General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsiscooterliberally
(2,860 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)he'll be available in a few days.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,232 posts)This is a better brief compared to the piece of crap filed by TFG's attorneys, but I doubt that this will work. Lindell is part of a plan to steal information from voting machines and theft of confidential information and protected data is not protected by the First Amendment
Link to tweet
Here is a direct link to the filing
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.203171/gov.uscourts.mnd.203171.10.0_1.pdf
yankee87
(2,173 posts)Everyone gets a special master now.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)Geez.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)That his hearing aids are attached to a smart phone and know he doesnt need his phone back. Get a new phone, restore from cloud/backup and your good.
Emile
(22,741 posts)for real entertainment!
Harker
(14,018 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)Im going this route
Harker
(14,018 posts)A special master to leisurely sift through the contents of your glove compartment.
Beetwasher.
(2,977 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,232 posts)Do you any numbers for Friday's mega millions lottery
getagrip_already
(14,750 posts)As so many pointed out, this will now become a standard motion.
But I doubt it will go far. But I'm not a lawyer nor scholar.
I'm not sure what they hope to achieve though. There are no complicated issues here. The filter team can quickly isolate any atty client issues. No other priv would apply unless comms with his wife or doctor are protected and the fbi can determine that.
Pillow talk with his private special master doesn't count here.
SWBTATTReg
(22,124 posts)a defendant would be a tactic employed by every single defendant before long. They shot this down and I suspect that any competent prosecutor would go and use their verbiage to refute future attempts by others to use this tactic.
I suspect that this won't go anywhere, and if anything, will be thrown out of court as soon as Lindell opens his damn mouth.
Volaris
(10,271 posts)and for exactly the reason you stated.
Walleye
(31,022 posts)magicarpet
(14,150 posts)Is it any wonder why the people of Hyannis Port, Martha's Vineyard, and Greater Cape Cod told you to get your sorry ass the fuck outta town.
You are a sickening and repulsive opportunistic evil man. And it remains a mystery to you why everyone shuns and intentionally avoids you like the plague ?
Get a clue - you fucking creepy moron.
Irish_Dem
(47,058 posts)allegorical oracle
(2,357 posts)voting machine companies get finished with him.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts).. just two days ago, shows 4 entries labeled as "DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR". (Docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65363253/lindell-v-united-states-of-america/ )
As to Mr Dershowitz, an entry reads:
Some of them have now filed their request for temporary admission.
Harker
(14,018 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,232 posts)MOMFUDSKI
(5,535 posts)have to keep his underpants on or not?
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,232 posts)The court cited the 11th Circuit opinion in the denial/rejection of the motion for a special master. After the ruling last night by the 11th Circuit, Dershowitz and Lindel were stupid to file this motion/ This makes me smile
Link to tweet
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,232 posts)Here is an article about this silly lawsuit
Link to tweet
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/mike-lindell-sues-u-s-ag-and-fbi-head-over-cell-phone-seizure/
The suit, filed Tuesday names FBI director Christopher Wray as defendant, alongside U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and the United States of America.
The suit alleges that the federal agents "had no authority to detain and question Mr. Lindell against his will," and that Lindell's First Amendment rights were violated because of "his efforts to inform the public about alleged fraud and alleged irregularities he believes occurred in order to bring an end to the dependence on computerized voting and tabulating machines in elections."
It also claims that authorities were tracking Lindell using location services in violation of Lindell's Fourth Amendment rights in the stop and seizure, as well as his Fifth Amendment rights to due process, as well as the Sixth Amendment......
Dominion and Smartmatic, two companies that produce electronic voting machines, are suing Lindell for defamation; his own countersuits against them have been dismissed, as have dozens of other claims of alleged election fraud across the country
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,232 posts)This makes me smile
Link to tweet
https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/federal-judge-citing-11th-circuit-ruling-against-trump-immediately-rejects-alan-dershowitzs-request-for-tro-in-mike-lindell-case/
A federal judge in Minnesota appointed by Donald Trump on Thursday rejected a motion for a temporary restraining order which was filed just yesterday by local counsel and self-described constitutional consultant Alan Dershowitz on behalf of MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell.
U.S. District Judge Eric C. Tostrud noticeably cited a Wednesday ruling by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals that significantly tailored another Trump-appointed district judges special master order in the ongoing Mar-a-Lago clash between the former president and the DOJ.
Like the Trump case, the judge noted, plaintiff Lindell is seeking return of property as DOJ conducts an active criminal investigation (Lindell has not been accused of a crime and is considered a subject):
[W]hen the owner of seized property seeks injunctive relief for the return of property while the case remains in the investigative stage (i.e. before criminal charges are brought), the district court must also balance the governments interest in retaining the property against the owners right to get it back. Id. at 1240; see also Trump v. United States, No. 22-13005, 2022 WL 4366684, at **79 (11th Cir. Sept. 21, 2022) (applying like factors in adjudicating motion for partial stay of district court order).
The judge did not stop here, adding the following blockquote to illustrate his point:
It is a familiar rule that courts of equity do not ordinarily restrain criminal prosecutions. Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 163 (1943); see also Deaver v. Seymour, 822 F.2d 66, 71 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (Silberman, J.) (rejecting civil suit to enjoin government from indicting plaintiff and explaining that [p]rospective defendants cannot, by bringing ancillary equitable proceedings, circumvent federal criminal procedure.); United States v. McIntosh, 833 F.3d 1163, 1172 (9th Cir. 2016) (In almost all federal criminal prosecutions, injunctive relief will not be appropriate. Federal courts traditionally have refused, except in rare instances, to enjoin federal criminal prosecutions.).
Lindell filed suit against Attorney General Merrick Garland and the U.S. as recently as Tuesday, Sept. 20, in a bid to get his cell phone back following a search at a Hardees.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Just sayin.' You really can't make up this shit.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,232 posts)DFW
(54,378 posts)The bumper stickers practically write themselves.