They could not indict him because he was the President.

[kentuck]

Now they cannot indict him because he is a former President.

He should have been indicted when he was President.

But, it would be a precedent if he were to be indicted now.

Now, he is a private citizen. He has no formal title. "Former President" only means that he was once the "President".

There can be no special favors for any private citizen, if he breaks the law.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

1. Some new memo come out that they aren't indicting?

Or just complaining about the DoJ?

[kentuck]

3. Sorry. I was attempting to show how ridiculous some arguments are...

I am with Merrick Garland. I think he is going to indict as soon as all the ducks are in order. But, it will be the right time.

[Chainfire]

7. In all fairness, the evidence today affirms that he has not been indicted.

Do you have a crystal ball?

[underpants]

2. The delay in avoiding the POTUS issue lead to more and worse charges in NY

I know it’s a civil case but I used charges.

They waited and continued to work.

That fluke win was the worst thing that ever happened to him.

[nakocal]

4. Not indicting a sitting president

was a bullshit rule the republican controlled justice department made up to cover up crimes committed by Reagan. And the Bush pardoned all of the convicted felons and people under investigation from the administration.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

5. The sad thing is Reagan probably had no idea it was happening

I remember his defense being “I don’t remember” and it coming out he had Alzheimer’s after he left office.

[markie]

6. ...