonder....
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 09:49 AM
Jun 2022

if like Major Otto Remer in the movie Valkyrie, they knew it was a coup attempt, but didn't yet know which side they were on. I just can't chalk it up completely to confusion and bureaucratic mismanagement, though that did play a part I'm sure. That may lean conspiratorial, but I just ain't buying their excuses for complete failure.

lark

(23,159 posts)
26. Every head of a national agency that didn't act should be replaced.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 09:54 AM
Jun 2022

that includes Miley too, he too took no action when he should have. Of course Wray should be fired and investigated, but also the head of the national guard and secret service. They all stood down on that day and refused to take action and need to be held accountable.

paleotn

(17,989 posts)
28. I've had this nagging feeling
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 10:03 AM
Jun 2022

that like ICE, the Secret Service needs a good scrubbing after 4 years in the Trump sewer. Recent failures of those on FLOTUS's team only confirm that.

lark

(23,159 posts)
29. Same with me.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 10:05 AM
Jun 2022

It's been deeply infected and needs a thorough cleansing of the drumpf rot and hate.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
39. Small problem-- who's gonna do that? If every one is suspect,
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 11:03 AM
Jun 2022

who is above suspicion enough to give the order?

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
42. I personally agree, but the problem is we have to get maybe
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 11:12 AM
Jun 2022

half the rest of the country to agree. Things are so poisoned right now-- who knows how anything good can happen.

BumRushDaShow

(129,563 posts)
44. "Every head of a national agency that didn't act should be replaced"
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 01:24 PM
Jun 2022

Most of the major agencies have had new heads confirmed or nominated under the new administration.

But on that January 6, Northam (who was governor of VA at the time) had their NG deploy -




Garrett Haake
@GarrettHaake
Two sources familiar tell me that @SpeakerPelosi & @MayorBowser have asked for the national guard to come to Capitol Hill to clear rioters. One of those sources says DOD has not yet approved change-of-mission for the DC guard.
2:56 PM · Jan 6, 2021





Governor Ralph Northam
@VAGovernor73
My team and I are working closely with @MayorBowser, @SpeakerPelosi, and @SenSchumer to respond to the situation in Washington, D.C.

Per the Mayor's request, I am sending members of the Virginia National Guard along with 200 Virginia State Troopers.
3:29 PM · Jan 6, 2021


That is when Milley interfered.

There's no "head of the National Guard". They are controlled and deployed by the governors but have federal linkage with their military branches through some leadership structure (e.g., the one that is mentioned the most is the "Army National Guard" ).

The very first hearing that the J6 Committee had, which all of a sudden has been "forgotten" with everyone calling this past week's hearing "the first" is here, and a whole part of it discusses what had happened with that failed/late NG deployment -



Kid Berwyn

(14,971 posts)
30. That way, "Marshall Law"
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 10:11 AM
Jun 2022

Dimdonnie the Demented Moron figured:

Crowd was huuuuge. Cops were feeeew.

To maintain order during the certification of electors, the few cops will have to fire into the crowd, which likely would cause the kind of riot that would lead to martial law. Mike Flynn and his uniformed brothers could use the time to collect ballot boxes and voting machines from PA, WI, NV, GA, AZ, NM, MI and anywhere else the numbers came up wrong. Thankfully, Raffensperger. Otherwise today we’d all be speaking German.

llmart

(15,555 posts)
33. This is really an important article.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 10:42 AM
Jun 2022

I sure hope this comes out in the next hearings and is covered extensively in the mainstream news reports. This would have never risen to the extent it did (murder, war zone, injuries, etc.) if the National Guard would have been called up or even better, on hand before the animals started to assemble.

Remember, "It's going to be wild."

TigressDem

(5,125 posts)
34. The FBI had no intelligence. THEN it did.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 10:43 AM
Jun 2022

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/part-due-free-speech-worries-fbi-never-issued-intel-bulletin-n1253951

The head of the FBI's Washington field office, Steven D'Antuono, had told reporters Friday that the FBI had no intelligence suggesting that violence was brewing before Jan. 6.

