Did Matthew Hale tell Samuel Alito about this "line" in a spectral evidence dream or something?
Last edited Mon Oct 3, 2022, 09:49 AM - Edit history (1)
Justice Samuel Alito, the author of the Dobbs ruling, has heard the concerns and he clearly has a problem with them. The Wall Street Journal reported:
In a comment Tuesday to The Wall Street Journal, Justice Alito said: It goes without saying that everyone is free to express disagreement with our decisions and to criticize our reasoning as they see fit. But saying or implying that the court is becoming an illegitimate institution or questioning our integrity crosses an important line.
The article did not quote the far-right jurist further I suspect he didnt elaborate though the ambiguity leaves some unanswered questions. If Kagan and others have crossed an important line, what exactly does Alito see as the appropriate consequence? Is he of the opinion that people are free to disagree with the high court, but not question its legitimacy?
Whats more, Alito hasnt exactly presented a defense of the institution. Indeed, in his comments to The Wall Street Journal, he didnt even make an argument, per se. The justices pitch, in effect, is that people shouldnt question the integrity of the court or its members because, well, just because.
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/supreme-courts-standing-falters-alito-pushes-flawed-defense-rcna49939