Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
Thu Sep 1, 2022, 08:58 AM Sep 2022

I don't think Trump and his lawyers understand this yet.

The obstruction charge can be used without the secret documents. In an obstruction case prosecutors would not have to mention secret documents.

Trump was subpoenaed for all documents. He and his lawyers lied. They got a warrant and found documents which proves they obstructed a Federal grand jury subpoena. It is a serious felony. This is an easy case to prove

The charge of stealing secret documents could be prosecuted in a separate trial which would be more difficult because the documents are so secret.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't think Trump and his lawyers understand this yet. (Original Post) fightforfreedom Sep 2022 OP
Actually, the subpoena was limited to documents with classifications onenote Sep 2022 #1
If it ain't yours, keep you damned hands off it underpants Sep 2022 #2
Factually, you are right. Claustrum Sep 2022 #3
As long as the search was valid, they can seize any evidence of any crime unblock Sep 2022 #5
If it's not yours, leave it alone Jilly_in_VA Sep 2022 #4

underpants

(182,884 posts)
2. If it ain't yours, keep you damned hands off it
Thu Sep 1, 2022, 09:02 AM
Sep 2022

You are dead on. This is getting complicated (and even more thoroughly embarrassing for Trump) with the security issues. It’s theft AND obstruction. Pure and simple.

Claustrum

(4,846 posts)
3. Factually, you are right.
Thu Sep 1, 2022, 09:07 AM
Sep 2022

But if the DoJ is going after TFG for the non-classified documents with a search warrant and seizure, it probably wouldn't have gotten pass the court. The probable clause for getting the warrant is indeed linked with national security worries. So at least on the court front, the main battle will be on the classified documents and the mishandling and risking of national security, even though technically he still violated the law with the unclassified documents.

Also, I am sure if some polling is done, the general public will be for an indictment for charging TFG with mishandling of classified documents but not if there are no classified documents. So both on the legal front and public opinion front, the important part of the story is about classified documents.

unblock

(52,329 posts)
5. As long as the search was valid, they can seize any evidence of any crime
Thu Sep 1, 2022, 10:01 AM
Sep 2022

If the had a proper warrant from classified documents but in the process of executing that search, they found a pile of drugs and a dead body with bullet wounds and gun and so on, obviously they could seize that evidence and proceed with drug charges and a murder charge.

If they had a legitimate warrant for classified documents and all they found was declassified government property, they could still seize it and charge him with theft or espionage or whatever.

The warrant limits where you can look. It doesn't limit what you might find or what you might later charge them with.

Jilly_in_VA

(9,999 posts)
4. If it's not yours, leave it alone
Thu Sep 1, 2022, 09:27 AM
Sep 2022

That was one of our family rules growing up. Guess it wasn't in the tRump family.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't think Trump and h...