General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUS could empower state legislatures' control over elections
This is scarier than Trump World...
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/30/1107648753/supreme-court-north-carolina-redistricting-independent-state-legislature-theory
Based on this independent state legislature theory, they contend that the North Carolina state courts' decision to throw out and replace the legislature-drawn map violates the federal constitution an argument that radically departs from the U.S. Supreme Court's historical record of deferring to state courts on how state constitutions and laws should be interpreted.
A Supreme Court endorsement of the theory could upend elections laws across the U.S.
The high court declined in March to weigh in on an emergency request for this case, but in a dissenting opinion, three of the court's conservatives Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas signaled they would likely side with the Republican lawmakers' embrace of this theory.
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)you can count on that outcome.
Unclee Clarence and Don Alito will make sure of it.
leftieNanner
(15,119 posts)Watching stupid television because of this. I couldn't sleep.
After all the terrible damage these fundamentalist jihadists did to us this week, hearing about this case to be taken up in the next term made me PANIC.
In It to Win It
(8,254 posts)on this ridiculous case, I felt like my heart dropped. It was a real "oh shit" moment. I'm terrified if the Court agrees with this insanity.
leftieNanner
(15,119 posts)Their deliberate racially gerrymandered congressional map.
John Roberts like to pretend to be a reasonable guy. He's not.
In It to Win It
(8,254 posts)That's not reasonable enough for me.
Alito, on the Texas social media case, was basically saying the Court shouldn't have disturbed the 5th circuit's "informed judgement" on putting a stay on enforcement of that law. However, maps that violate federal election law and rules that affects people's basic voting rights somehow is up for grabs and is available to block.
Lovie777
(12,278 posts)can overturn the will of the people? And no state court can do anything about it?
That not democracy.
And again the GQP do not know how to govern fairly. They fuck it up and Democrats have to come un and try to clean and fix it.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)Fairness has nothing at all to do with their achieving their goal of total rule. If they succeed, the country we have known and loved will be gone forever. What we consider "the American way of life" will be reserved for a small number of obedient apparatchiks -- think Steven Miller. The rest of us get a theocratic autocracy that's run by Trump or DeSantis for the benefit Charles Koch and his donor network.
BootinUp
(47,164 posts)ideologues.
In It to Win It
(8,254 posts)BootinUp
(47,164 posts)Is not deciding it last I checked. Not much point in arguing who knows the future. I dont.
In It to Win It
(8,254 posts)in not taking the case in the first place, and not giving this crackpot theory any chance of being the law of the land. Denying their petition leaves us with the status quo as the final decision, and not a potential grenade to the system.
questionseverything
(9,656 posts)So to them it doesnt matter what horrid, horrible thing they do to get there