Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(145,567 posts)
Thu Nov 17, 2022, 11:38 PM Nov 2022

DOJ reply brief in Special Master destroys TFG's claims/right for special master

The DOJ filed a reply brief to TFG's weak brief on whether Judge Lose Cannon had the authority to appoint a special master. Oral arguments were scheduled on this case before the DOJ filed its reply brief. Such oral arguments will be on Tuesday of Thanksgiving week.

Here is a link to the reply brief filed by the DOJ.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23311103-221117-doj-reply-brief
The two reasons advanced by TFG for the need for a special master have either been dropped or found to be without merit. TFG in his response brief essential dropped the claims based on executive privilege and so far the special master has found one document that may be subject to attorney client privilege.

Here is a fun analysis of this filing by the DOJ
















The DOJ brief is strong and the prior TFG brief was a piece of crap. The oral arguments will be to watch


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Takket

(21,629 posts)
3. The lawyers involved should also be referred to the bar for misconduct
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 01:03 AM
Nov 2022

The privilege bullshit had a sliver of a slice of a Hail Mary but the “thinking it makes it personal argument” is abuse of the court and should be punished.

Takket

(21,629 posts)
8. Maybe he should have stuck with Jenna Ellis lol
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 09:44 AM
Nov 2022

Since a parking ticket lawyer could come up with the same thing!!!

chriscan64

(1,789 posts)
6. I cannot imagine a Trump team response to this that holds water.
Fri Nov 18, 2022, 06:59 AM
Nov 2022

"Your Honors, we refer you to the case of Finders v. Keepers which was cited in the case of Bully v. Nerd allowing plaintiff to keep the lunch money."

LetMyPeopleVote

(145,567 posts)
9. DOJ officially tells appeals court that Jack Smith approves all of the arguments presented
Tue Nov 22, 2022, 03:16 AM
Nov 2022

Last edited Tue Nov 22, 2022, 05:49 PM - Edit history (1)

The oral arguments for the DOJ appeal of Judge Loose Cannon's special master ruling were amusing. TFG's attorneys filed TFG's response on Monday of last week and the DOJ reply brief was due on Thursday. On Wednesday of last week, the 11th Circuit scheduled oral arguments for today, Nov. 22.

Jack Smith has read all of the pleadings and has approved the oral arguments.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DOJ reply brief in Specia...