Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,035 posts)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:45 PM Jun 2022

High court rejects COVID-19 shot mandate case from New York

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court declined on Thursday to take up a case involving a COVID-19 vaccine requirement for health care workers in New York that does not offer an exemption for religious reasons.

The court's action follows a decision in December in which the justices declined an emergency request to halt the requirement. At the time, doctors, nurses and other medical workers who said they were being forced to choose between their jobs and religious beliefs.

Three conservative justices — Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito — dissented earlier and did so again Thursday.

New York is one of three states, along with Maine and Rhode Island, that do not accommodate health care workers who object to the vaccine on religious grounds.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/high-court-rejects-covid-19-150417852.html

They probably wanted to get home early.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
High court rejects COVID-19 shot mandate case from New York (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2022 OP
I think it would have bene on the docket for next year Dorian Gray Jun 2022 #1
Remember States Rights? OAITW r.2.0 Jun 2022 #2
My Church requires a shot to attend in person. multigraincracker Jun 2022 #3
Nothing. Ms. Toad Jun 2022 #5
That is only for attending in person. multigraincracker Jul 2022 #6
Still doesn't change anything - Ms. Toad Jul 2022 #7
Any grant of cert would have been for the fall term - Ms. Toad Jun 2022 #4

Dorian Gray

(13,496 posts)
1. I think it would have bene on the docket for next year
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:49 PM
Jun 2022

I'm glad they rejected it though. They haven't done much I've appreciated in the last week, so I'll take one win where I can. (Furious about so many of the decisions.)

Ms. Toad

(34,075 posts)
5. Nothing.
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 11:01 PM
Jun 2022

Your church is not a state actor (at least not yet), so it can impose whatever requirements it wants.

Ms. Toad

(34,075 posts)
7. Still doesn't change anything -
Fri Jul 1, 2022, 11:35 AM
Jul 2022

The church can dictate that anyone attending in person turn cartwheels on the lawn before entering, drink codliver oil, donate half of their money to the churcy, or have COVID vaccinations - and the Supreme Court can't do anyhing to help members who don't want to do those things.

Ms. Toad

(34,075 posts)
4. Any grant of cert would have been for the fall term -
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:59 PM
Jun 2022

so they still would have recessed at the same time, even if they had agreed to hear it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»High court rejects COVID-...