Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steve Shives: What About the 30 Million Documents Obama Took? (Original Post) Grokenstein Aug 2022 OP
Shit for brain Republican traitors are gonna spread shit... TheRealNorth Aug 2022 #1
WSJ somewhat backed up the Washington Post's article. Jim__ Aug 2022 #2
Thanks for the link from veteran.com - great info to have. nt crickets Aug 2022 #3
oh both sides are bad, so our side is ok RANDYWILDMAN Aug 2022 #4
This has been answered D_Master81 Aug 2022 #5

Jim__

(14,390 posts)
2. WSJ somewhat backed up the Washington Post's article.
Fri Aug 12, 2022, 03:55 PM
Aug 2022

From Washinton Post:

...

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that the list of items seized by FBI agents during the search included 11 sets of classified documents; four were marked top-secret, three were secret and three were identified as confidential — the lowest level of classified information. The Journal reported the inventory of what was taken also referred to a set of documents marked “Various classified/TS/SCI documents,” a government label for a more closely held form of top secret information.

...


And from veteran.com:

...

The U.S. Department of Commerce official site reminds, “Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) is information about certain intelligence sources and methods.” SCI may involve details or other data about “sensitive collection systems, analytical processing, and targeting, or which is derived from it.”

Access to TS/SCI information is permitted on a need-to-know basis for those who have been awarded the appropriate security clearance level. For example, those with a need to know AND a Top Secret clearance may be authorized to view TS/SCI rated material, but someone with only a Secret or Confidential clearance would not.

There are instances of Secret-level classified SCI, those with the appropriate clearance would be authorized to view such material but those without approved clearance levels would be required to obtain them prior to being given access to SCI.

...

TS/SCI Access is always determined by the need to know. Those who hold high clearances (such as Top Secret) are not automatically authorized to handle or view SCI, they must be granted access first.

...

D_Master81

(1,892 posts)
5. This has been answered
Fri Aug 12, 2022, 05:26 PM
Aug 2022

If any Magats cared to do an ounce of research they’d learn that the national archives is in possession of these documents in a secured government facility in Chicago not the Obama storage closet in their home.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steve Shives: What About ...