Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,896 posts)
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 01:35 PM Sep 2022

Target Venus not Mars for first crewed mission to another planet, experts say

The Guardian

With a surface hot enough to melt lead, crushing atmospheric pressure and clouds of sulphuric acid, Venus might not sound like the most enticing destination for human exploration.

But a group of experts are advocating that our other nearest neighbour, rather than Mars, should be the initial target for a crewed mission to another planet.

There are notable downsides. Walking on the surface would be an unsurvivable experience, so astronauts would have to gaze down at the planet from the safety of their spacecraft in a flyby mission.

In its favour, however, Venus is significantly closer, making a return mission doable in a year, compared with a potentially three-year roundtrip to Mars. A flyby would be scientifically valuable and could provide crucial experience of a lengthy deep-space mission as a precursor to visiting Mars, according to a report presented at the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) in Paris last week.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Target Venus not Mars for first crewed mission to another planet, experts say (Original Post) brooklynite Sep 2022 OP
'Venus is significantly closer, making a return mission doable in a year,' elleng Sep 2022 #1
Per the article, the assumption is that this would be a flyby rather than a landing. brooklynite Sep 2022 #2
Or establishing an orbital post. Or one that floats above the clouds, like a balloon Bucky Sep 2022 #3
Right, very useful: HI, neighbor/BYE, neighbor. elleng Sep 2022 #4
While a flyby would be scientifically valuable... jmowreader Sep 2022 #5
Great idea. Kid Berwyn Sep 2022 #6
we started with a fly by of the moon beflore a landing was tried. dembotoz Sep 2022 #7
I believe none of these will happen. GBTW Tetrachloride Sep 2022 #8
not by americans, anyway rampartc Sep 2022 #12
there's no future for humanity on Venus. Takket Sep 2022 #9
When we arrive on a planet, the first order of business will be to have a referendum to determine if Chainfire Sep 2022 #10
the planet will not belong to the united states. rampartc Sep 2022 #13
I generally don't make it a policy to explain a joke, but I will make an exception: Chainfire Sep 2022 #14
Space travel for humans is stupid. tenderfoot Sep 2022 #11
To explore and conquer is who we are as a species. Chainfire Sep 2022 #15
We have some problems to sort out first zipplewrath Sep 2022 #22
All of that plus we don't know if we can fight of Fascism long enough to accomplish anything. Chainfire Sep 2022 #23
Life on Venus? Jeebo Sep 2022 #16
IIRC it was found Disaffected Sep 2022 #18
Nonsense. Disaffected Sep 2022 #17
From a strictly scientific perspective that is totally correct. Chainfire Sep 2022 #24
I'm your Venus tavernier Sep 2022 #19
Get better "experts". Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #20
Venus could very well make the trip to Mars faster. roamer65 Sep 2022 #21

elleng

(131,290 posts)
1. 'Venus is significantly closer, making a return mission doable in a year,'
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 01:40 PM
Sep 2022

oh sure, return from a hellish environment, EASY!!!

Bucky

(54,087 posts)
3. Or establishing an orbital post. Or one that floats above the clouds, like a balloon
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 01:46 PM
Sep 2022

Plus waste disposal would be less of a problem if you're floating over venus.

jmowreader

(50,573 posts)
5. While a flyby would be scientifically valuable...
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 01:49 PM
Sep 2022

…any science obtainable from such a mission could be done with sensors on an uncrewed vehicle.

If they just wanted to gain experience in sustaining people in space for three years, there is a lot of the Moon that hasn’t had anyone on it yet.

dembotoz

(16,864 posts)
7. we started with a fly by of the moon beflore a landing was tried.
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 01:52 PM
Sep 2022

could be a good step towards mars.

I think we have sent way more probes to mars so there is probably all sorts of stuff to learn about venus

rampartc

(5,453 posts)
12. not by americans, anyway
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:21 PM
Sep 2022

i became an engineer thinking that space was the inevitable frontier.

i should have studied mandarin, because the chinese are going, we are not. .

