Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,201 posts)
Fri Sep 16, 2022, 07:12 PM Sep 2022

Litman: The Mar-a-Lago judge's latest opinion is as atrocious as legal experts say it is



Tweet text:

Harry Litman
@harrylitman
·
Follow
“Cannon, in essence, is redefining the classification process to be simply a provisional executive branch judgment subject to overruling by individual judges such as herself. Apart from its legal bankruptcy, such a process would wreak

latimes.com

Column: The Mar-a-Lago judge's latest opinion is as atrocious as legal experts say it is
Federal Judge Aileen Cannon isn't just leaning in to support Donald Trump, she's falling all over him.
4:03 PM · Sep 16, 2022


https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-09-16/mar-a-lago-documents-judge-cannon-ruling

No paywall
https://archive.ph/FEXI0


Thursday’s 10-page opinion by U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon denying the government’s motion for a stay in the Mar-a-Lago documents case is being savaged by commentators in terms normally reserved for grotesque transgressions of justice like the infamous Dred Scott Supreme Court decision.

Respected and generally sober legal analysts have called it an atrocity, “legally and practically incoherent,” “dangerous garbage,” and declared Cannon “a partisan hack.” “No honest and competent legal analyst could have ruled as she did,” tweeted Harvard Law’s Laurence Tribe.

Could the opinion really be that bad?

In a word, yes.

The opinion’s essential flaws go well beyond straining the law and stretching facts in favor of Donald Trump. The ruling rests on the most basic dereliction of judicial responsibility, and it represents a complete departure from the bedrock principle of separation of powers.

Cannon was actually handed a graceful way back from her also broadly pilloried opinion last week, in which she had determined that a special master was required to review the government documents seized at Mar-a-Lago.

*snip*


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Litman: The Mar-a-Lago judge's latest opinion is as atrocious as legal experts say it is (Original Post) Nevilledog Sep 2022 OP
I think it was Neal Katyal BigmanPigman Sep 2022 #1
She sounds like the new mini Barr. Maraya1969 Sep 2022 #2
I don't believe she is the actual author, I think the Federalists wrote these MagickMuffin Sep 2022 #3
Dumb piece of shit judge is protecting her cult leader at all costs dalton99a Sep 2022 #4

MagickMuffin

(15,957 posts)
3. I don't believe she is the actual author, I think the Federalists wrote these
Fri Sep 16, 2022, 07:52 PM
Sep 2022


Aileen Cannon must obey the men in her life. No thoughts and opinions of her own.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Litman: The Mar-a-Lago ju...