General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse elections: So fed up with the media calling the House for the rethugs
There are 17 undecided races in California and XX races elsewhere [note:I need to research specifically what those are].
If Dems pic up these undecided races, they could have House control as well.
Just wish the talking heads would just say that House races and eventual control is still pending and stop asserting that the rethugs have the house and reporting on what McCarthy is doing to plan for it. ENOUGH.
https://www.cnn.com/election/2022/results/california
Walleye
(31,032 posts)They cant help it, its some kind of compulsion
iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)But it is going to be EXTREMELY difficult for the Democrats to hold on.
That is just reality. It's not some big conspiracy.
The votes are being counted. Democrats are behind. 90% of the outstanding races would have to go their way, and that's just highly unlikely.
But nobody has called anything yet.
Kaleva
(36,316 posts)iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)Kaleva
(36,316 posts)If I knew the names, I'd probably be able to find the segment on YouTube.
iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)iemanja
(53,038 posts)Decision desks, separate from the on-air personalities, do.
BumRushDaShow
(129,206 posts)insisting the GOP had 221 seats, with a weak disclaimer paraphrased as "but it's still up for grabs" -
Link to tweet
@nytimes
·
Follow
Republicans have won or are leading in 221 U.S. House races as of Thursday afternoon, enough for a slim majority. But control remains up for grabs.
Lt. Gov. John Fetterman greeted union steelworkers at a canvassing event in Coatesville, Pa., the morning before Election Day.
nytimes.com
Midterms Live Updates: Congress Remains in Play as Georgia Senate Race Heads for Runoff
Closely fought races in Georgia, Arizona and Nevada have yet to be called. President Biden said he plans to run for re-election in 2024 but will make a final decision next year.
1:14 PM · Nov 10, 2022
(as of ~3:30 pm EST)
It's like a "push narrative".
Kaleva
(36,316 posts)I read it as saying if they win the districts they are leading in, that and the districts they have won would give them a slim majority. However, that remains to be seen.
BumRushDaShow
(129,206 posts)Republicans won or are leading in 221 races, enough for a slim majority, but control remains up for grabs. See where things stand.
Nothing about "if".
This then becomes an implied - "They have more than enough (221) to take the House" narrative, "so don't bother... " and this is asserted with thousands of votes still out - particularly from blue parts of counties. Meanwhile they are writing about Kevin McCarthy measuring the proverbial drapes.
Anything that has enough remaining blue area ballots should be left as a grey TOSSUP and not assigned "red" based on the "snapshot of the moment". A number of these races may end up in automatic recount territory anyway so calling them now is a fool's errand in order to push for concessions and to satisfy a corporate owner who wants to "wrap it up", and move on rather than let it play out.
I won't go as far as the "Dewey Wins" faux pas but I know right here in Philly, we had similar nonsense published by the election hacks at the Philly Inquirer that I post about over and over, regarding their sloppy reporting about the Philadelphia turnout in 2020 before all the votes came in.... And to this day, they have STILL refused to tender a correction to their bullshit article.
Iris
(15,662 posts)Also, this is not a race to see who gets their votes counted fastest. That's why the Q freaks seem to think the last election was "stolen"
BumRushDaShow
(129,206 posts)Analysis: As America awaits crucial midterm results, here's why we know the winners of most races but can't yet say who will control Congress
Ultimate click-bait. My "analysis" -
- Um no they don't "await". They are glad to be rid of the damn ads and robocalls and robotexts.
- Really?
Oh you mean the ones that were called and the other party conceded?
Johnny2X2X
(19,082 posts)Both are very likely, but why is one being portrayed as a horse race and the other as a foregone conclusion?
Right now the betting markets have Dems as a 91% favorite to keep the Senate, and Reps as an 82% favorite to take the House.
The media is biased against Dems right now because they became invested in a red wave.
Even MSNBC is pushing this angle, they'll get good news for Dems in Zona and Nevada and immediately spin it negatively.
https://www.predictit.org/markets/17/US-Elections
iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)for weeks they have been projecting that the dems would be shellacked. And now that it didn't happent, they are pushing another narrative.
iemanja
(53,038 posts)and have all said it, including Fox.
Wounded Bear
(58,675 posts)65% or so in and a small lead for the Dem. It was one of those districts where a trumper won the primary over the repub incumbant and it isn't going well so far.
I'm hopeful.
iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,675 posts)Leading 52-48 right now. We'll see.
https://ballotpedia.org/Washington%27s_3rd_Congressional_District_election,_2022
iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,675 posts)fingers crossed.
In It to Win It
(8,262 posts)likely that the GOP will take the House, even though by an extremely slim margin.
iemanja
(53,038 posts)I doubt you'll find one. Possibly Fox, but even then they have a decision desk separate from their anchors. Scenarios suggest a Republican victory is likely, but that is not the same as calling it.
If they call it, then it's a reality.
Demsrule86
(68,618 posts)we lost the house...the only exception is Nicole Wallace thus far.