He reversed himself in a briefing to reporters Tuesday, acknowledging that the bureau did, in fact, have some intelligence. The FBI identified extremists who intended to travel to Washington and sought to stop them, he said, confirming a story first reported Sunday by NBC News.

crickets

(25,983 posts)
45. Interesting angle covered in the comments.
Sat Jun 11, 2022, 01:37 PM
Jun 2022

This view seems a bit too complimentary to Miller, but it's worth reading for the discussion of restrained USCP/MPD response and for the leadup to legitimate fears re Kash Patel. Yikes.

https://www.dailykos.com/comments/2103372/83777968#comment_83777968

subtropolis - Aureas2
Jun 10, 2022 at 02:39:36 PM

Yes, there was a lot of chum-in-the-water ranting about how “Anteeeefah” was going to be there in force. It was central part of their plan to attract bodies to DC that day. Right up there with, “stand back and stand by” and other rhetoric.

Little noticed, btw, was the huge effort to keep people on the Left away on Jan. 6.

But this was a very complex situation. We should be careful regarding the very limited reaction on Jan. 6. It isn’t all that it seemed. As at least one Capitol Police officer has recently stated, if they’d begun firing into the crowd it would have played directly into TFG’s plans, giving him the justification that he was looking for to declare martial law. It’s not as though many in DC, in federal law enforcement, etc. were not clear-eyed about what That Shitbag was attempting to gin up.

Not shooting more of those assholes is an extreme example, though. It also includes the decision not to deploy the National Guard ahead of the event, and the very late appearance of them after the shit hit the fan. The Shitbag even warned his (acting) SecDef to deploy thousands of them. Why was that rejected? Because Miller was concerned that their presence would become a big part of the Kabuki Theatre that President Shitbag was hoping for.

Not only could NG troops have easily become props for the cameras — a made-for-tv drama to justify martial law — but Miller himself might have been removed in the blink of an eye. Imagine that there’d been 40,000 troops — Shitbag’s suggested number — on the streets that day, and then Miller was suddenly replaced by Kash Patel.


tfg asked SecDef to deploy thousands of National Guard? Uh... can't remember details.

PolitiFact - See subtitle "A mention, no clear request." The number was 10,000.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/01/embedding-with-pentagon-leadership-in-trumps-chaotic-last-week
no paywall https://archive.ph/rTkvG

The president, Miller recalled, asked how many troops the Pentagon planned to turn out the following day. “We’re like, ‘We’re going to provide any National Guard support that the District requests’ [emphasis mine],” Miller responded. “And [Trump] goes, ‘You’re going to need 10,000 people.’ No, I’m not talking bullshit. He said that. And we’re like, ‘Maybe. But you know, someone’s going to have to ask for it.’” At that point Miller remembered the president telling him, “‘You do what you need to do. You do what you need to do.’ He said, ‘You’re going to need 10,000.’ That’s what he said. Swear to God.”


Ultimately it was DC mayor Muriel Bowser, not Miller, who was given blame for the lack of significant National Guard presence. One wonders if she could and should have been overruled. In hindsight the miscalculation seems a cold desertion of the relatively few USCP and MPD who were there that day.


On the day before all hell broke loose on the Hill, [Bowser] made it clear the D.C. police (MPD) would be running the show on the 6th, though 340 unarmed National Guard troops had been requested to help with traffic: “The District of Columbia is not requesting other federal law enforcement personnel and discourages any additional deployment without immediate notification to, and consultation with, MPD.”


Given more information or access to intelligence, would she not have made a different decision? Why wasn't she told?


What did Miller think of the criticism that the Pentagon had dragged its feet in sending in the cavalry? He bristled. “Oh, that is complete horseshit. I gotta tell you, I cannot wait to go to the Hill and have those conversations with senators and representatives.


Oh, sweetie. We look forward to it too. As mentioned in the OP, what was your intelligence at the time and where did it come from? Did you share it with those on Capitol Hill planning the security for that day? Why weren't backup Guard troops standing by ready to go at moment's notice when the call came? Could your January 4 Memorandum to the Secretary of the Army have had something to do with that? What were Charles Flynn's thoughts on the matter?

I cannot wait to hear your explanations.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This statement during las...