Takket

(21,669 posts)
9. there's no future for humanity on Venus.
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 01:55 PM
Sep 2022

and flying by it can't tell us anything we don't already know or can't learn from Mars. If there is any future on Mars that is where the missions need to focus. Venus can, has been, and should be studied with robotic missions.

Chainfire

(17,715 posts)
10. When we arrive on a planet, the first order of business will be to have a referendum to determine if
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:00 PM
Sep 2022

the Planet wants to become part of the United States.

rampartc

(5,453 posts)
13. the planet will not belong to the united states.
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:26 PM
Sep 2022

musk is south african, but whichever bulluionaire claims mars, they will not abide any american laws or standards or limits on their power over their colonists.

if an actual nation state arrives there first, i am not betting on the usa being close.

Chainfire

(17,715 posts)
14. I generally don't make it a policy to explain a joke, but I will make an exception:
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:29 PM
Sep 2022

This was a reference to recent news from Ukraine.

Chainfire

(17,715 posts)
15. To explore and conquer is who we are as a species.
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:31 PM
Sep 2022

If we can go long enough without destroying ourselves space travel and occupation of other bodies is inevitable.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
22. We have some problems to sort out first
Mon Sep 26, 2022, 07:30 PM
Sep 2022

Basically water and oxygen. There are no gas stations in the solar system. No place to stop and fill up on oxygen or water, or hydrogen. There will be losses in a ship and they will need to be addressed. The ISS gets a regular resupply from earth, roughly every 3 months. They can last roughly about 6 without resupply depending upon crew size.

The astronauts also can't be expected to live in zero g for 9 months and then go running around a planet with gravity collecting rocks and digging in the dirt. Their ship will have to have some form of generated gravity.

We are decades away from landing on any distant planets. We will have to build insanely expensive "space stations" to learn how to operate in space for extremely long periods without resupply from earth first. New technologies are probably going to be needed as well. And the number of people required for these missions are going to be larger than what goes up to the ISS.

The cost will be so excessive, I suspect they will have to engage a large international coalition of the 12 or so richest countries to cooperate to build it. How long do you think before that happens?

Chainfire

(17,715 posts)
23. All of that plus we don't know if we can fight of Fascism long enough to accomplish anything.
Mon Sep 26, 2022, 09:05 PM
Sep 2022

We may be on a repeat trip to the middle ages.

Jeebo

(2,028 posts)
16. Life on Venus?
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:40 PM
Sep 2022

I think I remember reading somewhere that they think there might be some kind of life forms floating around in the upper atmosphere of Venus, above the hellish conditions on the surface.

-- Ron

Disaffected

(4,572 posts)
17. Nonsense.
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:45 PM
Sep 2022

What possible benefit would there be to putting humans in orbit around Venus (and especially when any applicable science could be just as easily and much more cheaply carried out by unmanned spacecraft)? Maybe they want a human presence to greet any Venusians who might happen drop by??

Human space travel anywhere (Mars included) beyond earth orbit is similarly unnecessary - much more could be accomplished by spending half the amount of money on unmanned craft.

Chainfire

(17,715 posts)
24. From a strictly scientific perspective that is totally correct.
Mon Sep 26, 2022, 09:09 PM
Sep 2022

When have humans ever done something from a strictly scientific perspective? The space program won't be able to keep funding itself it if can't produce something more exciting than sending another drone to space. We have to get into that cheering phase if we want to continue to move forward. Promise to send a right-winger to the sun, and the money will keep on coming. He can go at night when it isn't so hot.

tavernier

(12,410 posts)
19. I'm your Venus
Sun Sep 25, 2022, 02:58 PM
Sep 2022

I’m your fire
At your desire.


Yup… Smokin’ !!
Make mine Mars or Pluto. Or maybe one of those moons a
circling Jupiter. That would be a pretty awesome sight from the living room window!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Target Venus not Mars for...