Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals Court panel *grants* DOJ request for a stay of parts of Judge Cannon's ruling. (Original Post) Nevilledog Sep 2022 OP
Cool! That was WAY faster than I expected! Brother Buzz Sep 2022 #1
Yes, an IMPORTANT point. People who watch political infotainment Hortensis Sep 2022 #19
Judge Loose Cannon loses LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #2
2 Trump judge, 1 Obama judge Nevilledog Sep 2022 #6
Thank Goodness! SleeplessinSoCal Sep 2022 #3
Good news, but you know Trump will now appeal it to the full Marius25 Sep 2022 #4
and then SCOTUS WarGamer Sep 2022 #7
It's a good ruling. Nevilledog Sep 2022 #8
Thanks elleng Sep 2022 #11
Love that they mention the current administration Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #16
My favorite part comes before that ... Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #18
No en banc review available, only SCOTUS Nevilledog Sep 2022 #15
SCOTUS won't touch it imo. triron Sep 2022 #17
Wow seems like a rough day in trumpville! jcgoldie Sep 2022 #5
Emphasizing 'PARTIAL stay.' elleng Sep 2022 #9
that's what the DOJ asked for. drray23 Sep 2022 #12
So the panel was made up of two Trump nominated judges and one from Pres. Obama. drray23 Sep 2022 #10
Good order. Restores common sense MaryMagdaline Sep 2022 #13
K&R for, woo HOO!!!!! UTUSN Sep 2022 #14

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
19. Yes, an IMPORTANT point. People who watch political infotainment
Thu Sep 22, 2022, 04:55 AM
Sep 2022

daily surely should not be surprised since we now know this was always a possible outcome.

And yet many people have been tearing their virtual hair in fear and frustration. Did they listen wrong, miss or misunderstand this possibility? Were they mislead by misleading media coverage? Both?

All this is going to go on for years, every day a chance to be too smart and cool to be jerked around.

 

Marius25

(3,213 posts)
4. Good news, but you know Trump will now appeal it to the full
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 07:29 PM
Sep 2022

court further delaying things.

Interesting to note, 2 of the 3 judges are Trump appointees (Grant and Brasher). Rosenbaum is an Obama appointee.

Johnny2X2X

(19,060 posts)
16. Love that they mention the current administration
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 09:17 PM
Sep 2022

Biden, not Trump has the power to declassify things.

This is an absolutely devastating ruling for Trump and the SCOTUS will not help him.

Trump is going to be indicted. That is guaranteed now.

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,341 posts)
18. My favorite part comes before that ...
Thu Sep 22, 2022, 04:18 AM
Sep 2022
We begin, as the district court did,with “callous disregard,” which is the “foremost consideration” in determining whether a court should exercise its equitable jurisdiction. United States v. Chapman, 559 F.2d 402, 406 (5th Cir. 1977). Indeed, our precedent emphasizes the “indispensability of an accurate allegation of cal-lous disregard.” Id. (alteration accepted and quotation omitted). Here, the district court concluded that Plaintiff did not show that the United States acted in callous disregard of his constitutional rights. Doc. No. 64 at 9. No party contests the district court’s finding in this regard. The absence of this “indispensab[le]” factor in the Richey analysis is reason enough to conclude that the district court abused its discretion in exercising equitable jurisdiction here. Chapman, 559 F.2d at 406. But for the sake of completeness, we consider the remaining factors.


My interpretation: Judge Loose Qannon had no legally supportable excuse for accepting this in the first place, but we'll go through the rest of it just for the pleasure of chastising and ridiculing her incompetent self, anyway.

Nevilledog

(51,094 posts)
15. No en banc review available, only SCOTUS
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 09:13 PM
Sep 2022


Tweet text:

Steve Vladeck
@steve_vladeck
·
Follow
Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-4 expressly prohibits en banc reconsideration of panel rulings on applications for stays.

In English, if Trump wants to continue to defend Judge Cannon's injunction, his only remaining option is #SCOTUS (where, IMHO, he'll lose):

https://ca11.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/courtdocs/clk/Rules_Bookmark_AUG22.pdf
Image
5:49 PM · Sep 21, 2022

drray23

(7,627 posts)
10. So the panel was made up of two Trump nominated judges and one from Pres. Obama.
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 07:40 PM
Sep 2022

Judge Rosenbaum was appointed in 2014, Braun and Brasher in 2018 and 2020.

It had been pointed out many times that's it's not a given that a judge will vote to favor Trump even if they were nominated by him.
He repeatedly lost during the 2020 election litigation with many of these alleged voting fraud cases in front of judges he had nominated.

Same here. Of course Cannon is an extreme counterexample.

MaryMagdaline

(6,854 posts)
13. Good order. Restores common sense
Wed Sep 21, 2022, 07:42 PM
Sep 2022

How the hell does plaintiff have a PERSONAL INTEREST in anything marked classified?!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Appeals Court panel *gran...